Araştırma Makalesi

Mapping the Landscape of Disaster Research: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis

Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2 25 Mayıs 2025
PDF İndir
TR EN

Mapping the Landscape of Disaster Research: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis

Abstract

In the event of a disaster, the resulting material and moral damages are inevitable. Therefore, it is crucial to implement effective disaster management strategies to mitigate the impact of such occurrences. In order to achieve this, it is essential to conduct comprehensive examinations of both qualitative and quantitative studies on various disasters. This process allows for the identification of methodological changes, the assessment of needs, and the formulation of suggestions in the field of social sciences related to disasters during the disaster period (short term; long term). In this context, it is crucial to understand the studies conducted before and after disasters, as well as the effects of disasters on successful disaster management. This study aims to conduct a meta-analysis of disaster studies in the literature and to reach a general conclusion by evaluating the results of the studies obtained in the literature. In this context, the study aims to reach general conclusions about the effects of disasters by qualitatively and quantitatively examining the studies related to the subject in the journals scanned by WOS through keywords such as disaster, COVID-19, flood, and natural disasters.

Keywords

Kaynakça

  1. Altay, N. & Green, W. G. (2006). OR/MS research in disaster operations management. European Journal of Operational Research, 175(1), 475–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EJOR.2005.05.016
  2. Arcos González, P. & Cernuda Martínez, J. A. (2023). An approach to the background, methods and challenges of research in disasters. Qeios. https://doi.org/10.32388/qck7en.2
  3. Auf Der Heide, E. (2006). The importance of evidence-based disaster planning. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 47(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.05.009
  4. Charil, A., Laplante, D. P., Vaillancourt, C. & King, S. (2010). Prenatal stress and brain development. Brain Research Reviews, 65(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresrev.2010.06.002
  5. De Juan, A. & Koos, C. (2021). Survey participation effects in conflict research. Journal of Peace Research, 58(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343320971034
  6. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N. & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2021.04.070
  7. Durieux, V. & Gevenois, P. A. (2010). Bibliometric ındicators: Quality measurements of scientific publication. Radiology, 255(2).
  8. Fothergill, A., DeRouen Darlington, J. A. & Maestas, E. G. M. (1999). Race, ethnicity and disasters in the United States: A review of the literature. Disasters, 23(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7717.00111

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Kamu Yönetimi

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

25 Mayıs 2025

Gönderilme Tarihi

10 Temmuz 2024

Kabul Tarihi

11 Mart 2025

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2025 Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA
Balcı, T., & Türkyılmaz, A. S. (2025). Mapping the Landscape of Disaster Research: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis. Fiscaoeconomia, 9(2), 1252-1266. https://doi.org/10.25295/fsecon.1513745
download?token=eyJ1aWQiOjEwMTE3NywiYXV0aF9yb2xlcyI6WyJST0xFX1VTRVIiXSwiZW5kcG9pbnQiOiJqb3VybmFsIiwib3JpZ2luYWxuYW1lIjoiMjAyNi0wMy0xNF8wMC0xOC01OC5wbmciLCJwYXRoIjoiNTVjMC82NjE0LzA5NGEvNjliNDdmNjNjMjdiMDUuMDA4NTE4OTUucG5nIiwiZXhwIjoxNzczNDQwMzcxLCJub25jZSI6IjMzYzNhMDczOTJhZDBiOWUxMjA4MTJlMzAwOTdlMDhjIn0.uxgvoBOu5rdPPckMLotZ4eBnzOQVB_StL3DcxMXqMSU


Fiscaoeconomia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY).