Musluk Suyunun Soyut Niteliklerinin Tüketici Tutumuna Etkisi

Öz

Nüfus artışının yanında sorumlu olmayan tüketim ve üretimin artması toprak, su ve havanın kirlenmesine neden olmaktadır. Karbon salınımının artması küresel ısınmayı, bu da şiddetli yağış, kuraklık, kıtlık gibi konuları gündeme taşımakta, sürdürülebilirliği öncelik haline getirmektedir. Burada su kıtlığı dünyanın dengesi için dikkatlice izlenen bir konudur. Suyun etkin ve verimli kullanılmaması ulusların geleceği için ciddi tehditler arasındadır. Bu çalışmada tüketicilerin musluk suyu tüketim davranışı incelenmektedir. Görebildiğimiz kadarı ile Türkiye’de musluk suyu ve şişeli su tüketim davranışını karşılaştıran bir çalışma yoktur. Bu boşluğu doldurmaya katkı sunmak için sağlıklı, ekonomik, kolay erişilebilir olması nedeni ile şişeli suya tercih edilmesi gereken musluk suyuna yönelik tüketici algıları bu çalışmada araştırılmıştır. Araştırma Rize’nin Fındıklı ilçesinde yapılmıştır. Araştırmanın verileri kolayda örnekleme yöntemi ile belirlenen tüketicilerle yapılan anketlerle toplanmıştır. SPSS istatistik programı ve PLS tabanlı Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi ile veriler analiz edilmiştir. Elde edilen bulgulara göre, musluk suyuna yönelik algılanan kalite; musluk suyu tüketimini etkilerken, şişe suyu kullanımını etkilememektedir. Musluk suyuna yönelik algılanan risk, şişeli su kullanımını etkilemektedir. Algılanan risk algılanan kalitenin öncülüdür. Musluk suyuna yönelik kalitenin arttırılması ve riskin azaltılması musluk suyu kullanımı arttırabilecek, şişeli su kullanımını azaltabilecektir. Kamu otoritesinin gerekli yatırımları yaparak tüketici algılarını olumlu yönde değiştirmesi ile musluk suyu kullanımı arttırılabilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Musluk Suyu
• Tüketici Kalite Algısı
• Tüketici Tutumu

The Impact of Intangible Attributes of Tap Water on Consumer Attitude

Öz

In addition to population growth, the increase in irresponsible consumption and production causes soil, water, and air pollution. The increase in carbon emissions results in global warming, which brings heavy rain, drought, and famine to the agenda and makes sustainability a priority. Here, water scarcity is a subject that is carefully monitored for the future of the world. Ineffective and inefficient use of water is among the serious threats for the future of nations. This study examines the Consumers' tap water consumption behavior. As far as we are concerned, there is no study comparing tap water and bottled water consumption behavior in Turkey. In order to contribute to filling this gap, consumer perceptions towards tap water, which should be preferred to bottled water due to its being healthy, economical, and easily accessible, were investigated in this study. The research was conducted in the Fındıklı district of Rize. The data of the research were collected through surveys carried out with consumers determined by the convenience sampling method. The data were analyzed with the SPSS statistical program and PLS-based structural equation modeling. According to the findings, the perceived quality of tap water affects tap water consumption but does not affect the use of bottled water. Perceived risk of tap water affects the use of bottled water. Perceived risk is a precursor to perceived quality. Increasing the quality of tap water and reducing the risk can increase tap water use and decrease bottled water use. Tap water useage can be increased by making the necessary investments by the public authority and changing consumer perceptions positively.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Tap Water
• Consumer Quality Perception
• Consumer Attitude

