Fixed- versus adjustable-loop femoral fixation in anterior cruciate ligament surgery: Is one method clinically superior?

Year 2025, Volume: 11 Issue: 5, 957 - 965, 04.09.2025

Mücahid Osman Yücel , Raşit Emin Dalaslan , Sönmez Sağlam , Zekeriya Okan Karaduman , Mehmet Arıcan

https://doi.org/10.18621/eurj.1707845

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to compare fixed-loop and adjustable-loop femoral fixation systems in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction to determine whether one provides superior short-term clinical outcomes.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 88 patients who underwent anatomic ACL reconstruction by the same surgical team at Düzce University Faculty of Medicine between January 01, 2018 and December 31, 2023. Patients were divided into two groups as those with a fixed-loop (n=39) and those with an adjustable-loop (n=49). A standard postoperative rehabilitation program was applied to all patients. Lysholm knee score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and range of motion (ROM) were evaluated preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively as clinical evaluation parameters.

Results: Both groups demonstrated significant improvement in VAS, Lysholm, and IKDC scores during the postoperative period (P<0.001). Postoperative Lysholm score was 77.5±14.8 and IKDC score was 64.4±10.7 in the fixed-loop group, while these values were 78.4±4.1 and 66.7±10.3 in the adjustable-loop group, respectively. There was no significant difference in postoperative scores between the groups (P>0.05).

Conclusions: Fixed- and adjustable-loop femoral fixation systems used in ACL reconstruction show similar performance in terms of short-term clinical outcomes. Both methods can be safely preferred; the final choice of method should be based on the surgeon's experience and patient-specific factors. Further studies evaluating long-term outcomes are needed.

Keywords

Anterior cruciate ligament , reconstruction , orthopedic fixation devices , treatment outcome , arthroscopy , range of motion

Ethical Statement

This study was approved by the Düzce Uıniversity Clinical Research Ethics Committee (Decision No: 2024/128; date: 21.04.2025). All procedures were conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments. Informed consent was waived because of the retrospective nature of the study and the analysis used anonymous clinical data.

