Research Article

A comparative analysis of the 2018 and 2024 religious culture and ethics curricula (grades 9–12) within the Türkiye century education model

Number: Advanced Online Publication Early Pub Date: May 23, 2026
EN

A comparative analysis of the 2018 and 2024 religious culture and ethics curricula (grades 9–12) within the Türkiye century education model

Abstract

The objectives and content of religious education in schools are determined by curriculum frameworks. The purpose of this study is to identify the similarities and differences between the 2018 Religious Culture and Ethics Course (Grades 9–12) curriculum and the 2024 curriculum developed within the framework of the Türkiye Century Education Model. This study is based on the analysis of the 2018 and 2024 Religious Culture and Ethics curricula. Employing qualitative research methods, the study utilizes document analysis as its primary data collection technique. Both curricula were examined in terms of their educational philosophies, fundamental approaches, vision, teaching principles, instructional methods and techniques, assessment and evaluation strategies, the role of teachers, the teaching of values and concepts, learning environments, instructional resources, and unit structures. Both curricula adopt a student-centered approach to religious and moral education. However, the 2024 curriculum, developed in line with contemporary educational and theological approaches, addresses the philosophical and pedagogical foundations in greater depth than the 2018 curriculum. It places greater emphasis on family, environment, and technology, thereby linking religious and moral education to current social issues. Furthermore, the 2024 curriculum provides more concrete guidance regarding instructional processes, aiming to reduce potential implementation challenges for teachers. Significant revisions have also been made at the unit level; new units have been introduced, while some existing units have been merged or expanded in scope. Overall, the revisions to the 2024 Religious Culture and Ethics curriculum aim to strengthen both the theoretical framework and the practical implementation of religious education.

Keywords

Religious Education, Curriculum, Türkiye Century Education Model, Religious Culture and Ethics Course

Ethical Statement

Since the research was conducted using the document analysis method, ethics committee approval was not obtained. Ethical principles were observed throughout all stages of the research and the writing process.

