Research Article

Forecasting Performance Comparison: LSTM Model vs. Dynamic and Static Forecasting of ARIMA and Random Walk Models - Evidence from S&P500

Volume: 39 Number: 1 January 30, 2026
EN

Forecasting Performance Comparison: LSTM Model vs. Dynamic and Static Forecasting of ARIMA and Random Walk Models - Evidence from S&P500

Abstract

This paper re-evaluates the forecasting performance of Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) models against traditional Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) and Random Walk (RW) models using S&P 500 index data. The LSTM models in the literature, which utilize observed lagged values for their forecasting (static forecasting), are compared to traditional models that use recursive, self-generated predictions for forecasting (dynamic forecasting). To provide comparable statistics, we gather relevant statistics for the static forecasting of ARIMA and RW models. We repeat the exercise for three different cross-validation schemes. The empirical evidence presented here suggests that the static forecasting power of static ARIMA and RW models consistently matches or outperforms that of LSTMs. Moreover, we find that while traditional models remain robust across varying sample sizes, the performance of LSTMs decreases when the training datasets are reduced. The empirical evidence presented here suggests that the reported superiority of LSTM in financial time series forecasting might be due to the forecasting method that is employed rather than a genuine predictive advantage.

Keywords

References

  1. [1] Box, G. E. P., Jenkins, G. M., Reinsel, G. C., Ljung, G. M., “Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control”, John Wiley and Sons, (2015).
  2. [2] Hamilton, J. D., “Time Series Analysis”, Princeton University Press, (1994).
  3. [3] Deboeck, G. J., “Trading on the Edge: Neural, Genetic, and Fuzzy Systems for Chaotic Financial Markets”, (39), John Wiley and Sons, (1994).
  4. [4] Abu-Mostafa, Y. S., Atiya, A. F., “Introduction to financial forecasting”, Applied Intelligence, 6, 205-213, (1996).
  5. [5] Schmidhuber, J., “Deep learning in neural networks: An overview”, Neural Networks, 61, 85-117, (2015).
  6. [6] Jothi, L. S., “Time Series Analysis Using LSTM Networks and Its Application to Financial Forecasting”, In Artificial Intelligence for Financial Risk Management and Analysis, 19-58, IGI Global Scientific Publishing, (2025).
  7. [7] Hochreiter S., Schmidhuber J., “Long Short-Term Memory”, Neural Computation MIT-Press, 9(8), 1735-1780, (1997).
  8. [8] Roondiwala, M., Patel, H., Varma, S., “Predicting stock prices using LSTM”, International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 6(4), 1754-1756, (2017).

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Deep Learning, Neural Networks, Statistical Theory, Statistical Data Science, Applied Statistics

Journal Section

Research Article

Early Pub Date

January 30, 2026

Publication Date

January 30, 2026

Submission Date

May 30, 2025

Acceptance Date

December 30, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 39 Number: 1

APA
Gül, L., Yüksel Haliloğlu, E., Sevgi, N. H., Doğan, N., & Berument, H. (2026). Forecasting Performance Comparison: LSTM Model vs. Dynamic and Static Forecasting of ARIMA and Random Walk Models - Evidence from S&P500. Gazi University Journal of Science, 39(1), 499-522. https://doi.org/10.35378/gujs.1709484
AMA
1.Gül L, Yüksel Haliloğlu E, Sevgi NH, Doğan N, Berument H. Forecasting Performance Comparison: LSTM Model vs. Dynamic and Static Forecasting of ARIMA and Random Walk Models - Evidence from S&P500. Gazi University Journal of Science. 2026;39(1):499-522. doi:10.35378/gujs.1709484
Chicago
Gül, Levent, Ebru Yüksel Haliloğlu, Nurhan Hande Sevgi, Nükhet Doğan, and Hakan Berument. 2026. “Forecasting Performance Comparison: LSTM Model Vs. Dynamic and Static Forecasting of ARIMA and Random Walk Models - Evidence from S&P500”. Gazi University Journal of Science 39 (1): 499-522. https://doi.org/10.35378/gujs.1709484.
EndNote
Gül L, Yüksel Haliloğlu E, Sevgi NH, Doğan N, Berument H (March 1, 2026) Forecasting Performance Comparison: LSTM Model vs. Dynamic and Static Forecasting of ARIMA and Random Walk Models - Evidence from S&P500. Gazi University Journal of Science 39 1 499–522.
IEEE
[1]L. Gül, E. Yüksel Haliloğlu, N. H. Sevgi, N. Doğan, and H. Berument, “Forecasting Performance Comparison: LSTM Model vs. Dynamic and Static Forecasting of ARIMA and Random Walk Models - Evidence from S&P500”, Gazi University Journal of Science, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 499–522, Mar. 2026, doi: 10.35378/gujs.1709484.
ISNAD
Gül, Levent - Yüksel Haliloğlu, Ebru - Sevgi, Nurhan Hande - Doğan, Nükhet - Berument, Hakan. “Forecasting Performance Comparison: LSTM Model Vs. Dynamic and Static Forecasting of ARIMA and Random Walk Models - Evidence from S&P500”. Gazi University Journal of Science 39/1 (March 1, 2026): 499-522. https://doi.org/10.35378/gujs.1709484.
JAMA
1.Gül L, Yüksel Haliloğlu E, Sevgi NH, Doğan N, Berument H. Forecasting Performance Comparison: LSTM Model vs. Dynamic and Static Forecasting of ARIMA and Random Walk Models - Evidence from S&P500. Gazi University Journal of Science. 2026;39:499–522.
MLA
Gül, Levent, et al. “Forecasting Performance Comparison: LSTM Model Vs. Dynamic and Static Forecasting of ARIMA and Random Walk Models - Evidence from S&P500”. Gazi University Journal of Science, vol. 39, no. 1, Mar. 2026, pp. 499-22, doi:10.35378/gujs.1709484.
Vancouver
1.Levent Gül, Ebru Yüksel Haliloğlu, Nurhan Hande Sevgi, Nükhet Doğan, Hakan Berument. Forecasting Performance Comparison: LSTM Model vs. Dynamic and Static Forecasting of ARIMA and Random Walk Models - Evidence from S&P500. Gazi University Journal of Science. 2026 Mar. 1;39(1):499-522. doi:10.35378/gujs.1709484