A Simple Selection Method of PV Systems for University Campuses

Year 2023, Volume: 36 Issue: 3, 954 - 963, 01.09.2023

Marıam Bara , Gülsu Ulukavak Harputlugil

https://doi.org/10.35378/gujs.1059033

Abstract

This paper briefly outlines part of the research work being carried out on the application of the photovoltaic systems to cover universities’ electrical energy needs, with due consideration to the technical, architectural, economic, social. and legal aspects and impacts of this application. The paper considers optimizing the PV system selection objectives and methodology with a case study application. at a university campus in Ankara, Turkey. The main objective here is to develop a practical simple method of selecting an optimum PV system that gives the maximum energy yield possible in a certain period of one year, with the minimum specific energy cost per kWh, where a multiple-variable multi-criteria decision-making making method is applied, to help designers and system engineers in selecting the optimum system. The developed method is demonstrated in the example of the typical case, where the recommended PV system was turned out to be at an Azmuth angle of 0 degrees, the PV technology was monocrystelline Silicon, the annual electrical energy yield per 100 m2 of PV modules surface area 22.4 MWH/Year, the specific electrical energy cost was 0.15 Euos/Kwh, as a first merit option, making a difference of around 13% of saving compared with the 10th last option. The work concludes that a viable PV application is feasible, encouraging its application in various campuses provided that comprehensive planning and careful considerations are given to the related aspects.

Keywords

PV systems, University Campus, Optimization, MCDM

Supporting Institution

Libyan Govenment Scholarship

Thanks

This paper is one part of the PhD study of Çankaya University PhD in Design Program PhD fellow Mariam BARA. Her PhD study is supported by the Libyan Govenment.