Kaynakça

1. Al-Omran, A.M., El-Maghraby, S.E., Aly, A.A., Al-Wabel, M.I., Al-Asmari, Z.A., & Nadeem, M.E. (2013) Quality assessment of various bottled waters marketed in Saudi Arabia. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 185, 6397-6406.
2. Amelia, T.S.M., Khalik, W.M.A.W.M., Ong, M.C., Shao, Y.T., Pan, H.J., & Bhubalan, K. (2021). Marine microplastics as vectors of major ocean pollutants and its hazards to the marine ecosystem and humans. Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, 8(12), 1-26.
3. Anadu, E.C., & Harding, A.K. (2000). Risk perception and bottled water use. American Water Works Association Journal, 92(11), 82-92.
4. Bach, C., Dauchy, X., Chagnon, M., Etienne, S., Bach, C., Dauchy, X., Chagnon, M., & Etienne, S. (2012). Chemical migration in drinking water stored in polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottles: a source of controversy. Water Research, 46(3), 571-583.
5. Borriello, A., Massey, G., & Rose, J.M. (2022). Extending the theory of planned behaviour to investigate the issue of microplastics in the marine environment. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 179, 113689.
6. Chae, Y., & An, Y.-J. (2018). Current research trends on plastic pollution and ecological impacts on the soil ecosystem: A review. Environmental Pollution, 240, 387-395.
7. Chatterjee, C., Triplett, R., Johnson, C.K., & Ahmed, P. (2017). Willingness to pay for safe drinking water: A contingent valuation study in Jacksonville, FL. Journal of Environmental Management, 203(1), 413-421.
8. Chowdhury, S., Mazumder, M.A.J., Al-Attas, O., & Husain, T. (2016) Heavy metals in drinking water: ocurrences, implications, and future needs in developing countries. Science of the Total Environment, 569-570, 476-488.

