EN
Machine Learning Approaches for Differentiating Thermophilic and Mesophilic Lipases
Abstract
Differentiating thermophilic proteins from their mesophilic counterparts presents a significant challenge, yet achieving this distinction is crucial for the rational design of more stable proteins. In this study, a systematic analysis was performed on 3,715 unreviewed bacterial lipase enzymes obtained from the UniProt web server and screened according to their Tm values. Furthermore, a tree was constructed using the MEGA 11 program and lipase sequences from different families were selected. The final dataset consists of 88 mesophilic proteins and 123 thermophilic proteins were used. We found that Ile, Leu, aliphatic index, hydropathy, aliphatic amino acids, hydrophobic amino acids, tiny amino acids, and small amino acids are the key variables distinguishing thermophilic from mesophilic lipase proteins. These findings suggest that amino acid composition is crucial in differentiating these two groups.
Keywords
References
- Ahmed, Z., Zulfiqar, H., Tang, L., & Lin, H. (2022). A statistical analysis of the sequence and structure of thermophilic and non-thermophilic proteins. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23(17), 10116. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231710116
- Alataş, E., Tanyıldızı Kökkülünk, H., Tanyıldızı, H., & Alcın, G. (2023). Treatment prediction with machine learning in prostate cancer patients. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2023.2298364
- Albayrak, A., & Sezerman, U. O. (2012). Discrimination of thermophilic and mesophilic proteins using reduced amino acid alphabets with n-grams. Current Bioinformatics, 7(2), 152-158. https://doi.org/10.2174/157489312800604435
- Ai, H., Zhang, L., Zhang, J., Cui, T., Chang, A. K., & Liu, H. (2018). Discrimination of thermophilic and mesophilic proteins using support vector machine and decision tree. Current Proteomics, 15(5), 374-383. https://doi.org/10.2174/1570164615666180718143606
- Capriotti, E., Fariselli, P., & Casadio, R. (2004). A neural-network-based method for predicting protein stability changes upon single point mutations. Bioinformatics, 20, 63-68. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bth928
- Capriotti, E., Fariselli, P., & Casadio, R. (2005). I-Mutant2.0: predicting stability changes upon mutation from the protein sequence or structure. Nucleic Acids Research, 33(2), 306-310. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gki375
- Chakravorty, D., Faheem Khan, M., & Patra, S. (2017). Thermostability of proteins revisited through machine learning methodologies: From nucleotide sequence to structure. Current Biotechnology, 6(1), 39-49. https://doi.org/10.2174/2211550105666151222183232
- Charoenkwan, P., Chotpatiwetchkul, W., Lee, V. S., Nantasenamat, C., & Shoombuatong, W. (2021). A novel sequence-based predictor for identifying and characterizing thermophilic proteins using estimated propensity scores of dipeptides. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 23782. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-03293-w
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Bioinformatics and Computational Biology (Other)
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Publication Date
December 30, 2024
Submission Date
September 30, 2024
Acceptance Date
October 25, 2024
Published in Issue
Year 2024 Volume: 11 Number: 4
APA
Vardar Yel, N. (2024). Machine Learning Approaches for Differentiating Thermophilic and Mesophilic Lipases. Gazi University Journal of Science Part A: Engineering and Innovation, 11(4), 701-710. https://doi.org/10.54287/gujsa.1558391
AMA
1.Vardar Yel N. Machine Learning Approaches for Differentiating Thermophilic and Mesophilic Lipases. GU J Sci, Part A. 2024;11(4):701-710. doi:10.54287/gujsa.1558391
Chicago
Vardar Yel, Nurcan. 2024. “Machine Learning Approaches for Differentiating Thermophilic and Mesophilic Lipases”. Gazi University Journal of Science Part A: Engineering and Innovation 11 (4): 701-10. https://doi.org/10.54287/gujsa.1558391.
EndNote
Vardar Yel N (December 1, 2024) Machine Learning Approaches for Differentiating Thermophilic and Mesophilic Lipases. Gazi University Journal of Science Part A: Engineering and Innovation 11 4 701–710.
IEEE
[1]N. Vardar Yel, “Machine Learning Approaches for Differentiating Thermophilic and Mesophilic Lipases”, GU J Sci, Part A, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 701–710, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.54287/gujsa.1558391.
ISNAD
Vardar Yel, Nurcan. “Machine Learning Approaches for Differentiating Thermophilic and Mesophilic Lipases”. Gazi University Journal of Science Part A: Engineering and Innovation 11/4 (December 1, 2024): 701-710. https://doi.org/10.54287/gujsa.1558391.
JAMA
1.Vardar Yel N. Machine Learning Approaches for Differentiating Thermophilic and Mesophilic Lipases. GU J Sci, Part A. 2024;11:701–710.
MLA
Vardar Yel, Nurcan. “Machine Learning Approaches for Differentiating Thermophilic and Mesophilic Lipases”. Gazi University Journal of Science Part A: Engineering and Innovation, vol. 11, no. 4, Dec. 2024, pp. 701-10, doi:10.54287/gujsa.1558391.
Vancouver
1.Nurcan Vardar Yel. Machine Learning Approaches for Differentiating Thermophilic and Mesophilic Lipases. GU J Sci, Part A. 2024 Dec. 1;11(4):701-10. doi:10.54287/gujsa.1558391