Urban Transformation: a Case Study on 7 Çukurambar, Ankara

Abstract

The social and economic development in mid 20^th century Turkey has inevitably resulted in a rapid urbanization process that has determined the form of big cities. As  society experienced huge social transformation, the cities have been powerfully shaped by the illegal squatter settlements, built by the immigrated population for their urgent needs for shelter on seized lands.  The demand for shelter has transformed into a complex social, economic, cultural and political problem that could not be solved  yet. The aim of this paper is to analyze the urban transformation to find some clues for the solution of gecekondu and urbanization problems. For this, the paper focuses on the Çukurambar neighborhood, an original gecekondu area in Ankara that differs from many examples developing on public land. Çukurambar  is an interesting example with a strategic location in Ankara, where the land is privately owned. This area without an organized urban transformation project, left to market mechanism in a speculative way, ignoring gecekondu population living there. Hence, the paper explains the rapid transformation of the Çukurambar neighborhood, from gecekondu area into high rise housing blocks, highlights its socio-spatial impact on the character of the urban space of Ankara and identifies a unique market led solution in this case.

 

Keywords: Urban transformation, gecekondu, high-rise residential buildings, Çukurambar, Ankara

Keywords

• Urban transformation, gecekondu, high-rise residential buildings, Çukurambar, Ankara

References

1. [1] Devecigil, P.T., “Urban Transformation Projects as a Model to Transform Gecekondu Areas in Turkey: The Example of DikmenValley – Ankara”, European Journal of Housing Policy, Vol. 5, No. 2, 211–229, (2005).
2. [2] Şenyapılı, T. and Türel A., “Ankara’da Gecekondu Oluşum Süreci ve Ruhsatlı Konut Sunumu”, Batıbirlik Yayınları No 1, Ankara, 5-10 (1996).
3. [3] Şenyapılı, T., “Cumhuriyet’in 75. yılı, gecekondunun 50. Yılı”, in Y.Sey (ed.), “75 Yılda Değişen Kent ve Mimarlık”, Tarih Vakfı Yayınları, İstanbul, pp.301-316, (1998).
4. [4] Dündar, Ö., “Kentsel Dönüşüm Uygulamalarının Sonuçları Üzerine Kavramsal Bir Tartışma”, Kentsel Dönüşüm Sempozyumu Bildiriler Kitabı, TMMOB Şehir Plancıları Odası Yayını, pp.65-74, (2003).
5. [5] Ankara Metropolitan Municipality Department of Development Report 2-9 (2000).
6. [6] Malusardi, F. and Occhipinti G. “Informal Settlements Upgrading: the Gececondus in Ankara”, 39th ISoCaRP Congress Proceedings, Cairo, 4-9 (2003), http://www.isocarp.org/Data/case_studies/374.pdf, visited on 06/04/2004.
7. [7] Dündar, Ö., “Changing Meanings of Urban Renewal: Ankara Dikmen Valley Development Project”, Ph.D. Thesis, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, METU, 109-115 (1997).
8. [8] Ankara Municipality AYBİS Urban Information System Data CD, (2000).

9. [9] DİE 2000 Census Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu, 2000 yılı Genel Nüfus Sayımı; Nüfusun Sosyal ve Ekonomik Nitelikleri; http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreIstatistikTablo.do?istab_ id=213, 20/04/2005.
10. [10] Winayanti, L. and Lang G H.C., “Provision of Urban Services in an Informal Settlement: A Case Study of Kampung Penas Tanggul, Jakarta”, Habitat International, 28(1), pp.41-65, (2004).
11. [11] Ankara Metropolitan Municipality, Çukurambar Karakusunlar Revizyon Nazım İmar Planı Raporu, Department of Development, 7-11 (1990).
12. [12] IKONOS satellite image taken form INTA Inc., (2003).
13. [13] Google Earth Image 2006 http://www.earth.google.com, 26/02/2006.