References

• 1. Motififard M, Akbari Aghdam H, Ravanbod H, et al. Demographic and Injury Characteristics as Potential Risk Factors for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries: A Multicentric Cross-Sectional Study. J Clin Med. 2024;13(17):5063. doi: 10.3390/jcm13175063.
• 2. Yao S, Fu BS, Yung PS. Graft healing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol. 2021;25:8-15. doi: 10.1016/j.asmart.2021.03.003.
• 3. Rodríguez-Merchán EC. Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Is Biological Augmentation Beneficial? Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(22):12566. doi: 10.3390/ijms222212566.
• 4. Onggo JR, Nambiar M, Pai V. Fixed- Versus Adjustable-Loop Devices for Femoral Fixation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy. 2019;35(8):2484-2498. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.02.029.
• 5. Ranjan R, Gaba S, Goel L, et al. In vivo comparison of a fixed loop (EndoButton CL) with an adjustable loop (TightRope RT) device for femoral fixation of the graft in ACL reconstruction: A prospective randomized study and a literature review. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2018;26(3):2309499018799787. doi: 10.1177/2309499018799787.
• 6. Özdemir G, Turan S, Aslan H, Bingöl O, Deveci A, Kılıç E. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with ToggleLoc with ZipLoop system versus transfix system: A cost-effectiveness analysis. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2021;27(2):231-237. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2020.22487.
• 7. Eichinger M, Ploner M, Degenhart G, et al. Tunnel widening after ACL reconstruction with different fixation techniques: aperture fixation with biodegradable interference screws versus all-inside technique with suspensory cortical buttons. 5-year data from a prospective randomized trial. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023;143(11):6707-6718. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-05001-x.
• 8. Lin Y, Zhang L, Shen S, et al. No Difference in Bone Tunnel Enlargement and Clinical Outcome between Cortical Suspension and Hybrid Femoral Fixation in Hamstring Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Orthop Surg. 2024;16(4):902-911. doi: 10.1111/os.14024.
• 9. Lee TJ, Jang KM, Kim TJ, Lee SM, Bae JH. Adjustable-Loop Cortical Suspensory Fixation Results in Greater Tibial Tunnel Widening Compared to Interference Screw Fixation in Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Medicina (Kaunas). 2022;58(9):1193. doi: 10.3390/medicina58091193.
• 10. Singh S, Shaunak S, Shaw SCK, Anderson JL, Mandalia V. Adjustable Loop Femoral Cortical Suspension Devices for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review. Indian J Orthop. 2020;54(4):426-443. doi: 10.1007/s43465-019-00022-4.
• 11. Houck DA, Kraeutler MJ, McCarty EC, Bravman JT. Fixed- Versus Adjustable-Loop Femoral Cortical Suspension Devices for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Biomechanical Studies. Orthop J Sports Med. 2018;6(10):2325967118801762. doi: 10.1177/2325967118801762.
• 12. Asif N, Khan MJ, Haris KP, Waliullah S, Sharma A, Firoz D. A prospective randomized study of arthroscopic ACL reconstruction with adjustable- versus fixed-loop device for femoral side fixation. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2021;33(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s43019-021-00124-0.
• 13. McDermott E, DeFoor MT, Blaber OK, Aman ZS, DePhillipo NN, Dekker TJ. Biomechanical comparison of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction fixation methods and implications on clinical outcomes. Ann Jt. 2023;8:15. doi: 10.21037/aoj-22-52.
• 14. Robinson JR, Haddad FS. ACL graft failure: surgical technique may affect outcomes. Bone Joint J. 2021;103-B(9):1439-1441. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B9.BJJ-2021-0919.
• 15. Choi NH, Yang BS, Victoroff BN. Clinical and Radiological Outcomes After Hamstring Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions: Comparison Between Fixed-Loop and Adjustable-Loop Cortical Suspension Devices. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45(4):826-831. doi: 10.1177/0363546516674183.
• 16. Chandru V, MS S, JS ST, Nair RR. Comparison of Fixed- and Variable-Loop Button Fixation in Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Cureus. 2022;14(4):e24218. doi: 10.7759/cureus.24218.
• 17. Sheth H, Salunke AA, Barve R, Nirkhe R. Arthroscopic ACL reconstruction using fixed suspensory device versus adjustable suspensory device for femoral side graft fixation: What are the outcomes? J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2019;10(1):138-142. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2017.09.004.
• 18. Hyodo K, Kanamori A, Watanabe R, et al. Does loop length change after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with adjustable loop cortical suspension device?: Observation of the hamstring graft completely filling the femoral tunnel. J Exp Orthop. 2023;10(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s40634-023-00629-5.
• 19. Bachmaier S, Monaco E, Smith PA, Frank RM, Matzkin EG, Wijdicks CA. Biomechanical Comparison of 3 Adjustable-Loop Suspensory Devices for All-Inside ACL Reconstruction: A Time-Zero Full-Construct Model. Orthop J Sports Med. 2023;11(9):23259671231201461. doi: 10.1177/23259671231201461.
• 20. Smith PA, Piepenbrink M, Smith SK, Bachmaier S, Bedi A, Wijdicks CA. Adjustable- Versus Fixed-Loop Devices for Femoral Fixation in ACL Reconstruction: An In Vitro Full-Construct Biomechanical Study of Surgical Technique-Based Tibial Fixation and Graft Preparation. Orthop J Sports Med. 2018;6(4):2325967118768743. doi: 10.1177/2325967118768743.
• 21. Kocazeybek E, Meric E, Ersin M, et al. Clinical outcomes of three different techniques using adjustable-loop fixation in arthroscopic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A prospective randomized clinical trial. Knee. 2023;43:208-216. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2023.06.015.
• 22. Kyriakidis T, Tzaveas A, Melas I, Petras K, Iosifidou AM, Iosifidis M. Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Utilizing Double Adjustable-Loop Suspensory Fixation Devices Provides Good Clinical Outcomes in Patients under the Age of 40 Years at Two-Year Follow-Up. J Clin Med. 2024;13(18):5436. doi: 10.3390/jcm13185436.
• 23. Mohamed RSAA, El-Din El-Shafie MH, El-Sheikh MA. Clinical Outcome of Fixed Versus Adjustable Loop Cortical Suspension Devices in Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2020;22(3):181-185. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0014.3234.
• 24. Ahn JH, Ko TS, Lee YS, Jeong HJ, Park JK. Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Clinical Results of Outside-in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Comparison of Fixed- and Adjustable-Length Loop Cortical Fixation. Clin Orthop Surg. 2018;10(2):157-166. doi: 10.4055/cios.2018.10.2.157.
• 25. Kaya S, Guven N, Unal YC, et al. Comparison of long-term clinical and radiologic outcomes of AperFix and fixed loop device fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A retrospective study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2025;104(3):e41199. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041199.