The role of individual innovativeness levels in the relationship between preservice teachers' lifelong learning tendencies and online learning readiness levels

Abstract

This research aims to examine the role of individual innovativeness levels in the relationship between preservice teachers' lifelong learning tendencies and their readiness levels for online learning. Designed as a study using a predictive correlational design, one of the quantitative research types, the population of the study consists of 5781 preservice teachers studying at the Faculty of Education of a state university in the 2024-2025 academic year. The required sample size was calculated to be 361 people. The sampling method was determined as convenience sampling, one of the non-random sampling methods. The data collection tools are the Lifelong Learning Scale, the Online Learning Readiness Scale, and the Individual Innovativeness Scale. Data were collected online using a form created in Google Forms. The participant group comprises 397 preservice teachers from 23 departments. Of the preservice teachers, 50% of whom are first-year students, 74% are female, and 26% are male. The statistical suitability of the data was checked using various methods. Data analysis was performed on 369 datasets using descriptive statistics, confirmatory factor analysis, and structural equation modeling. According to the findings, preservice teachers' lifelong learning tendencies and online learning readiness were above the moderate level, while their individual innovativeness was low. It was observed that preservice teachers were mostly in the "early majority" type among the individual innovativeness categories. Relationships between preservice teachers' lifelong learning tendencies and online learning readiness levels; between lifelong learning tendencies and individual innovativeness levels; and between online learning readiness levels and individual innovativeness levels were found to be positive, significant, and moderate. Furthermore, it was revealed that the individual innovativeness level variable is a partial mediator variable in the relationship between lifelong learning tendencies and online learning readiness level variables. These results were discussed alongside other research, and various suggestions were presented.

Keywords

• Lifelong Learning
• Individual Innovativeness
• Online Learning Readiness
• Preservice Teachers

References

1. Abbak, Y., & Erdamar, G. (2023). Öğretmenlerin bireysel yenilikçilik düzeyleri ile yenilikçi okul algıları arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi [An investigation of the relationship between the individual innovativeness level of teachers and their perceptions of innovative schools]. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, (60), 226-252. https://doi.org/10.9779/pauefd.1108835
2. Abdalina, L., Bulatova, E., Gosteva, S., Kunakovskaya, L., & Frolova, O. (2022). Professional Development of Teachers in the Context of the Lifelong Learning Model: The Role of Modern Technologies. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 14(1), 117-134. https://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v14i1.6643
3. Akça, B. (2022). Öğretmen adaylarının çoklu zekâ alanları ile yaşam boyu öğrenme eğilimleri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi [Investigation of the relationship between multiple intelligence areas and lifelong learning tendencies of teacher candidates] [Unpublished master's thesis]. Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Türkiye.
4. Akça, F. & Şakar, Z. (2017). Öğretmen adaylarının bireysel yenilikçilik düzeylerinin incelenmesi [Examining the individual innovation levels of preservice teachers]. In Ö. Demirel, & D. Serkan. (Eds.). Küreselleşen Dünyada Eğitim [Education in a Globalized World] (pp. 451-462). Pegem Akademi.
5. Anwar, K., Musa, J., & Salleh, S. M. (2025). From learning to practice: The role of preparation, acceptance, skills, and innovativeness in affecting preservice teacher technology integration. Education and Information Technologies, 30(7), 9041-9067. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13181-1
6. Baki, Y. (2023). Türkçe öğretmeni adaylarinin bireysel yenilikçilik özellikleri [Individual innovation characteristics of prospective Turkish language teachers]. International Journal of Language Academy, 11(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.29228/ijla.70319
7. Bandalos, D. L. (2002). The effects of item parceling on goodness-of-fit and parameter estimate bias in structural equation modeling. Structural equation modeling, 9(1), 78-102. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0901_5
8. Baumgartner, H., & Homburg, C. (1996). Applications of structural equation modeling in marketing and consumer research: A review. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13(2), 139-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8116(95)00038-0

9. Bilici, O., & Bağcı, H. (2020). Öğretmen adaylarının yaşam boyu öğrenme eğilimleri ile e-öğrenmeye hazır bulunuşlukları arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi [Investigation of the relationship between teacher candidates’ lifelong learning tendencies and their readiness for e-learning]. Sakarya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 20(2), 205-219.
10. Biricik, Y. S., Karababa, B., & Sivrikaya, M. H. (2022). Spor bilimleri fakültesi öğrencilerinin bireysel yenilikçilik düzeyleri ve yaşam boyu öğrenme eğilimlerinin incelenmesi [Examination of individual innovation levels and lifelong learning tendencies of students of the Faculty of Sports Sciences]. Mediterranean Journal of Sport Science, 5 (Special Issue 1), 276-294. https://doi.org/10.38021asbid.1201754
11. Blaschke, L. M. (2021). The dynamic mix of heutagogy and technology: Preparing learners for lifelong learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(4), 1629 - 1645. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13105
12. Boyacı, Z. (2019). Öğretmen adaylarının yaşam boyu öğrenme eğilimleri ile dijital okuryazarlık düzeyleri arasındaki ilişki: Düzce Üniversitesi örneği [The relationship between lifelong learning tendencies and digital literacy levels of pre-service teachers (A Düzce University sample)] [Unpublished master's thesis]. Sakarya University, Türkiye.
13. Boztepe, Ö., & Demirtaş, Z. (2016). The adaptation of lifelong learning scale into Turkish culture. Journal of Family Counseling and Education, 1(1), 10-17. https://doi.org/10.32568/jfce.238294
14. Bubou, G. M., & Job, G. C. (2022). Individual innovativeness, self-efficacy and e-learning readiness of students of Yenagoa study centre, National Open University of Nigeria. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 15(1), 2-22. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-12-2019-0079
15. Camayang, J. G., Ventura, A. M. C., & Bautista, R. G. (2023). Innovativeness, self-efficacy, and online learning readiness of pre-service teachers. International Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities (IJSSH), 8(2), 54-72. https://doi.org/10.58885/ijssh.v08i2.54.jc
16. Cirus, L., & Simonova, I. (2021). Pupils’ digital literacy reflected in teachers’ attitudes towards ICT: Case study of the Czech Republic. SN Computer Science, 2(3), 231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-021-00567-y
17. Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (Sixth edition). Routledge.
18. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson.
19. Crowley, S.L., & Fan, X. (1997). Structural equation modeling: Basic concepts and applications in personality assessment research. Emerging Issues and Methods in Personality Assessment, 3891, 285–308. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203774618-24
20. Demir, A., Metin, K. G., & Karataş, İ. H. (2021). Ortaokul öğretmenlerinin girişimcilik ve yenilikçilik düzeyleri: betimsel bir araştırma [The innovativeness and entrepreneurship levels of middle school teachers: a descriptive research]. Medeniyet Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(2), 76-98.
21. Demir-Kaymak, Z. & Horzum, M. B. (2013). Çevrimiçi öğrenme öğrencilerinin çevrimiçi öğrenmeye hazır bulunuşluk düzeyleri, algıladıkları yapı ve etkileşim arasındaki ilişki [Relationship between online learning readiness and structure and interaction of online learning students.]. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 13 (3), 1783-1797.
22. Duymuş, Y., & Sulak, S. (2018). Öğretmen adaylarının yaşam boyu öğrenme eğilimleri üzerinde lisans eğitimi, cinsiyet ve bölümün etkisi [The effect of undergraduate education, gender and department on prospective teachers’ lifelong learning dispositions]. The Journal of Limitless Education and Research, 3(2), 58-74. https://doi.org/10.17860/efd.92694
23. Ekşi, H., Özgenel, M., & Çiftçi, Ç. A. (2021). The predictive role of innovation management with lifelong learning on individual innovativeness: an examination on teachers. International Journal of Educational Leadership and Management. 9(2), 150-176. doi:10.17583/ijelm.2021.5928
24. Elçi, E. (2024). The relationship between digital literacy levels and lifelong learning tendencies of future teachers. South African Journal of Education, 44(4).
