Research Article

The prognostic role of Charlson comorbidity index for critically ill elderly patients

Volume: 6 Number: 1 January 4, 2020
EN

The prognostic role of Charlson comorbidity index for critically ill elderly patients

Abstract

Objectives: Comorbidities represent a risk factor for adverse events in several critical illnesses. The aim of this study was to identify the relationship between the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) with mortality and length of stay (LOS) in critically ill elderly patients.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was made of patients admitted to our tertiary adult intensive care unit (ICU) between January 2015 and January 2016. The impact of comorbidity was evaluated with the CCI. Other required data were retrieved from the patients' follow-up records.

Results: The study included a total of 251 patients. The mean age was 78.79 ± 6.70 years. The total mortality rate was 41.0%. The most common cause for admission was sepsis and acute respiratory failure (18.3% vs 18.3%). The median APACHE II score was significantly higher in non-survivors than survivors (31.0 [13.0-47.0] vs 21.0 [9.0-40.0]; p < 0.01). The median CCI was 2.0 (0.0-7.0) for survivors and 3.0 (1.0-10.0) for non-survivors. The CCI of non-survivors was significantly higher than that of survivors (p = 0.005). Patients with CCI > 3 had higher mortality than those with CCI 3 (p < 0.05). The odds ratio of the APACHE II score for mortality was 1.214 (95% CI: 1.154-1.276), and for CCI it was 1.320 (95% CI: 1.088-1.602). There was a significant positive correlation between CCI and LOS (r=0.147; p = 0.020).

Conclusions: CCI is strongly associated with both mortality and LOS. It can be used as a prognostic marker for elderly patients in critical care. 

Keywords

References

  1. 1. Zimmerman JE, Alzola C, Von Rueden KT. The use of benchmarking to identify top performing critical care units: a preliminary assessment of their policies and practices. J Crit Care 2003;18:76-86.
  2. 2. Orsini J, Butala A, Salomon S, Studer S, Gadhia S, Shamian B, et al. Prognostic factors associated with adverse outcome among critically ill elderly patients admitted to the intensive care unit. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2015;15:889-94.
  3. 3. Talib S, Sharif F, Manzoor S, Yaqub S, Kashif W. Charlson comorbidity index for prediction of outcome of acute kidney injury in critically ill patients. Iran J Kidney Dis 2017;11:115-23.
  4. 4. Burch JB, Augustine AD, Frieden LA, Hadley E, Howcroft TK, Johnson R, et al. Advances in geroscience: impact on healthspan and chronic disease. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2014;69 Suppl 1:S1-3.
  5. 5. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987;40:373-83.
  6. 6. Quan H, Li B, Couris CM, Fushimi K, Graham P, Hider P, et al. Updating and validating the Charlson comorbidity index and score for risk adjustment in hospital discharge abstracts using data from 6 countries. Am J Epidemiol 2011;173:676-82.
  7. 7. Núñez JE, Núñez E, Fácila L, Bertomeu V, Llàcer A, Bodí V, et al. [Prognostic value of Charlson comorbidity index at 30 days and 1 year after acu]te myocardial infarction]. Rev Esp Cardiol 2004;57:842-9. [Article in Spanish]
  8. 8. Tripathy S, Mishra JC, Dash SC. Critically ill elderly patients in a developing world--mortality and functional outcome at 1 year: a prospective single-center study. J Crit Care 2014;29:474.e7-13.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Haematology , ​Internal Diseases

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

January 4, 2020

Submission Date

August 6, 2018

Acceptance Date

April 30, 2019

Published in Issue

Year 2020 Volume: 6 Number: 1

AMA
1.Yıldız A, Yiğt A, Benli AR. The prognostic role of Charlson comorbidity index for critically ill elderly patients. Eur Res J. 2020;6(1):67-72. doi:10.18621/eurj.451391

Cited By