Investigation of Pre-service Teachers' Knowledge of Sustainable Development Goals and Sustainable Consumption Behaviors
Abstract
The knowledge, attitudes and behaviors of teachers and pre-service teachers about sustainable development will affect their implementation of sustainable development (SD) education in their classrooms. From this point of view, in this study, pre-service teachers' knowledge of sustainable development goals (SDGs), the sources of this knowledge and their sustainable consumption behaviors (SCBs) were determined as a product of the project supported by Tubitak 2209-A. Survey model was used and data were collected from a total of 1028 pre-service teachers studying in 8 different undergraduate programs at a Faculty of Education. Data collection tools; Sustainable Development Goals Knowledge questions and Sustainable Consumption Behaviors Scale. The data were analyzed using chi-square test of independence and ANOVA. Pre-service teachers' SDGs knowledge levels are low and differs according to gender at low effect size. The knowledge levels of pre-service primary teachers and psychological counseling and guidance teachers are statistically significantly higher than those of pre-service teachers in all other branches. The SDG knowledge scores of pre-service teachers statistically differed between the ones who complete the "Sustainable Development and Education" course and those who not completed, however their consumption behaviors did not differ between them. The SCBs of female pre-service teachers are significantly higher than males in the reuse sub-dimension. A differentiation in the sub-dimensions of pre-service teachers' SCBs is determined according to some of their departments. Based on the findings, it can be suggested that "SD and Education" course should be a must-course in all teacher training programs in order to increase pre-service teachers' knowledge of SDGs and to develop SCBs.
Keywords
Sustainable Development Goals, Sustainable Consumption Behaviors, Pre-service Teachers, Knowledge, Gender
Supporting Institution
The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Türkiye (Tübitak)
Project Number
Tübitak 2209-A 1919B012301894
Ethical Statement
This study was carried out with the approval of Düzce University Scientific Research and Publication Ethics Committee (Date: 24.10.2023; number: 354870).
Thanks
This research is the product of a project supported by TUBITAK. We would like to thank TUBITAK and Düzce University for their support.
References
- Alkış, S. & Öztürk, M. (2007). Sustainable development in opinions of primary student teachers and pre‐service teacher education in Turkey. Geographiedidaktische Forschungen, 42, 134‐143. Regional Symposium of the International Geographical Union Commission on Geographical Education (IGU CGE), July,2007.
- Angarita-Cala, C. (2018). Hey teacher! We need more education: A study of the experiences of Irish Young People of education for sustainable development (ESD) [Unpublished Master’s Thesis], Harvard University.
- Arslan, H. O. & Yağmur, Z. İ. (2022). Fen bilimleri öğretmenlerinin ekolojik ayak izi bilgi düzeyleri ve “sürdürülebilir kalkınma için eğitime” ilişkin görüşleri [Science teachers’ knowledge about ecological footprint and views on “education for sustainable development”]. Uluslararası Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 10(18), 122-150. https://doi.org/10.46778/goputeb.1025127
- Ateş, H. (2018). Fen bilgisi ve sosyal bilgiler öğretmen adaylarının sürdürülebilir tüketim davranışlarının ve bilgi düzeylerinin araştırılması. [Determination of pre-service science teachers’ and pre-service social studies teachers’ sustainable consumption behaviors and knowledge levels]. Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 31(2), 507-531. https://doi.org/10.19171/uefad.505608
- Biçer, R., & Bulut, B. (2023). Öğretmen eğitiminde sürdürülebilir kalkınma eğitiminin yeri ve önemi (Türkiye Örneği). [The Role and Importance of Education for Sustainable Development in Teacher Education (The Case of Turkey)]. Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 24(2), 1215-1252.
- Blum, N., Nazir, J., Breiting, S., Goh, K. C., & Pedretti, E. (2013). Balancing the tensions and meeting the conceptual challenges of education for sustainable development and climate change. Environmental Education Research, 19(2), 206-217.
- Burns, R. (2002). Education and social change: A proactive or reactive Role? International Review of Education, 48(1), 21–45. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015654311613
- Burns, H. L., Kelley, S. S., & Spalding, H. E. (2019). Teaching sustainability: Recommendations for best pedagogical practices. Journal of Sustainability Education, 19, 1–16. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1059&context=elp_fac
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Çabuk, S., Nakiboglu, B. & Keleş, C. (2008). Tüketicilerin yeşil (ürün) satın alma davranışlarının sosyo-demografik değişkenler açısından incelenmesi [Investigation of consumers' green (product) purchasing behavior in terms of socio-demographic variables]. Ç.Ü. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 17(1), 85-102.