25. Erdoğan, D. G., Bayat, S., & Sentürk, Ş. (2017). Pedagojik formasyon öğrencilerinin bit, e-öğrenme ve yaşam boyu öğrenme eğilimleri arasındaki ilişki [The relationship between alternative teacher certification program students’ computer and communication technology, e-learning and lifelong learning tendencies]. Uluslararası Eğitim Programları ve Öğretim Çalışmaları Dergisi, 7 (13), 147-159.
26. Finsterwald, M., Wagner, P., Schober, B., Lüftenegger, M., & Spiel, C. (2013). Fostering lifelong learning–Evaluation of a teacher education program for professional teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29, 144-155.
27. Gallo, M. A., & McKinney, U. O. (2025). Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for Aviation Research. Taylor & Francis.
28. George, A. S. (2023). Preparing students for an AI-driven world: Rethinking curriculum and pedagogy in the age of artificial intelligence. Partners Universal Innovative Research Publication, 1(2), 112-136. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10245675
29. Greenhill, V. (2010). 21st century knowledge and skills in educator preparation. Partnership for 21st century skills. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED519336.pdf
30. Gunness, A., Matanda, M. J., & Rajaguru, R. (2023). Effect of student responsiveness to instructional innovation on student engagement in semi-synchronous online learning environments: The mediating role of personal technological innovativeness and perceived usefulness. Computers & Education, 205, 104884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104884
31. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J. & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th Edition). Pearson.
32. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage.
33. Hung, M. L., Chou, C., Chen, C. H., & Own, Z. Y. (2010). Learner readiness for online learning: Scale development and student perceptions. Computers & Education, 55, 1080–1090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.004
34. Horzum, F. (2019). Çevrimiçi öğrenmeye yönelik hazırbulunuşluk ile algılanan engeller arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi (Sakarya Üniversitesi pedagojik formasyon örneği) [Investigation of the relationship between readiness and perceived barriers for online learning (Sakarya University Pedagogical Formation sample)] [Unpublished master's thesis]. Sakarya University, Türkiye.
35. Hurt, H. T., Joseph, K., & Cook, C. D. (1977). Scales for the measurement of innovativeness. Human Communication Research, 4, 58-65.
36. İskender Birgül, Ö. (2023). Öğretmen adaylarının yaşam boyu öğrenme eğilimlerinin e-öğrenmeye hazırbulunuşluk düzeylerine etkisi [The effect of pre-service teachers' lifelong learning tendencies on their e-learning readiness] [Unpublished master's thesis]. Sakarya University, Türkiye.
37. Kabataş, S. (2019). Öğretmen adaylarının dijital vatandaşlık algılarının yaşam boyu öğrenme tutumları ve e-öğrenmeye hazır bulunuşluğu açısından değerlendirilmesi [Evaluation of teacher candidates' perceptions of digital citizenship in terms of lifelong learning attitudes] [Unpublished master's thesis]. Bartin University, Türkiye.
38. Karakış, Ö., & Demirtaş, Z. (2022). Öğretmen adaylarının yaşam boyu öğrenme eğilimleri ve öğretmenlik mesleğini seçimlerinden duydukları memnuniyetin mesleki yönelim ve kariyer geliştirme arzularını yordaması [Predictions of pre-service teachers' lifelong learning tendency and their satisfaction with their choice of teaching profession on their professional orientation and career development desires]. e-Uluslararası Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 13(5), 77-92. https://doi.org/10.19160/e-ijer.1121973
39. Kılıç, H. (2015). İlköğretim branş öğretmenlerinin bireysel yenilikçilik düzeyleri ve yaşam boyu öğrenme eğilimleri (Denizli ili örneği) [Primary subject teachers’ individual innovativeness levels and lifelong learning tendencies] [Unpublished master's thesis]. Pamukkale University, Türkiye.
40. Kılıçer, K. & Odabaşı, H.F. (2010). Bireysel yenilikçilik ölçeği (BYÖ): Türkçeye uyarlama, geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması [Individual innovativeness scale: the study of adaptation to Turkish, validity and reliability]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 38, 150-164.
