Research Article

Electrical Energy Demand Prediction: A Comparison Between Genetic Programming and Decision Tree

Volume: 33 Number: 1 March 1, 2020
EN

Electrical Energy Demand Prediction: A Comparison Between Genetic Programming and Decision Tree

Abstract

Several recent studies have used various data mining techniques to obtain accurate electrical energy demand forecasts in power supply systems. This paper, for the first time, compares the efficiency of the decision tree (DT) and classic genetic programming (GP) data mining models developed for electrical energy demand forecasting in Nicosia, Northern Cyprus. The models were trained and tested using daily electricity consumptions measured during the period 2011-2016 and were compared in terms of three statistical performance indices including coefficient of determination, mean absolute percentage error and concordance coefficient. The prediction results showed that the proposed models can be effectively applied to forecasts of electrical energy demand. The results also indicated that the GP is slightly superior to DT in terms of the performance indices.

Keywords

References

  1. Aghaei, J., & Alizadeh, M. I. (2013). Demand response in smart electricity grids equipped with renewable energy sources: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 18, 64-72.
  2. Azadeh, A., Ghaderi, S. F., & Sohrabkhani, S. (2008). Annual electricity consumption forecasting by neural network in high energy consuming industrial sectors. Energy Conversion and management, 49(8), 2272-2278.
  3. Bakhshaii, A., & Stull, R. (2012). Electric load forecasting for western Canada: A comparison of two non-linear methods. Atmosphere-Ocean, 50(3), 352-363.
  4. Balk, B., & Elder, K. (2000). Combining binary decision tree and geostatistical methods to estimate snow distribution in a mountain watershed. Water Resources Research, 36(1), 13-26.
  5. Bhattacharya, M., Abraham, A., & Nath, B. (2002). A linear genetic programming approach for modelling electricity demand prediction in Victoria. In Hybrid Information Systems, 379-393. Physica, Heidelberg, Berlin, Germany Springer-Verlag.
  6. Breiman, L., J. Friedman, R. Olshen, and C. Stone, Classification and Regression Trees, Wadsworth, Belmont, Calif., 1984.
  7. Çunkaş, M., & Taşkiran, U. (2011). Turkey's electricity consumption forecasting using genetic programming. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 6(4), 406-416.
  8. Danandeh Mehr A., Bagheri, F., & Reşatoğlu, R. (2018a) “A genetic programming approach to forecast daily electricity demand. 13th International Conference on Theory and Applications of Fuzzy Systems and Soft Computing. Warsaw, Poland, 27–28 August.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Engineering

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

March 1, 2020

Submission Date

April 16, 2019

Acceptance Date

July 28, 2019

Published in Issue

Year 2020 Volume: 33 Number: 1

APA
Danandeh Mehr, A., Bagheri, F., & Safari, M. J. S. (2020). Electrical Energy Demand Prediction: A Comparison Between Genetic Programming and Decision Tree. Gazi University Journal of Science, 33(1), 62-72. https://doi.org/10.35378/gujs.554463
AMA
1.Danandeh Mehr A, Bagheri F, Safari MJS. Electrical Energy Demand Prediction: A Comparison Between Genetic Programming and Decision Tree. Gazi University Journal of Science. 2020;33(1):62-72. doi:10.35378/gujs.554463
Chicago
Danandeh Mehr, Ali, Farzaneh Bagheri, and Mir Jafar Sadegh Safari. 2020. “Electrical Energy Demand Prediction: A Comparison Between Genetic Programming and Decision Tree”. Gazi University Journal of Science 33 (1): 62-72. https://doi.org/10.35378/gujs.554463.
EndNote
Danandeh Mehr A, Bagheri F, Safari MJS (March 1, 2020) Electrical Energy Demand Prediction: A Comparison Between Genetic Programming and Decision Tree. Gazi University Journal of Science 33 1 62–72.
IEEE
[1]A. Danandeh Mehr, F. Bagheri, and M. J. S. Safari, “Electrical Energy Demand Prediction: A Comparison Between Genetic Programming and Decision Tree”, Gazi University Journal of Science, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 62–72, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.35378/gujs.554463.
ISNAD
Danandeh Mehr, Ali - Bagheri, Farzaneh - Safari, Mir Jafar Sadegh. “Electrical Energy Demand Prediction: A Comparison Between Genetic Programming and Decision Tree”. Gazi University Journal of Science 33/1 (March 1, 2020): 62-72. https://doi.org/10.35378/gujs.554463.
JAMA
1.Danandeh Mehr A, Bagheri F, Safari MJS. Electrical Energy Demand Prediction: A Comparison Between Genetic Programming and Decision Tree. Gazi University Journal of Science. 2020;33:62–72.
MLA
Danandeh Mehr, Ali, et al. “Electrical Energy Demand Prediction: A Comparison Between Genetic Programming and Decision Tree”. Gazi University Journal of Science, vol. 33, no. 1, Mar. 2020, pp. 62-72, doi:10.35378/gujs.554463.
Vancouver
1.Ali Danandeh Mehr, Farzaneh Bagheri, Mir Jafar Sadegh Safari. Electrical Energy Demand Prediction: A Comparison Between Genetic Programming and Decision Tree. Gazi University Journal of Science. 2020 Mar. 1;33(1):62-7. doi:10.35378/gujs.554463

Cited By