A Preliminary Environmental Assessment of Power Generation Systems for a Stand-Alone Mobile House with Cradle to Gate Approach

Abstract

Due to the sporadic characteristics of solar and wind power it has been a challenge to generate a highly reliable power with photovoltaic and or wind turbines alone. A fuel cell as a supplementary energy source is an alternative to overcome this challenge. PV/wind/fuel cell hybrid power system may be a feasible solution for stand-alone applications. In this study, which is a preliminary work of a comprehensive Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), comparison of the power generation alternatives in terms of environmental impacts by evaluating their environmental and energy efficiencies and impacts during the productions of the system components was given. Also, impacts during the production of wind turbines, PV panels, fuel cells and diesel generators were inspected. Eco-Indicator 99 impact assessment method was used as the impact assessment method. It was shown that the in human health and ecosystem quality damage categories the PV panels are less environmentally efficient when compared with other power generation technologies with similar capacities.

Keywords

• Photovoltaic
• Fuel cell
• Life Cycle Assessment
• Stand-alone

References

1. Curran M.A., “Life Cycle Assessment: Principles and Practice, Scientific Applications International Cooperation Report”, EPA/600/R-06/060, National Risk Management Research Laboratory Office of Research and Development - U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Cincinnati, Ohio, (2006).
2. Ardente F., Beccali G., Cellura M. ve Lo Brano V., “Life Cycle Assessment of a Solar Thermal Collector”, Renewable Energy 30:1031–1054 (2005).
3. Pehnt M.: “Dynamic Life Cycle Assessment of Renewable Energy Technologies”, Renewable Energy 31: 55 – 71(2006).
4. Goedkoop M.; Schryver A. D.; Oele M.: “Introduction to LCA with SimaPRO 7”, PRé Consultants, Amersfoort, Netherlands, (2008).
5. Garcia-Valverde R.; Miguel C.; Martinez-Béjar R.; Urbina A.: “Life Cycle Assessment Study of a 4.2 kWp Stand-alone Photovoltaic System”, Solar Energy 83:1434 – 1445 (2009).
6. Varun; Prakash, R., Bhat, I.K., “Energy, economics and environmental impacts of renewable energy systems”, Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews 13: 2716 – 2721 (2009).
7. Granovskii, M., Dincer, I., Rosen, M.A., ”Exergetic life cycle assessment of hydrogen production from renewables”, Journal of Power Sources 167: 461 – 471 (2007).
8. Lee, J.Y. et al., “Life cycle environmental and economic analyses of a hydrogen station with wind energy”, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 35:2213 – 2225 (2010)

9. Deshmukh, M.K. ve Deshmukh, S.S., “Modeling of Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 12(1):235–249 (2008).
10. Zahedi A., “Technical Analysis of an Electric Power System Consisting of Solar Pv Energy, Wind Power, and Hydrogen Fuel Cell”, Universities Power Engineering Conference AUPEC, 1-5, September (2007).
11. Alam M.S.; Gao D.W.: “Modeling and Analysis of a Wind/PV/Fuel Cell Hybrid Power System in HOMER Industrial Electronics and Applications”, 2nd IEEE Conference on ICIEA, 1594-1599 (2007).
12. Tafreshi S.M.M.; Hakimi S.M.: “Optimal Sizing of a Stand-Alone Hybrid Power System via Particle Swarm Optimization (Pso)”, Power Engineering Conference IPEC, 960-965 (2007).
13. Lagorse J.; Simoes M.G.; Miraoui A.; Costerg P.: “Energy Cost Analysis Of A Solar-Hydrogen Hybrid Energy System For Stand-Alone Applications”, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2nd World Congress of Young Scientists on Hydrogen Energy Systems 33(12):2871-2879 (2008).
14. Eroglu M. et al., “A Stand-alone Mobile House Using PV/Wind/Fuel Cell Hybrid Power System”, 3rd World Congress of Young Scientists on Hydrogen Energy Systems, (October 2009).
15. ISO. ISO 14040. Environmental management – life cycle assessment – Principles and framework, (1997).
16. Ecoinvent Centre, 2007 Ecoinventnext term Centre, 2007. previous termEcoinventnext term Data v2.0 (2007) – The Life Cycle Inventory Data Version. Dübendorf, CH. http://www.ecoinvent.org/de/.
17. Schleisner L., “Comparative life-cycle assessment of a small wind turbine for residential off grid use”, Renewable Energy 20, 279 – 288 (2000)
18. Pehnt M., “Life-cycle assessment of fuel cell stacks”, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 26, 91 – 101 (2001).
19. Goedkoop M., Spriensma R., “Eco-Indicator 99 – A damage oriented method for life cycle impact assessment”, PRé Consultants, Amersfoort, Netherlands, (2001).
20. Blonk T. J. et al., “Drie referentieniveaus voor normalisatie in LCA [Three reference levels for normalisation in LCA]”, RIZA and the Ministry of Environment, Lelystad, the Netherlands (1997).
21. Alsema E.A., De Wild-Scholten M.J., “Environmental impacts of crystalline silicon photovoltaic module production”, 13th CIRP International Conference on Life Cycle Engineering, (June 2006).