Gümrük Prosedürlerinin Küresel Rekabet Gücü Üzerindeki Etkisi: Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi ile Bir İnceleme

Öz

Gümrük prosedürleri, ticareti kolaylaştırmak, ulusal güvenliği sağlamak ve ürün ve hizmetlerin ulusal sınırlar arasında serbest dolaşımını sağlamak için yürütülen faaliyetleri kapsamaktadır. Bu süreçlerin etkin bir şekilde yürütülmesi ulusların ticari dışa açıklığını geliştirmekte, ekonomik büyümeyi desteklemekte ve ülkelere rekabet gücü sağlamaktadır. Bu çalışma, OECD (Ekonomik İşbirliği ve Kalkınma Örgütü) ve seçilmiş Asya ülkelerinde gümrük prosedürlerinin küresel rekabet gücü üzerindeki etkisini uluslararası ticaret ve ekonomik büyümenin aracılık rolleri üzerinden incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bu bağlamda, 42 ülkenin 2010, 2012, 2014, 2016, 2018 ve 2023 yıllarına ait verileri kullanılarak bir model önerisi sunulmuştur. Araştırma kapsamında önerilen modelde yer alan değişkenler arasındaki doğrudan ve dolaylı ilişkiler Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi (YEM) yol analizi ile incelenmiştir. Analiz sonuçları, gümrük prosedürlerinin küresel rekabet gücü üzerinde doğrudan ve pozitif bir etkiye sahip olduğunu göstermektedir. Ayrıca, uluslararası ticaret ve ekonomik büyümenin bu ilişkiye anlamlı ve pozitif bir şekilde aracılık ettiği gözlemlenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Gümrük Prosedürleri
• Uluslararası Ticaret
• Küresel Rekabet Gücü
• Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi

The Impact of Customs Procedures on Global Competitiveness: An Investigation with Structural Equation Modelling

Öz

Customs procedures cover activities carried out to facilitate trade, ensure national security, and ensure the free movement of goods and services across national borders. The efficient execution of these processes improves the trade openness of nations, supports economic growth and provides competitiveness to countries. This study aims to examine the impact of customs procedures on global competitiveness in OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) and selected Asian countries through the mediating roles of international trade and economic growth. In this context, a model proposal is presented using data from 42 countries for the years 2010, 2012, 2014, 2016, 2018 and 2023. The direct and indirect relationships between the variables in the model proposed within the scope of the research were examined by Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) path analysis. The results of the analysis show that customs procedures have a direct and positive effect on global competitiveness. In addition, it has been observed that international trade and economic growth mediate this relationship significantly and positively.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Customs Procedures
• International Trade
• Global Competitiveness
• Structural Equation Modelling

Kaynakça

1. Appeals, T. & Swielande, H. S. D. (1998). Rolling Back the Frontiers: The Customs Clearance Revolution. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 9(1), 111-118.
2. Arvis, J. F., Ojala, L., Shepherd, B., Ulybina, D. & Wiederer, C. (2023). Connecting to Compete 2023: Trade Logistics in an Uncertain Global Economy-The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators.
3. Bayraktutan, Y. & Özbilgin, M. (2015). Lojistik Maliyetler ve Lojistik Performans Ölçütleri. Maliye Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(2), 95-112.
4. Benazić, A. (2012). Measuring Efficiency in the Croatian Customs Service: A Data Envelopment Analysis Approach. Financial Theory and Practice, 36(2), 139-179.
5. Beysenbaev, R. & Dus, Y. (2020). Proposals for Improving the Logistics Performance Index. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 36(1), 34-42.
6. Bugarčić, F. Ž., Skvarciany, V., & Stanišić, N. (2020). Logistics Performance Index in International Trade: Case Of Central and Eastern European and Western Balkans Countries. Business: Theory and Practice, 21(2), 452-459.
7. Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural Equation Modelling with Amos. Routledge, New York.
8. Collier, J. E. (2020). Applied Structural Equation Modeling Using AMOS: Basic to Advanced Techniques. Routledge, New York.