41. Kır, Ş., & Bozkurt, A. (2020). Açık ve uzaktan öğrenme anlatılarının yaşam boyu öğrenme kapsamında incelenmesi [Analysis of open and distance learning narratives within a lifelong learning context]. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 8(4), 1298-1322. https://izlik.org/JA52XC24ZL
42. Kline, R. B. (2023). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (5th edition). Guilford publications.
43. Köklü, N., Büyüköztürk, Ş., & Çokluk, Ö. (2007). Sosyal bilimler için istatistik [Statistics for social sciences] (2nd edition). Pegem Yayıncılık.
44. Köse, Z. (2023). Öğretmenlerin öz yönetimli öğrenme ve çevrimiçi öğrenmeye yönelik hazır bulunuşluk düzeyleri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi [Examining the relationship between self-directed learning levels of teachers and readiness for online learning] [Unpublished master's thesis]. Bartin University, Türkiye.
45. Krejcie, R. V. & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607-610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308
46. Lim, Z. Y., Yap, J. H., Lai, J. W., Mokhtar, I. A., Yeo, D. J., & Cheong, K. H. (2024). Advancing lifelong learning in the digital age: A narrative review of Singapore’s Skills Future programme. Social Sciences, 13(2), 73. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci13020073
47. Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural equation modeling, 9(2), 151-173. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_1
48. Lock, J., Lakhal, S., Cleveland‐Innes, M., Arancibia, P., Dell, D., & De Silva, N. (2021). Creating technology‐enabled lifelong learning: A heutagogical approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(4), 1646-1662. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13122
49. Loogma, K., Kruusvall, J., & Ümarik, M. (2012). E-learning as innovation: Exploring innovativeness of the VET teachers’ community in Estonia. Computers & Education, 58(2), 808-817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.005
50. Lopes, C., da Costa, A. B., de Lara, S. M., de Lara, L. L. C., Zoppo, B. M., & Pereira, W. F. (2024). Distance education and lifelong leariıng: pathways for teacher training in the 21st century. Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental, 18(12), 1-13.
51. Malabanan, J. C. L., Briones, E. O., & Madrideo, J. V. (2022). Pre-service teachers’ readiness on online learning and their 21st century pedagogical skills. International Journal of Educational Management and Development Studies, 3(3), 65-83. https://doi.org/10.53378/352909
52. Manbaki, D. (2023). Öğretmenlerin bireysel yenilikçilik düzeyleri ile yaşam boyu öğrenme eğilimlerinin incelenmesi [Investigation of teachers’ individual innovativeness levels and lifelong learning tendencies] [Unpublished master's thesis]. Bursa Uludağ University, Türkiye.
53. Mumcu, F. (2022). Is Personal Innovativeness Decisive in Preservice Teachers’ ICT Competencies?. Instructional Technology and Lifelong Learning, 3(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.52911/itall.1101391
54. Nayci, Ö. (2021). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin bireysel yenilikçilik özellikleri ile çevrim içi eğitimde rol ve yeterlilikleri arasındaki ilişki [The relationship between individual innovativeness characteristics of classroom teachers and their roles and competencies in online education]. Kocaeli Üniversitesi Eğitim Dergisi, 4(1), 108-122. https://doi.org/10.33400/kuje.900806
55. Öztürk-Yurtseven, G., & Aldan-Karademir, Ç. (2017). Pedagojik formasyon eğitimi sertifika programındaki öğretmen adaylarının bireysel yenilikçilik düzeyleri ve yaşam boyu öğrenme eğilimleri [Individual innovativeness levels and lifelong learning tendencies of preservice teachers in pedagogical formation training certificate program]. Eğitim Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi (EBAD), 7(2), 189-206.
56. Parsak, B., & Saraç, L. (2022). Beden eğitimi öğretmenlerinin covid 19 sürecinde çevrimiçi öğrenmeye yönelik hazirbulunuşluk düzeyi [The readiness level of the physical education teachers to online learning during Covid 19]. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 51(233), 489-500. https://doi.org/10.37669/milliegitim.788088
57. Pilli, O., Sönmezler, A., & Göktan, N. (2019). Pre-service teachers’ tendencies and perceptions towards lifelong learning. European Journal of Social Science Education and Research, 6(1), 153-164. https://doi.org/10.26417/ejser.v10i2.p326-333
58. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior research methods, 40(3), 879-891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
59. Purwandari, D., Saparudin, M., Wulan, M., Akbari, D. A., & Kania, A. (2024). Does the lecturers’ innovativeness drive online-learning adoption in higher education? A study based on extended TAM. Jurnal Sisfokom (Sistem Informasi dan Komputer), 13(2), 280-287. https://doi.org/10.32736/sisfokom.v13i2.2122