References

• [1] Streimikiene, D., Balezentis, T., Krisciukaitienė, I., Balezentis, A.,“Prioritizing Sustainable Electricity Production Technologies: MCDM Approach”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(5): 3302-3311,‏ (2012).
• [2] Zhong, B., Hei, Y., Jiao, L., Luo, H., Tang, J.,“Technology Frontiers of Building-Integrated Photovoltaics (BIPV): A Patent Co-citation Analysis”, International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, 15(2): 241-252,‏ (2020).
• [3] Amer, M., Daim, T. U.,“Selection of Renewable Energy Technologies for a Developing County: A Case of Pakistan”, Energy for Sustainable Development, 15(4): 420-435, (2011).
• [4] Lu, Y., Chang, R., Shabunko, V., Yee, A. T. L.,“The Implementation of Building-Integrated Photovoltaics in Singapore: Drivers Versus Barriers”, Energy, 168: 400-408, (2019).‏
• [5] Rosa, F.,“Building-Integrated Photovoltaics (BIPV) in Historical Buildings: Opportunities and Constraints”, Energies, 13(14): 3628,‏ (2020).
• [6] Samir, H., Ali, N. A.,“Applying Building-Integrated Photovoltaics (Bıpv) in Existing Buildings, Opportunities and Constrains in Egypt”, Procedia Environmental Sciences, 37: 614-625, (2017)‏.
• [7] Bhutto, Y. A., Mahar, M. A., Larik, A. S., Bhellar, S. H., Khuwahar, A.,“Analysis of Photovoltaic System at Various Sites of Pakistan Using Retscreen Software”, Engineering Science and Technology International Research Journal, 2: 7-13, (2018)‏.
• [8] Goh, K. C., Goh, H. H., Yap, A. B. K., Masrom, M. A. N., Mohamed, S., “Barriers and Drivers of Malaysian BIPV Application: Perspective of Developers”, Procedia Engineering, 180: 1585-1595, (2017).‏
• [9] Al Garni, H. Z., Awasthi, A, “A Monte Carlo Approach Applied to Sensitivity Analysis of Criteria Impacts on Solar PV Site Selection”, Handbook of Probabilistic Models, edited by P. Samui Dieu, Tien Bus...Ravish C. Defo, Butterworth-Heinemann,489-504. (2020)‏.
• [10] Brand, B., Missaoui, R., “Multi-Criteria Analysis of Electricity Generation Mix Scenarios in Tunisia”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 39: 251-261,‏ (2014).
• [11] Aguacil Moreno, S., Rey, E., “Active Renovation Strategies with Building-Integrated Photovoltaics (BIPV). Application on an Early 20thCentury Multi-family Building”, Proceedings of the 8th Euro-American Congress. Rehabend. Construction Pathology, Rehabilitation Technology and Heritage Management, Granada, Spain, (2020)‏.
• [12] Kuhn, T. E., Erban, C., Heinrich, M., Eisenlohr, J., Ensslen, F., Neuhaus, D. H., “Review of Technological Design Options for Building Integrated Photovoltaics (BIPV)”, Energy and Buildings, 231: 110381, (2020).
• [13] Farghaly, Y., Hassan, F., “A Simulated Study of Building Integrated Photovoltaics (BIPV) as an Approach For Energy Retrofit in Buildings”, Energies, 12(20): 3946, (2019).
• [14] Chianese, D., Cereghetti, N., Rezzonico, S., Travaglini, G., “Types of PV Modules Under The Lens”, Sixteenth European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference 2418-2421, Routledge, (2020).‏
• [15] Guacil, S., Lufkin, S., Rey, E.,“Active Surfaces Selection Method For Building-Integrated Photovoltaics (BIPV) in Renovation Projects Based on Self-Consumption and Self-Sufficiency”, Energy and Buildings, 193: 15-28,‏ (2019).
• [16] Attoye, D. E., Adekunle, T. O., Tabet Aoul, K. A., Hassan, A., Attoye, S. O., “A Conceptual Framework for a Building Integrated Photovoltaics (BIPV) Educative-Communication Approach”, Sustainability, 10(10): 3781, (2018)‏.
• [17] Biyik, E., Araz, M., Hepbasli, A., Shahrestani, M., Yao, R., Shao, L., Atlı, Y. B., “A Key Review of Building Integrated Photovoltaic (BIPV) Systems”, Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal, 20(3): 833-858, (2017).
• [18] Georgopoulou, E., Lalas, D., Papagiannakis, L., “A Multicriteria Decision Aid Approach for Energy Planning Problems: The Case of Renewable Energy Option”, European Journal of Operational Research, 103(1): 38-54, (1997).
• [19] Dermaut, J., Greoraent, “A Better Understanding of Green Gas Emission for Different Energy Vectors and Applications”, WEC Conference 17, Houston, Texas, 13-18 September, (1998).
• [20] Balat, H., “Solar Energy Potential in Turkey”, Energy Exploration & Exploitation, 23(1): 61-69, (2005)
• [21] Streimikiene, D., Balezentis, T., Krisciukaitienė, I., Balezentis, A., “Prioritizing Sustainable Electricity Production Technologies: MCDM Approach”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(5): 3302-3311,‏ (2012).
• [22] Van Geet, O. D., Polly, B. J., Pless, S., Heeter, J. S., Shepherd, R.,“Zero Energy University Campuses: A 2018 Progress Update on Reaching Campus Energy Goals” (No. NREL/CP-7A40-71822), National Renewable Energy Lab.(NREL), Golden, CO (United States),‏ (2018).
• [23] Gholami, H., Røstvik, H. N., Müller-Eie, D., “Holistic Economic Analysis of Building Integrated Photovoltaics (BIPV) System: Case Studies Evaluation”, Energy and Buildings, 203: 109461,‏ (2019).
• [24] Gholami, H., Røstvik, H. N., Kumar, N. M., Chopra, S. S., “Lifecycle Cost Analysis (LCCA) of Tailor-Made Building Integrated Photovoltaics (BIPV) Façade: Solsmaragden Case Study in Norway”, Solar Energy, 211: 488-502, (2020)‏.
• [25] Carrington, G., Stephenson, J., “The Politics of Energy Scenarios: Are International Energy Agency and Other Conservative Projections Hampering the Renewable Energy Transition?”, Energy Research and Social Science, 46: 103-113,‏ (2018).
• [26] Mermoud, A., Wittmer, B., “Bifacial Shed Simulation with PVSyst” Bifacial Workshop, Germany, 25-26, (2017).