Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the Emotion Regulation Scale for Athletes

Abstract

Competition or training often continues regardless of the athlete's emotions. An athlete may experience a rapid mood swing during competition or training, and emotion regulation may be the most basic need for athlete. The aim of this study was to adapt and verify the psychometric properties of the Emotion Regulation Scale for athletes. The study consists of four sub-studies, adaptation phase, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, criterion-related validity, and reliability. Initially, the items in the original form were adapted for athletes, and face validity was ensured. As a result of the factor analysis performed with 280 athletes the two-factor structure, "Reappraisal" and "Suppression" revealed as in the original form. As a result of the criterion-related validity study, it was concluded that there was a weak negative correlation between the Emotion Regulation Scale-Brief Form and the Reappraisal, while there was no significant relationship between the Suppression. Cronbach’s alpha internal consistency coefficients of the sub-dimensions were adequate. The test-retest reliability at a two-week interval period indicated moderate stability over time. Overall, results demonstrated that the eight items Athlete Emotion Regulation Scale is a valid and reliable instrument.

Keywords

• Athlete emotion regulation scale
• Reappraisal
• Suppression
• Emotion regulation
• Athlete

Duygu Düzenleme Ölçeğinin Sporcular İçin Uyarlanması ve Psikometrik Özelliklerinin İncelenmesi

Abstract

Bir müsabaka ya da antrenman, çoğu zaman sporcunun duygularından bağımsız olarak devam eder. Sporcu, müsabaka ya da antrenman sırasında hızlı duygu geçişleri yaşayabilir ve bu noktada en temel ihtiyacı duygu düzenleme becerisi olabilir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, Duygu Düzenleme Ölçeğinin sporcular için uyarlanması ve psikometrik özelliklerinin incelenmesidir. Mevcut araştırma, uyarlama aşaması, açımlayıcı ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizi, ölçüt bağıntılı geçerlik ve güvenirlik olmak üzere dört alt çalışmadan oluşmaktadır. Öncelikle orijinal formdaki maddeler sporcular için uyarlanmış ve görünüş geçerliği sağlanmıştır. 280 sporcu ile yapılan faktör analizi sonucunda ölçeğin orijinalinde olduğu gibi “Bilişsel Yeniden Değerlendirme” ve “Bastırma” olmak üzere iki faktörlü bir yapı göstermiştir. Ölçüt bağıntılı geçerlik çalışması sonucunda, Duygu Düzenleme Güçlüğü Ölçeği-Kısa Formu ile Bilişsel Yeniden Değerlendirme arasında negatif yönde zayıf bir ilişki varken Bastırma alt boyutu ile arasında anlamlı bir ilişki olmadığı sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Ölçeğin alt boyutlarının Cronbach’s alpha iç tutarlık katsayılarının yeterli düzeyde olduğu görülmüştür. İki hafta aralıklı olarak uygulanan test-tekrar test güvenirlik analizi, ölçeğin zamana karşı orta düzeyde tutarlı olduğunu göstermiştir. Sonuç olarak, 8 maddeli Sporcu Duygu Düzenleme Ölçeğinin geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme aracı olduğu görülmüştür.

Keywords

• Sporcu duygu düzenleme ölçeği
• Bilişsel yeniden değerlendirme
• Bastırma
• Duygu düzenleme
• Sporcu

References

1. 1. Anuar, N., Cumming, J. ve Williams, S. (2017). Emotion regulation predicts imagery ability. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 36(3), 254-269.
2. 2. Bjureberg, J., Ljótsson, B., Tull, M. T., Hedman, E., Sahlin, H., Lundh, L. G., ... ve Gratz, K. L. (2016). Development and validation of a brief version of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale: the DERS-16. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 38(2), 284-296. DOI: 10.1007/s10862-015-9514-x
3. 3. Comrey, A. L. ve Lee, H. B. (1992). A First Course in Factor Analysis (2. bs.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4. 4. Costello, A. B. ve Osborne, J. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 10(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.7275/jyj1-4868
5. 5. Ekkekakis, P. (2012). Affect, mood, and emotion. G. Tenenbaum, R. C. Eklund ve A. Kamata (Ed.), Measurement in sport and exercise psychology (s. 321–332). Human Kinetics.
6. 6. Eldeleklioğlu, J. ve Eroğlu, Y. (2015). A Turkish adaptation of the emotion regulation questionnaire. Journal of Human Sciences, 12(1), 1157-1168.
7. 7. Ferketich, S. (1991). Focus on psychometrics. Aspects of item analysis. Research in Nursing & Health, 14(2), 165-168. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.4770140211
8. 8. Fonteyn, M. E., Kuipers, B. ve Grobe, S. J. (1993). A description of think aloud method and protocol analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 3(4), 430-441.