60. Rogers, E. (2003). Diffusion of innovations 5th. Free Press.
61. Rusek, M., Stárková, D., Chytrý, V., & Bílek, M. (2017). Adoption of ICT innovations by secondary school teachers and pre-service teachers within chemistry education. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 16(4), 510-523. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/17.16.510
62. Steffens, K. (2015). Competences, learning theories and MOOCs: Recent developments in lifelong learning. European Journal of Education, 50(1), 41-59. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12102
63. Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations. Psychological methods, 7(4), 422.
64. Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach's alpha. International journal of medical education, 2, 53. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd
65. Tekin, H. (1993). Eğitimde ölçme ve değerlendirme [Measurement and evaluation in education]. Yargı Yayınevi.
66. Thwe, W. P., & Kálmán, A. (2023). The regression models for lifelong learning competencies for teacher trainers. Heliyon, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13749
67. Torunlar, S. (2022). Yaşam boyu öğrenmenin çevrimiçi öğrenmeye hazırbulunuşluk üzerindeki etkileri [The effects of lifelong learning on readiness for online learning] [Unpublished master's thesis]. Bursa Uludağ University, Türkiye.
68. Twum, K. K., Ofori, D., Keney, G., & Korang-Yeboah, B. (2022). Using the UTAUT, personal innovativeness and perceived financial cost to examine student’s intention to use E-learning. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 13(3), 713-737. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-12-2020-0168
69. Uslu, E. M., Akdemir, A., & Genç, S. Z. (2023). Öğretmen adaylarının dijital okuryazarlıkları ile yaşam boyu öğrenme becerileri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi [Examination of the relationship between the digital literacy and the life long learning skills of pre-service teachers]. Trakya Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 25(1), 283-302. https://doi.org/10.26468/trakyasobed.1183684
70. Wielkiewicz, R. M., & Meuwissen, A. S. (2014). A lifelong learning scale for research and evaluation of teaching and curricular effectiveness. Teaching of Psychology, 41(3),220-227. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628314537971
71. Yakar, L., & Yakar, Z. Y. (2021). Eğitim fakültesi öğrencilerinin uzaktan eğitime karşı tutumlarının ve e-öğrenmeye hazır bulunuşluklarının incelenmesi [Investigation of attitudes towards distance education and readiness for e-learning of education faculty students]. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.17860/mersinefd.781097
72. Yasa, H. D. (2018). Öğretmen adaylarının yaşam boyu öğrenme eğilimleri ile bilgi okuryazarlığı becerileri arasındaki ilişkinin değerlendirilmesi [Analysis of the relationship between the lifelong learning tendencies and information literacy skills of teacher candidates] [Unpublished master's thesis]. Bartin University, Türkiye.
73. Yenice, N., & Tunç, G. A. (2019). Öğretmen adaylarının yaşam boyu öğrenme eğilimleri ile bireysel yenilikçilik düzeylerinin incelenmesi [An investigation of pre-service teachers’ lifelong learning tendencies and their individual innovativeness levels]. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 27(2), 753-765. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.2716
74. Yenice, N., & Yavaşoğlu, N. (2018). Fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının bireysel yenilikçilik düzeyleri ile bireysel yaratıcılıkları arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi [The investigation of the relationship between individual innovative levels and individual creatives of science teacher candidates]. Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama, 14(2), 107-128. https://doi.org/10.17244/eku.334590
75. Yıldırım, Y. (2021). Ortaokul öğretmenlerinin yaşam boyu öğrenme düzeyleri ile bireysel yenilikçilik düzeyleri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi [The relationship between lifelong learning levels and individual innovation levels of secondary school teachers] [Unpublished master's thesis]. İstanbul Sabahattin Zaim University, Türkiye.