Research Article

The impact of nutritional status on the outcomes of cancer patients such as mortality, survey and length of hospitalization in palliative care

Volume: 5 Number: 2 March 4, 2019
EN

The impact of nutritional status on the outcomes of cancer patients such as mortality, survey and length of hospitalization in palliative care

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the effects of nutritional status of the cancer patients in the palliative unit on some important outcomes such as mortality, hospitalization periods and survey.

Methods: The study was carried out through a retrospective review of 65 cancer patients who were treated at the palliative care center. The age and gender of the patients, the type of cancer, the place where they are referred to the palliative unit (from home or from the hospital), from which unit they came from (oncology, intensive care unit, other services), the length of stay, how long they lived after discharge, how long each patient lived after the palliative unit hospitalization day and the NRS-2002 scores were recorded.

Results: There was a statistically significant difference between the median hospital duration of the home-based patients and the median duration of hospital-based patients (11 [2-42] days versus 22 [2-180] days) (p = 0.001). The mean survival time of the home-based patients was median 87.5 (2-323) days, while this was 9 (2-104) days in hospital-based patients (p = 0.017). While 29.5% (n = 13/27) of the patients coming from the house died in the palliative care center, it was 70.5% in the patients taken from the hospital (p = 0.002). The NRS-2002 scores of the cancer patients who were followed up at the palliative unit were correlated with the age of the patients (r = 0.365, p = 0.003).

Conclusions: We concluded that the patients who came to palliative care from home have better surveys than the ones came from the hospital. 

Keywords

References

  1. [1] Sobotka L, editor. Basics in clinical nutrition. 4th ed. Galen; 2012.
  2. [2] Sieber CC. Nutritional screening tools--How doesthe MNA compare? Proceedings of the session held in Chicago May 2-3, 2006 (15 Years of Mini Nutritional Assessment). J Nutr Health Aging 2006;10:488-94.
  3. [3] Bauer JM, Vogl T, Wicklein S, Trögner J, Mühlberg W, Sieber CC. Comparison of the Mini Nutritional Assessment, Subjective Global Assessment, and Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS 2002) for nutritional screening and assessment in geriatric hospital patients. Z Gerontol Geriatr 2005;38:322-7.
  4. [4] Whitby LG. Screening for disease: definitions and criteria. Lancet 1974;2:819-22.
  5. [5] Hakkarainen TW, Arbabi S, Willis MM, Davidson GH, Flum DR. Outcomes of patients discharged to skilled nursing facilities after acute care hospitalizations. Ann Surg 2016;263:280-5.
  6. [6] Massucci M, Perdon L, Agosti M, Celani MG, Righetti E, Recupero E, et al. Prognostic factors of activity limitation and discharge destination after stroke rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2006;85:963-70.
  7. [7] Chang FH, Ni P, Jette AM. Does activity limitation predict discharge destination for post-acute care patients? Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2014;93:782-90.
  8. [8] Guigoz Y. The Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) review of the literature - What does it tell us? J Nutr Health Aging 2006;10:466-85.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Health Care Administration

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

March 4, 2019

Submission Date

May 1, 2018

Acceptance Date

December 13, 2018

Published in Issue

Year 1970 Volume: 5 Number: 2

AMA
1.Avcı D, Çetinkaya A. The impact of nutritional status on the outcomes of cancer patients such as mortality, survey and length of hospitalization in palliative care. Eur Res J. 2019;5(2):375-381. doi:10.18621/eurj.420153