USING CLUSTER ANALYSIS TO DEFINE THE POSITION OF A DEVELOPING COUNTRY IN GLOBAL TRANSPORTATION SERVICES TRADE ENVIRONMENT

Abstract

Liberalization of services brought a competitive environment where governments on the one hand try to get access to the markets of the most competitive sectors for them, and on the other hand they try to protect their local suppliers against sector’s global giants. Although several developing countries have participated in the globalization of services, still some developing countries show resistance to process of liberalization in services, as they do not see themselves as possessing much of comparative advantage in the production and exchange of services. In recent years, publication of statistical data on services trade, has allowed researchers make international comparisons in macro level. In this study, Turkey’s position in global services trade environment is explored in the case of transport sector. The place of Turkey among 148 member countries of World Trade Organization is evaluated by cluster analysis with respect to transportation services trade indicators.

The results show that current position of Turkey in global services trade market is far from being competitive. The recruitments necessary for Turkey to gain its competitiveness are proved by scenario analyses.

Keywords

• Liberalization of services,GATS; transport sector; cluster analysis; Turkey

References

1. Artis, M. J., Zhang, W., “Core and periphery in EMU: A cluster analysis”, Economic Issues Journal Articles, 6(2), 47-58, (2001).
2. Boreiko, D., “EMU and accession countries: Fuzzy cluster analysis of membership”, International Journal of Finance & Economics, 8(4): 309-325, (2003).
3. Chanda, R., GATS and its implications for developing countries: Key issues and concerns, ST/ESA/2002/DP.25 DESA Discussion Paper No. 25, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations, New York,(2002).
4. Das, J., DiRienzo, C., “Diversity and the economy: a cross-country, comprehensive study”, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 37(6): 1080-1100, (2014).
5. Dunning, J. H., “Explaining the international direct investment position of countries: towards a dynamic or developmental approach”, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 117(1): 30-64, (1981).
6. Francois, J., Hoekman, B., “Services trade and policy”, Journal of Economic Literature. 48(3): 642-692, (2010).
7. Francois, J. F., Wooton, I., “Trade in international transport services: the role of competition”, Review of International Economics, 9(2): 249-261. (2001).
8. Freund, C., Weinhold, D., “The Internet and international trade in services”, American Economic Review, 236-240, (2002).

9. Gelir İdaresi Başkanlığı, GATT Bilgilendirme Rehberi, Gelir İdaresi Başkanlığı Avrupa Birliği ve Dış İlişkiler Daire Başkanlığı GATT (90) Müdürlüğü Yayın No: 95, Ankara, (2009).
10. Hirschberg, J. G., Maasoumi, E., Slottje, D. J., “Cluster analysis for measuring welfare and quality of life across countries”, Journal of Econometrics, 50(1): 131-150, (1991).
11. Kimura, F., Ando, M., Fujii, T., Estimating the ad valorem equivalent of barriers to foreign direct investment in the maritime and air transportation service sectors in Russia, The Word Bank http://siteresources. worldbank. org/INTRANETTRADE/Resources/Topics/kimura-Ando-Fujii-RussiaTransport. pdf. (2004).
12. Montalbano, P., Nenci, S., The trade competitiveness of southern emerging economies: A multidimensional approach through cluster analysis.The World Economy, 37(6): 783-810, (2014).
13. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), GATS: The Case for Open Services Markets, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development,(2002).
14. Oum, T. H., Yu, C., Zhang, A., “Global airline alliances: international regulatory issues”, Journal of Air Transport Management, 7(1): 57-62. (2001).
15. Roelandt, T. J., Den Hertog, P., “Cluster analysis and cluster-based policy making in OECD countries: an introduction to the theme”, Boosting innovation: The cluster approach, 9-23, (1999).
16. Ronen, S., Shenkar, O., “Clustering countries on attitudinal dimensions: A review and synthesis”, Academy of management Review, 435-454, (1985).
17. Saint-Arnaud, S., Bernard, P., “Convergence or resilience? A hierarchical cluster analysis of the welfare regimes in advanced countries”, Current sociology, 51(5): 499-527, (2003).
18. Sauvé, P., 13. Developing countries and the GATS 2000 Round, Trading Services in the Global Economy, 257 (2002).
19. Sauvé, P., Stern, R. M. (Eds.), GATS 2000: New directions in services trade liberalization, Brookings Institution Press, (2010).
20. Schettkat, R., & Yocarini, L., “The shift to services employment: A review of the literature”, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 17(2): 127-147, (2006).
21. UN, Manual on statistics of international trade in services, Statistical papers series M no. 86, Department of Economic and Social Affairs Statistics Division, Geneva, Luxembourg, New York, Paris, Washington, D.C. (2002).
22. UN, Manual on statistics of international trade in services (MSITS 2010). ST/ESA/M.86/Rev. 1, Department of Economic and Social Affairs Statistics Division. Geneva, Luxembourg, New York, Paris, Washington, D.C., (2012).
23. www. wto.org
24. Zhang, A., Zhang, Y., “Issues on liberalization of air cargo services in international aviation”, Journal of Air Transport Management, 8(5): 275-287, (2002).