Research Article

Determination of The Best Injection Stretch Blow Molding Process Parameters in Polyethylene Terephthalate Bottle Service Performance

Volume: 35 Number: 4 December 1, 2022
EN

Determination of The Best Injection Stretch Blow Molding Process Parameters in Polyethylene Terephthalate Bottle Service Performance

Abstract

Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottles which are thermoplastic materials are used very commonly for the storage and transport of carbonated beverages. The most used production method for PET bottles is the Injection Stretch Blow Molding (ISBM) process. There is a variety of parameters affecting the produced PET bottles’ performances. Amongst these parameters, stretch rod movement, blowing pressure and preform surface temperature are the most important ones. Assignation of the optimal design parameters in PET bottles is taken into account. The effects of the parameters such as Preform Temperature (°C), Stretch Rod Position (mm) and Final Pressure (Bar) were analysed with the Taguchi method (TM), Grey relational analysis (GRA) and ECHIP. Body-weight (gr) (R1), Top Load (Pa) (R2), Burst Pressure (Bar) (R3), Stress Crack Resistance (Min.) (R4) and Tg (oC) (R5) were consiedered as performance parameters. The experimental design proposed by Taguchi involves using orthogonal arrays. An L9 orthogonal array was chosen for the procedure. Primarily, the performance parameters were optimized with the ECHIP Design of the Experiment (DOE). Thereafter, all of the factors were optimized together with TM, GRA and ECHIP.

Keywords

Supporting Institution

Erciyes University

Project Number

FYL-2016-6999

References

  1. [1] Demirel, B., Daver, F., Yaraş, A., “Simulation of stress distribution in the base of pet bottles under different processing conditions”, 6th International Advanced Technologies Symposium, Elazığ, 1-5, (2011).
  2. [2] Demirel, B., Daver, F., Kosior, E., “Petaloid bases of PET bottles: Design and process optimisation against environmental stress cracking”, SPE ANTEC, Cincinnati, 2159-2164, (2007).
  3. [3] McEvoy, J. P., Armstrong, C. G., Crawford, R. J., “Simulation of the stretch blow molding process of PET bottles”, Advances in Polymer Technology, 17: 339-352, (1998).
  4. [4] Martin, L., Stracovsky, D., Laroche, D., Bardetti, A., Ben-Yedder, R., Di Raddo, R., “Modelling and experimental validation of the stretch blow molding of PET”, SPE ANTEC, New York, 982-987, (1999).
  5. [5] Yang, Z. J., Jones, E. H., Menary, G. H., Armstrong, C. G., “A non-isothermal finite element model for injection stretch-blow molding of PET bottles with parametric studies”, Polymer Engineering and Science, 44: 1379-1390, (2004).
  6. [6] Hanley, T., Sutton, D., Cookson, D., Koisor, E., Knott, R., “Molecular morphology of petaloid bases of PET bottles: a small-angle X-ray scattering study”, Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 99: 3328-3335, (2006).
  7. [7] Demirel, B., “Optimization of mold surface temperature and bottle residence time in mold for carbonated soft drink PET containers”, Polymer Testing, 60: 220-228, (2017).
  8. [8] Monteix, S., Schmidt, F., Le Maoult, Y., Ben Yedder, R., Diraddo, R. W., Laroche, D., “Experimental study and numerical simulation of preform or sheet exposed to infrared radiative heating”, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 119: 90-97, (2011).

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Engineering

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

December 1, 2022

Submission Date

March 16, 2020

Acceptance Date

December 28, 2021

Published in Issue

Year 2022 Volume: 35 Number: 4

APA
Akkurt, F., Demirel, B., Usal, İ. A., & Şenyiğit, E. (2022). Determination of The Best Injection Stretch Blow Molding Process Parameters in Polyethylene Terephthalate Bottle Service Performance. Gazi University Journal of Science, 35(4), 1297-1316. https://doi.org/10.35378/gujs.704371
AMA
1.Akkurt F, Demirel B, Usal İA, Şenyiğit E. Determination of The Best Injection Stretch Blow Molding Process Parameters in Polyethylene Terephthalate Bottle Service Performance. Gazi University Journal of Science. 2022;35(4):1297-1316. doi:10.35378/gujs.704371
Chicago
Akkurt, Fatih, Bilal Demirel, İpek Adeviye Usal, and Ercan Şenyiğit. 2022. “Determination of The Best Injection Stretch Blow Molding Process Parameters in Polyethylene Terephthalate Bottle Service Performance”. Gazi University Journal of Science 35 (4): 1297-1316. https://doi.org/10.35378/gujs.704371.
EndNote
Akkurt F, Demirel B, Usal İA, Şenyiğit E (December 1, 2022) Determination of The Best Injection Stretch Blow Molding Process Parameters in Polyethylene Terephthalate Bottle Service Performance. Gazi University Journal of Science 35 4 1297–1316.
IEEE
[1]F. Akkurt, B. Demirel, İ. A. Usal, and E. Şenyiğit, “Determination of The Best Injection Stretch Blow Molding Process Parameters in Polyethylene Terephthalate Bottle Service Performance”, Gazi University Journal of Science, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 1297–1316, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.35378/gujs.704371.
ISNAD
Akkurt, Fatih - Demirel, Bilal - Usal, İpek Adeviye - Şenyiğit, Ercan. “Determination of The Best Injection Stretch Blow Molding Process Parameters in Polyethylene Terephthalate Bottle Service Performance”. Gazi University Journal of Science 35/4 (December 1, 2022): 1297-1316. https://doi.org/10.35378/gujs.704371.
JAMA
1.Akkurt F, Demirel B, Usal İA, Şenyiğit E. Determination of The Best Injection Stretch Blow Molding Process Parameters in Polyethylene Terephthalate Bottle Service Performance. Gazi University Journal of Science. 2022;35:1297–1316.
MLA
Akkurt, Fatih, et al. “Determination of The Best Injection Stretch Blow Molding Process Parameters in Polyethylene Terephthalate Bottle Service Performance”. Gazi University Journal of Science, vol. 35, no. 4, Dec. 2022, pp. 1297-16, doi:10.35378/gujs.704371.
Vancouver
1.Fatih Akkurt, Bilal Demirel, İpek Adeviye Usal, Ercan Şenyiğit. Determination of The Best Injection Stretch Blow Molding Process Parameters in Polyethylene Terephthalate Bottle Service Performance. Gazi University Journal of Science. 2022 Dec. 1;35(4):1297-316. doi:10.35378/gujs.704371

Cited By