Research Article

Relationship Between Leg Circumference and Limb Occlusion Pressure in Dominant and Non-Dominant Legs Using an Automated BFR Device in Healthy Male Individuals

Volume: 30 Number: 3 September 26, 2025

Relationship Between Leg Circumference and Limb Occlusion Pressure in Dominant and Non-Dominant Legs Using an Automated BFR Device in Healthy Male Individuals

Abstract

The aim of this research was twofold: i) to investigate the relationship between leg circumference and limb occlusion pressure (LOP) by using an automated blood flow restriction (BFR) device, ii) to compare the LOP and leg circumferences between the dominant (D) and non-dominant (ND) legs. One hundred and four participants (age=20.79±2.47 years; height= 177.8±5.72 cm; body weight=73.74±13.24 kg) visited the laboratory for the testing session. D and ND leg circumferences were measured with a tape measure. After 10 minutes of resting, LOP was then assessed bilaterally in the supine position using an automated BFR device (Cuff width: 10 cm). Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) was used to analyse the relationship between leg circumference and LOP values. A simple linear regression analysis was also conducted on the D and ND legs to determine the predictive relationship between leg circumference and LOP. Paired sample t-test was used to analyse differences for LOP and leg circumferences between D and ND legs. Moderate positive correlation was found between D and ND leg circumference and LOP (r=0.5937, p<0.0001; r=0.5999, p<0.0001), respectively. The linear regression analysis model was found statistically significant (F(1,102):55.51; p<0.0001) with approximately 35.24% of the variance (R²=0.3524) for the D leg and the ND leg (F(1,102):57.34; p<0.0001) with approximately 35.98% of the variance (R²=0.3598). There were significant differences between the D and ND leg for the LOP and leg circumference outcomes (p=0.029; ES: 0.217; p=0.037; ES=0.207), respectively. Our findings suggest that as leg circumference increases, LOP also tends to increase in the lower limbs when assessing LOP with an automated BFR device with a 10 cm cuff width.

Keywords

Supporting Institution

Not applicable

Project Number

Not applicable

Ethical Statement

This study was approved by the Gazi University Ethics Committee with the decision dated May 13, 2025 and numbered 1242357.

Thanks

The authors would like to thank all subjects for their participation.

References

  1. Buckner, S. L., Dankel, S. J., Counts, B. R., Jessee, M. B., Mouser, J. G., Mattocks, K. T., Laurentino, G. C., Abe, T., & Loenneke, J. P. (2017). Influence of cuff material on blood flow restriction stimulus in the upper body. Journal of Physiological Sciences, 67(1), 207-215.
  2. Chulvi-Medrano, I., Cortell-Tormo, J. M., Hernández-Sánchez, S., Picón-Martínez, M., & Rolnick, N. (2023). Blood Flow Restriction Training in Clinical Rehabilitation: Occlusion Pressure Methods Relative to the Limb Occlusion Pressure. J Sport Rehabil, 32(4), 361-368.
  3. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Routledge. de Queiros, Rolnick, N., Schoenfeld, B. J., de França, I. M., Vieira, J. G., Sardeli, A. V., Kamis, O., Neto, G. R., Cabral, B. G. d. A. T., & Dantas, P. M. S. (2024a). Hypertrophic effects of low-load blood flow restriction training with different repetition schemes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PeerJ, 12, e17195.
  4. de Queiros, Rolnick, N., Schoenfeld, B. J., de França, I. M., Vieira, J. G., Sardeli, A. V., Kamis, O., Neto, G. R., Cabral, B. G. d. A. T., & Dantas, P. M. S. (2024a). Hypertrophic effects of low-load blood flow restriction training with different repetition schemes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PeerJ, 12, e17195.
  5. de Queiros, V. S., Rolnick, N., Kamiş, O., Formiga, M. F., Rocha, R. F. C., Alves, J. C. M., Vieira, J. G., Vianna, J. M., Wilk, M., Fostiak, K., Cabral, B. Guilherme d. A. T., & Dantas, P. M. S. (2024b). Body position and cuff size influence lower limb arterial occlusion pressure and its predictors: implications for standardizing the pressure applied in training with blood flow restriction [Original Research]. Frontiers in Physiology, 15.
  6. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175-191.
  7. Hughes, L., Jeffries, O., Waldron, M., Rosenblatt, B., Gissane, C., Paton, B., & Patterson, S. D. (2018). Influence and reliability of lower-limb arterial occlusion pressure at different body positions. PeerJ, 6, e4697.
  8. Hunt, J. E. A., Stodart, C., & Ferguson, R. A. (2016). The influence of participant characteristics on the relationship between cuff pressure and level of blood flow restriction. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 116(7), 1421-1432.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Sports Training

Journal Section

Research Article

Early Pub Date

September 23, 2025

Publication Date

September 26, 2025

Submission Date

June 6, 2025

Acceptance Date

August 20, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 30 Number: 3

APA
Kamiş, O., Akçay, N., Sofuoğlu, C., & Keskin, K. (2025). Relationship Between Leg Circumference and Limb Occlusion Pressure in Dominant and Non-Dominant Legs Using an Automated BFR Device in Healthy Male Individuals. Gazi Journal of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, 30(3), 98-103. https://doi.org/10.53434/gbesbd.1701529

Gazi Journal of Physical Education and Sports Sciences is a scientific and peer-reviewed journal published quarterly.