9. 9. Gendron, M. (2010). Defining emotion: A brief history. Emotion Review, 2(4), 371-372. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073910374669
10. 10. Gratz, K. L. ve Roemer, L. (2004). Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: Development, factor structure, and initial validation of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 26(1), 41-54. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOBA.0000007455.08539.94
11. 11. Gross, J. J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 271-299. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.271
12. 12. Gross, J. J. (2001). Emotion regulation in adulthood: Timing is everything. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10(6), 214-219.
13. 13. Gross, J. J. (2002). Emotion regulation: Affective, cognitive, and social consequences. Psychophysiology, 39(3), 281-291. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0048577201393198
14. 14. Gross, J. J. ve John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 348. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348
15. 15. Hardesty, D. M. ve Bearden, W. O. (2004). The use of expert judges in scale development: Implications for improving face validity of measures of unobservable constructs. Journal of Business Research, 57(2), 98-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(01)00295-8
16. 16. Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31-36.
17. 17. Leech, N. L., Barrett, K. C. ve Morgan, G. A. (2005). SPSS for intermediate statistics: Use and interpretation (2nd ed). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
18. 18. Martinent, G., Ledos, S., Ferrand, C., Campo, M. ve Nicolas, M. (2015). Athletes’ regulation of emotions experienced during competition: A naturalistic video-assisted study. Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology, 4(3), 188. DOI: 10.1037/spy0000037
19. 19. Mulligan, K. ve Scherer, K. R. (2012). Toward a working definition of emotion. Emotion Review, 4(4), 345-357. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073912445818
20. 20. Salovey, P. ve Mayer, J. D. (1990). Emotional intelligence. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 9(3), 185-211. https://doi.org/10.2190/DUGG-P24E-52WK-6CDG
21. 21. Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H. ve Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23-74. Erişim adresi: http://www.mpr-online.de/
22. 22. Schober, P., Boer, C. ve Schwarte, L. A. (2018). Correlation coefficients: appropriate use and interpretation. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 126(5), 1763-1768.
23. 23. Sharma, S. K. ve Sharma, R. (2016). Comunication and educational technology contemporary pedagogy for health care professionals (2. bs.). Erişim adresi: https://books.google.com.tr/books?id=E_HQDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA364&dq=criterion-validity&hl=tr&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiG48fplMbvAhVj_SoKHU9pBREQ6AEwA3oECAIQAg#v=onepage&q=criterion-validity&f=false
24. 24. Suresh, K. P. ve Chandrashekara, S. (2012). Sample size estimation and power analysis for clinical research studies. Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences, 5(1), 7-13. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3409926/
25. 25. Tabachnick, B. G. ve Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). New York: Harper Collins.
26. 26. Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273-1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
27. 27. Totan, T. (2015). Duygu düzenlenme anketi Türkçe formunun geçerlik ve güvenirliği. Bilişsel Davranışçı Psikoterapi ve Araştırmalar Dergisi, 3, 153-161.
28. 28. Uphill, M. A., Lane, A. M. ve Jones, M. V. (2012). Emotion Regulation Questionnaire for use with athletes. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 13(6), 761-770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2012.05.001
29. 29. Uphill, M. A., McCarthy, P. J. ve Jones, M. V. (2009). Getting a grip on emotion regulation in sport. Advances in applied sport psychology: A review. S. D. Mellalieu ve S. Hanton (Ed.), Advances in applied sport psychology (s. 162-194). New York: Routledge.
30. 30. Vallerand, R. J. ve Blanchard, C. M. (2000). The study of emotion in sport and exercise: Historical, definitional, and conceptual perspectives. In Y. L. Hanin (Ed.), Emotions in sport (s. 3–37). Human Kinetics.
31. 31. Wagstaff, C. R. (2014). Emotion regulation and sport performance. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 36(4), 401-412. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.2013-0257
32. 32. Yaşlıoğlu, M. M. (2017). Sosyal bilimlerde faktör analizi ve geçerlilik: Keşfedici ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizlerinin kullanılması. İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 46, 74-85. Erişim adresi: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/iuisletme/issue/32177/357061
33. 33. Yiğit, İ. ve Guzey-Yiğit, M. (2019). Psychometric properties of Turkish version of difficulties in emotion regulation scale-brief form (DERS-16). Current Psychology, 38, 1503-1511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9712-7
34. 34. Yurtsever, G. (2004). Emotional regulation strategies and negotiation. Psychological Reports, 95(3), 780-786. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.95.3.780-786