Türkiye Century Education Model 2024 middle school mathematics teaching program differentiation through support: Program and teacher perspectives
Abstract
This study aims to examine the “differentiation through support” component included in the Türkiye Century Education Model 2024 Middle School Mathematics Curriculum and to explore teachers’ views on the concept of differentiation. The research was conducted in two stages. In the first stage, the support practices within the curriculum document were evaluated using the document analysis method, during which categories and codes were developed. In the second stage, semi-structured interviews were conducted with ten mathematics teachers to investigate their knowledge, experiences, and awareness regarding differentiation within the curriculum. The study was designed as a qualitative study, and the interview data were analyzed using content analysis. The findings indicate that the curriculum’s support approach is predominantly based on process differentiation, with the most common differentiation practices focusing on concept formation, materials use, and modeling strategies. However, individualized learning practices and those based on students’ interests or learning pace were observed to be limited. Teachers’ views revealed that intuitive experiences in the field primarily drive differentiation in practice, whereas the theoretical guidance provided in the curriculum remains largely unrecognized. Factors such as time constraints, infrastructure, and class size were identified as significant obstacles to implementation. The study emphasizes that differentiation is not only a pedagogical but also an ethical responsibility, suggesting that educational curricula should be structured in a more inclusive, student-centered, and practice-oriented manner.
Keywords
Differentiation, Support, Türkiye Century Education Model
Ethical Statement
This study was approved by the Social and Human Sciences Ethics Committee of Istanbul Medeniyet University. The ethics approval was granted on March 25, 2025, under Decision No. 2025/03 and Official Letter No. E-38510686-050.04-2500022214. All procedures involving human participants were conducted in accordance with institutional and national ethical standards, the Declaration of Helsinki, and applicable regulations. Informed consent was obtained from all participants.
Thanks
The author thanks the teachers who voluntarily participated in the interviews and shared their experiences, which greatly contributed to the development of this study.
References
- Alkan, A., Mertol, H., & Mertol, G. (2020). Özel yetenekli öğrencilerin bilişim teknolojileri derslerinde bir farklılaştırma örneği olarak resfebenin kullanımı [The use of rebus as a differentiation example in specifically teaching students 'computer technology courses]. Avrasya Uluslararası Araştırmalar Dergisi, 8(21), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.33692/avrasyad.702886
- Au, W. (2007). High-stakes testing and curricular control: A qualitative metasynthesis. Educational Researcher, 36(5), 258-267. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X07306523
- Bird, R. (2021). The dyscalculia toolkit: Supporting learning difficulties in maths (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
- Brighton, C. M., Hertberg, H. L., Moon, T. R., Tomlinson, C. A., & Callahan, C. M. (2005). The feasibility of high-end learning in a diverse middle school. National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
- Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory Into Practice, 39(3), 124-130. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2
- Çiftçi, Ş. K., Yıldız, P., & Bozkurt, E. (2015). Ortaokul matematik öğretmenlerinin materyal kullanımına ilişkin görüşleri [Middle school mathematics teachers’ opinions about using material]. Eğitimde Politika Analizi, 4(1), 79–89.
- Deunk, M. I., Jacobse, A. E., de Boer, H., Doolaard, S., & Bosker, R. J. (2018). Effective differentiation practices: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies on the cognitive effects of differentiation practices in primary education. Educational Research Review, 24, 31–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.02.002
- Doğan, A., & Avcıoğlu, A. (2024). İlkokul matematik öğretiminde farklılaştırma örneği olarak resfebenin kullanımı [The use of resfebe as an example of differentiation in primary school mathematics teaching]. Uluslararası Ders Kitapları ve Eğitim Materyalleri Dergisi, 7(2), 156–187. https://doi.org/10.53046/ijotem.1561502
- Doğrukök, B., & Kurnaz, A. (2023). Öğretmen eğitiminde bir model: Sosyal bilgiler öğretmenlerine uygulanan mentor destekli farklılaştırma öğretmen eğitim modelinin özel yetenekli öğrencilerin becerileri üzerindeki etkilerinin incelenmesi [A model in teacher education: ınvestigating the effects of the mentor-assisted differentiation teacher training model applied to social studies teachers on the skills of gifted students]. Millî Eğitim Dergisi, 52(1), 577–600. https://doi.org/10.37669/milliegitim.1309145
- Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551