9. CSB (2024). T.C. Çevre ve Şehircilik Bakanlığı “Su” adlı broşür. Ankara.
10. Cohen, J., 1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
11. Çiner, F. (2017). Su kullanımında tüketici davranışları ve farkındalık - Niğde örneğinde bir alan araştırması. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 23(9), 1019-1026.
12. De-la-Torre, G.E. (2020). Microplastics: An emerging threat to food security and human health. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 57(5), 1601-1608.
13. Deng, L., Xu, B., Yang, X., & Hu, A. (2021). Water quality and health risk assessment based on hydrochemical characteristics of tap and large-size bottled water from the main cities and towns in Guanzhong Basin, China. Environmental Earth Science, 80, 139.
14. Dindarloo, K., Ghaffari, H.R., Kheradpisheh, Z., Alipour, V., Ghanbarnejad, A., Fakhri, Y., & Goodarzi, B. (2016) Drinking water quality: comparative study of tap water, drinking bottled water and point of use (PoU) treated water in Bandar-e-Abbas, Iran. Desalination and Water Treatment, 57(10), 4487-4493.
15. Doria, M.F. (2006). Bottled water versus tap water: understanding consumers’ preferences. Water and Health, 4(2), 271-276.
16. Doria, M.F. (2010). Factors influencing public perception of drinking water quality. Water Policy, 12(1), 1-19.
17. Doria, M.F., Pidgeon, N., & Hunter, P.R. (2005). Perception of tap water risks and quality: a structural equation model approach. Water Science & Technology, 52(8), 143-149.
18. Durduran, Y., Uyar, M., Boyraz, Y.K., Demir, L.S., Tekin, Ö., & Şahin, T.K. (2017). Konya ili Meram ilçesine bağlı aile sağlığı merkezlerine başvuran kadınlarda içme suyu kullanım tercihleri. Türk Hijyen ve Deneysel Biyoloji Dergisi, 74(EK-1), 125-130.
19. FB (2025, Mart 4). Fındıklı Belediyesi, https://findikli.bel.tr/vergi-harc-ve-tarifeler-2/
20. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating structural models with unobservables variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
21. Geerts, R., Vandermoere, F., Winckel, T.V., Halet, D., Joos, P., Steen, K.V.D., Meenen, E.V., Blust, R., Borregán-Ochando, E., & Valeminki, S.E. (2020). Bottle or tap? Toward an integrated approach to water type consumption. Water Research, 173, 115578.
22. Gleick, P.H., & Cooley, H.S. (2009). Energy implications of bottled water. Environmental Research Letters, 4(1), 014009.
23. Guissouma, W., Hakami, O., Al-Rajab, A.J., & Tarhouni, J. (2017) Risk assessment of fluoride exposure in drinking water of Tunisia. Chemosphere, 177, 102-108.
24. Hair, J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C.M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). SAGE Publications.
25. Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modelling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43, 115-135.
26. Horowitz, N., Frago, J., & Mu, D. (2018). Life cycle assessment of bottled water: a case study of Green2O products. Waste Management, 76, 734-743.
27. Hu, Z., Morton, L.W., & Mahler, R.L. (2011). Bottled water: United States consumers and their perceptions of water quality. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 8(2), 565-578
28. Karakuş, E., Lorcu, F., & Demiralay, T. (2016). Ambalajlı su sektöründe tüketici tercihleri ülkelerin yakınlıklarının değerlendirilmesi. Uluslararası İktisadi Ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, (17), 103-128.
29. Ko, S.H., & Sakai, H. (2022). Perceptions of water quality, and current and future water consumption of residents in the central business district of Yangon city Myanmar. Water Supply, 22(1), 1094-1106.
30. Lavers, J.L., & Bond, A.L. (2017). Exceptional and rapid accumulation of anthropogenic debris on one of the world’s most remote and pristine islands. PNAS, 114(23), 6052-6055.
31. Leveque, J.G., & Burns, R.C. (2017). A Structural Equation Modeling approach to water quality perceptions. Journal of Environmental Management, 197, 440-447.
32. Miner, C.A., Dakhin, A.P., Zoakah, A.I., Afolaranmi, T.O., & Envuladu, E.A. (2015). Household drinking water; knowledge and practice of purification in a community of Lamingo, Plateau state, Nigeria. EJERM, 6(3), 230-236.
33. Muhib, I., Uddin, K., Rahman, M., & Malafaia, G. (2023). Occurrence of microplastics in tap and bottled water: Current knowledge. Science of The Total Environment, 865, 161274.
34. Oyebog, S.A., Ako, A.A., Nkeng, G.E., & Suh, E.C. (2012). Hydrogeochemical characteristics of some Cameroon bottled waters, investigated by multivariate statistical analyses. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 112, 118-130.
35. Pant, N.D., Poudyal, N., & Bhattacharya, S.K. (2016). Bacteriological quality of bottled drinking water versus municipal tap water in Dharan municipality. Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition, 35, 17.
36. Pehlivan, E., Burak, M., Bektaş, D., Bayat, S., & Kart A. (2017). Malatya ilinde yaşayan genç yetişkinlerin su tüketim davranışlarının değerlendirilmesi. Türk Hijyen ve Deneysel Biyoloji Dergisi, 74(EK-1), 135-142.
37. Potera, C. (2002). The price of bottled water. Environmental Health Perspectives, 110, A76.
38. Proulx, F., Rodriguez, M.J., Sérodes, J.B., & Bouchard, C. (2012). Spatio-temporal variability of tastes and odors of drinking water within a distribution system. Journal of Environmental Management, 105, 12-20.
39. Proulx, F., Rodriguez, M.J., Serodes, J.B., & Miranda, L.F. (2010). Factors influencing public perception and use of municipal drinking water. Water Science & Technology: Water Supply-WSTWS, 10(3), 472-485.
40. Prouty, C., & Zhang, Q. (2016). How do people’s perceptions of water quality influence the life cycle environmental impacts of drinking water in Uganda?. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 109, 24-33.
41. Raj, S.D. (2005). Bottled water: how safe is it?. Water Environment Research, 77, 3013-3018.
42. Uzundumlu, A.S., Fakıoğlu, Ö., Köktürk, M., & Temel, T. (2016). Erzurum ilinde en uygun içme suyu tercihinin belirlenmesi. Alinteri Journal of Agriculture Science, 30(1), 1-7.
43. Yalılı Kılıç, M. (2017). Bursa’da su kullanımının tüketici açısından değerlendirilmesi, Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 17(035401), 965-973.
44. Zaki, G., & Shoeib, T. (2018). Concentrations of several phthalates contaminants in Egyptian bottled water: effects of storage conditions and estimate of human exposure. Science of The Total Environment, 618, 142-150.
45. Zivin, J.G., Neidell, M., & Schlenker, W. (2011). Water quality violations and avoidance behavior: Evidence from bottled water consumption. American Economic Review, 101(3), 448-453.