9. Dasanayaka, C. H., Perera, Y. S., & Abeykoon, C. (2022). Investigating the Effects of Renewable Energy Utilization Towards the Economic Growth of Sri Lanka: A Structural Equation Modelling Approach. Cleaner Engineering and Technology, 6, 100377.
10. De Wulf, L. & Sokol, J. B. (Eds.) (2005). Customs Modernization Handbook. World Bank Publications.
11. Dong, H. J., Gerdle, B., Bernfort, L., Levin, L. Å. & Dragioti, E. (2020). Pain Catastrophizing in Older Adults With Chronic Pain: The Mediator Effect of Mood Using A Path Analysis Approach. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 9(7), 2073, 1-15.
12. Drobot, E. V., Klevleeva, A. R., Afonin, P. N. & Gamidullaev, S. N. (2017). Risk Management in Customs Control. Ekonomika Regiona=Economy of Regions, (2), 550-558.
13. Elmane-Helmane, K. & Ketners, K. (2012). Integrated Customs Control Management in Latvia: Lessons Learned. Economics and Management, 17(2), 528-533.
14. Filová, A. & Hrdá, V. (2021). Managerial Evaluation of the Logistics Performance and its Dependencies on Economies in Selected Countries. Ekonomicko-Manazerske Spektrum, 15(1), 15-27.
15. Gani, A. (2016). The Efficiency of Customs Clearance Processes Can Matter for Trade. International Advances in Economic Research, 22(1), 109-110.
16. Garcia Pires, A. J. (2012). International Trade and Competitiveness. Economic Theory, 50(3): 727-763.
17. Gordhan, P. (2007). Customs in the 21st Century. World Customs Journal, 1(1), 49-54.
18. Gürbüz, S. (2019). AMOS ile Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi. Seçkin Yayıncılık, Ankara.
19. Hausman, W. H., Lee, H. L. & Subramanian, U. (2013). The Impact of Logistics Performance on Trade. Production and Operations Management, 22(2): 236-252.
20. Hayes, A. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical Mediation Analysis in The New Millennium. Communication Monographs, 76(4), 408-420.
21. Hoekman, B. & Nicita, A. (2011). Trade Policy, Trade Costs, and Developing Country Trade. World Development, 39(12), 2069-2079.
22. Jain, S. R. (2012). Coordinated Border Management: The Experience of Asia and the Pacific Region. World Customs Journal, 6(1), 63-67.
23. Karpenko, L., Pashko, P., Chunytska, I., Akhlamov, A. & Kostenko, A. (2020). The Role of Customs Regulation in Ensuring the Economic Security of The Country. Journal of Security & Sustainability Issues, 10(1).
24. Keskin, M. H. (2018). Lojistik, Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimi (7. Basım). Nobel Yayın Dağıtım, Ankara.
25. Kilibarda, M., Andrejic, M. & Popovic, V. (2017). Efficiency of Logistics Processes in Customs Procedures. 3rd Logistics International Conference Serbia (Vol. 14, No. 17, 45-51).
26. Kline, R. B. (2019). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. The Guilford Press, New York.
27. Lai, K. H., Wong, C. W. & Cheng, T. E. (2008). A Coordination-Theoretic Investigation of The Impact of Electronic Integration on Logistics Performance. Information & Management, 45(1),10-20.
28. Martí, L., Puertas, R. & García, L. (2014). The Importance of the Logistics Performance Index in International Trade. Applied Economics, 46(24): 2982-2992.
29. Moldabekova, A., Philipp, R., Satybaldin, A. A. & Prause, G. (2021). Technological Readiness and Innovation as Drivers for Logistics 4.0. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(1), 145-156.
30. OECD. (2023). About OECD. https://www.oecd.org/about/ (10 December 2023).
31. Oğuz, S. (2024). The Link Between Trade Openness, Economic Growth, Energy Use and Carbon Emissions: Analysis with a Conceptual Model Proposal. Sosyoekonomi, 32(60), 181-195.
32. Onogwu, D. J. (2018). Corruption and the Efficiency Of Customs’ Clearance Process In Selected Countries. Review of Public Administration & Management, 6(3), 1-8.
33. Pilinkiene, V. (2016). Trade Openness, Economic Growth and Competitiveness. The Case of the Central and Eastern European Countries. Inžinerinė Ekonomika, 27(2), 185-194.
34. Rbehat, A. M. & Marafi, H. B. (2024). The Role of Customs Process in Facilitating International Trade. Saudi Journal of Business and Management Studies, 9(1), 7-14.
35. Sawhney, R. & Sumukadas, N. (2005). Coping with Customs Clearance Uncertainties in Global Sourcing. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 35(4), 278-295.
36. Schumacker, R. E. & Lomax, R. G. (2004). A Beginner's Guide to Structural Equation Modeling. Psychology Press, Taylor and Francis Group.
37. Setiawan, M. R. S., Mendrofa, E. L. A. M. & Pramana, G. M. A. P. (2020). Border Management: Challenges and Issues at The Border in Indonesia. Customs Research and Applications Journal, 2(2), 84-104.
38. Shi, D., Lee, T., & Maydeu-Olivares, A. (2019). Understanding the Model Size Effect on SEM Fit İndices. Educational and psychological measurement, 79(2), 310-334.
39. Shiberu, B. & Tamene, B. (2021). Effect of Import Customs Procedure on Trade Facilitation the Case of Adama City. Information Technology in Industry, 9(3), 1-16.
40. Shikur, Z. H. (2022). The Role of Logistics Performance in International Trade: A Developing Country Perspective. World Review of Intermodal Transportation Research, 11(1): 53-69.
41. Tiwari, S., Raza, S. A., Gupta, S. K., Shahzadi, I., & Kuruva, M. B. (2024). Testing the LCC Hypothesis by Considering Environmental Sustainability and Economic Development: Role of Green Energy and Resource Management. Geoscience Frontiers, 15(3), 101666.
42. Wang, H. D., Zheng, C. F., & Xiao, X. (2022). An AMOS Model for Examining the Factors Influencing the Development of China Cross‐Border E‐Commerce Comprehensive Pilot Areas. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2022(1), 1889589.
43. Wang, Y., Zhou, L., Jia, Q. & Ping, X. (2019). Direct and Indirect Effects of Environmental Factors on Daily CO2 Exchange in a Rainfed Maize Cropland-A SEM Analysis with 10 Year Observations. Field Crops Research, 242, 107591.
44. World Bank. (2023). World Bank Open Data. https://data.worldbank.org/ (15 December 2023)
45. World Economic Forum. (2023). Publications. https://www.weforum.org/publications/ (17 December 2023)
46. Yang, N., Zhang, Z., Xue, B., Ma, J., Chen, X., & Lu, C. (2018). Economic growth and pollution emission in China: Structural path analysis. Sustainability, 10(7), 2569.
47. Yeo, J. (2022). Beyond Immigration and Customs Enforcement: Understanding Interorganizational Collaboration for Border Management. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 37(5), 975-997.
48. Zhang, A. (2002). Electronic Technology and Simplification of Customs Regulations and Procedures in Air Cargo Trade. Journal of Air Transportation, 7(2), 87-102.