References

  1. Akpınar, B., Özer, B., Oral, B., & Köksalan, B. (2024). Türkiye Yüzyılı Maarif Modelinin program geliştirme ve felsefi düzlemden analizi [An analysis of the century of Türkiye Maarif model from program development and philosophical perspectives]. EKEV Akademi Dergisi, (99), 59-73. https://doi.org/10.17753/sosekev.1489135
  2. Akturan, U. (2008). Doküman incelemesi [Document review]. In T. Baş & U. Akturan (Eds.), Nitel araştırma yöntemleri NVivo ile nitel veri analizi, örnekleme, analiz, yorum [Qualitative research methods Qualitative data analysis with NVivo, sampling, analysis, interpretation] (pp. 117-123). Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  3. Akyürek, S. (2004). Din öğretiminde kavram öğretimi [Concept teaching in religious education]. Dem Yayınları.
  4. Altaş, N. (2003). Felsefenin temel soruları bağlamında orta öğretimde felsefe öğretimi ve Din Kültürü Ahlak Bilgisi öğretimi i̇lişkisi (öğretim programları ve ders kitapları üzerinde karşılaştırmalı bir değerlendirme) [the relationship between philosophy education and religious culture and moral knowledge education in secondary schools in the context of the fundamental questions of philosophy: A comparative evaluation of curricula and textbooks]. Ankara Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 44(1), 227-270. https://doi.org/10.1501/Ilhfak_0000000120
  5. Altıntaş, E. (2025). Türkiye Yüzyılı Maarif Modeli kapsamında 12. Sınıf Kur’an-ı Kerim dersi öğretim programı’nın incelenmesi [An analysis of the 12th grade Quranic studies curriculum under the Türkiye century education model]. SocioReligio Journal of Sociology of Religion, 1(1), 13-23.
  6. Arslankara, V. B., & Arslankara, E. (2024). Türkiye Yüzyılı Maarif Modeli’nin felsefi temelleri: Ontolojik, epistemolojik ve aksiyolojik bakış açılarından bir değerlendirme [Philosophical foundations of the Türkiye century maarif model: an evaluation from ontological, epistemological and axiological perspectives]. İstanbul Eğitim Dergisi, 1(1), 121-145. https://doi.org/10.71270/istanbulegitim.istj.1557889
  7. Bahar, M., Nartgün, Z., Durmuş, S., & Bıçak, B. (2015). Geleneksel-tamamlayıcı ölçme ve değerlendirme teknikleri: Öğretmen el kitabı [Traditional-complementary measurement and evaluation techniques: Teacher’s handbook]. Pegem Akademi.
  8. Banaz, E. (2024). 2024 Türkiye Yüzyılı Maarif Modeli ortaokul Türkçe dersi öğretim programı’nın dijital okuryazarlık açısından i̇ncelenmesi [2024 Türkiye century education model examination of secondary school Turkish curriculum in terms of digital literacy]. Kuram ve Uygulamada Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 8(1), 279-290. https://doi.org/10.48066/kusob.1483671
  9. Batmaz, O. (2023). İ̇lkokulda milli-manevi değerlerin kazanımında sosyal ve kültürel faaliyetlerin etkisi (The effect of social and cultural activities on the acquisition of national-spiritual values in primary school]. e-Uluslararası Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 14(2), 170-183. https://doi.org/10.19160/e-ijer.1224318
  10. Bayrakdar, N. (2025). Türkiye Yüzyılı Maarif Modeli Ortaöğretim Din Kültürü ve Ahlak Bilgisi dersi öğretim programı’nda beyin fırtınası tekniği [Brainstorming technique in the Turkish century education model secondary education religious culture and ethics course teaching program]. Türkiye Din Eğitimi Araştırmaları Dergisi, (19), 129-157.
APA
Can Kaynak, Ç. (2026). A comparative analysis of the 2018 and 2024 religious culture and ethics curricula (grades 9–12) within the Türkiye century education model. International Journal of Turkish Education Sciences, Advanced Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.46778/goputeb.1830635
AMA
1.Can Kaynak Ç. A comparative analysis of the 2018 and 2024 religious culture and ethics curricula (grades 9–12) within the Türkiye century education model. IJTES. 2026;(Advanced Online Publication). doi:10.46778/goputeb.1830635
Chicago
Can Kaynak, Çiğdem. 2026. “A Comparative Analysis of the 2018 and 2024 Religious Culture and Ethics Curricula (grades 9–12) Within the Türkiye Century Education Model”. International Journal of Turkish Education Sciences, no. Advanced Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.46778/goputeb.1830635.
EndNote
Can Kaynak Ç (May 1, 2026) A comparative analysis of the 2018 and 2024 religious culture and ethics curricula (grades 9–12) within the Türkiye century education model. International Journal of Turkish Education Sciences Advanced Online Publication
IEEE
[1]Ç. Can Kaynak, “A comparative analysis of the 2018 and 2024 religious culture and ethics curricula (grades 9–12) within the Türkiye century education model”, IJTES, no. Advanced Online Publication, May 2026, doi: 10.46778/goputeb.1830635.
ISNAD
Can Kaynak, Çiğdem. “A Comparative Analysis of the 2018 and 2024 Religious Culture and Ethics Curricula (grades 9–12) Within the Türkiye Century Education Model”. International Journal of Turkish Education Sciences. Advanced Online Publication (May 1, 2026). https://doi.org/10.46778/goputeb.1830635.
JAMA
1.Can Kaynak Ç. A comparative analysis of the 2018 and 2024 religious culture and ethics curricula (grades 9–12) within the Türkiye century education model. IJTES. 2026. doi:10.46778/goputeb.1830635.
MLA
Can Kaynak, Çiğdem. “A Comparative Analysis of the 2018 and 2024 Religious Culture and Ethics Curricula (grades 9–12) Within the Türkiye Century Education Model”. International Journal of Turkish Education Sciences, no. Advanced Online Publication, May 2026, doi:10.46778/goputeb.1830635.
Vancouver
1.Çiğdem Can Kaynak. A comparative analysis of the 2018 and 2024 religious culture and ethics curricula (grades 9–12) within the Türkiye century education model. IJTES. 2026 May 1;(Advanced Online Publication). doi:10.46778/goputeb.1830635