Evaluation of Relationship of Spatial Planning-Georisks and Urban Risk Analysis: The Case Study of Bartin
Abstract
While Turkey is located on a geography having the natural hazards which cause disasters such as earthquake, flood, landslide and the like, a lot of settlement areas are exposed to the risks on various levels caused by these hazards. The spatial planning approach including urban risk evaluation studies for the identification of previously the hazard occurring risks and the detection of the damage levels will help to reduce the losses which will be occurred by the negative social and economical effects of the disaster-sensitive planning approach. The urban planning should be designed as the problem solver and dynamic process to create the healthy, safety and survival urban environment, and the risk decreasing measurements should be necessary in the planning process. In a study carried out in this period, the evaluation related to the geoscientific data was performed on the identification of the disaster risks for the urban planning by the risk analysis method and the least diminishing of the disaster harms by the measurements taken in the planning period. As the sample area, Bartin city was chosen because it includes the earthquake, flood and over flood together. The urban risk evaluation caused by the geological factors in Bartin city was tackled by the analysis input creation for the disaster- sensitive planning approach and disaster risk management. The urban disaster risk and damage level were assessed by analyzing GIS for each risk factor and land use decisions and by relating to the regulatory development plan covering the available land uses of the city to the complied geoscientific data.
Key Words: Disaster, georisk, urban risk, GIS, Bartin.
Keywords
References
- Greiving, S., Fleischhauer, M., Luckenkotter, J., “A Assessment of Spatially Relevant Hazards”, Journal Management, 49(1): 1-19 (2006). Risk of Environmental Planning and
- Balamir, M., “Afet Politikası, Risk ve Planlama”, TMMOB Afet Sempozyumu, Ankara, 120-124 (2007).
- Erdik, M., Durukal, E., Birol, Y., Birgören, G., “İstanbul’da Binalar için Deprem Risk Senaryosu ve Risk Azaltımına Yönelik Somut Bir Öneri”, Kentlerin Depreme Hazırlanması ve İstanbul Gerçeği Sempozyumu, İstanbul, 207-227 (2002).
- Sarp, N., “Sağlık Hizmetlerinde Afet Yönetimi”, Deprem Araştırma Enstitüsü Bülteni, 81 (26): 14- 15 (1999).
- Krätzschmar, E., Böhm, C., “Urban Risk Assessment on the Basis of Land Use and Change Detection Mapping”, 1st EARSeL Workshop of the SIG Urban Remote Sensing, Humboldt- Universität zu Berlin (2006).
- Greiving, S., Fleischhauer, M., Wanczura, S., “Management Of Natural Hazards İn Europe: The Role Of Spatial Planning in Selected Eu Member States”, Journal Of Environmental Planning And Management, 49(5): 739-757 (2006).
- Sey, Y., Tapan, M., “Afet Sonrasında Barınma ve Geçici Konut Sorunu”, BİB Afet İsleri Genel Müdürlüğü, Ankara, 33-34 (1987).
- Fleischhauer, M., Greiving, S., Wanczura, S., “Spatial Planning in The Focus of Hazard and Risk Assessment/Management in Europe”, EURO- RIOB Conference “Exchange of experiences connected with flood prevention”, Wrocław, 156- 158 (2005).
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
-
Journal Section
-
Publication Date
March 27, 2010
Submission Date
March 27, 2010
Acceptance Date
-
Published in Issue
Year 2009 Volume: 22 Number: 4