Research Article

Run-length performance of AE-I and AE-II mean charts under phase-I parameter estimation

Volume: 55 Number: 5 October 28, 2026
EN

Run-length performance of AE-I and AE-II mean charts under phase-I parameter estimation

Abstract

Adaptive exponentially weighted moving average charts are effective tools for detecting small-to-moderate shifts in a process mean. In practical applications, however, the incontrol mean and standard deviation are usually unknown and must be estimated from Phase I data before Phase II monitoring begins. This estimation uncertainty can affect both false-alarm behaviour and out-of-control detection performance. Although the adaptive exponentially weighted moving average-I chart has been studied under parameter estimation, the corresponding run-length behaviour of the parameter-free adaptive exponentially weighted moving average-II chart has not been systematically examined. This study evaluates the adaptive exponentially weighted moving average-II mean chart when process parameters are estimated from Phase I samples and compares it with the adaptive exponentially weighted moving average-I chart under a common in-control average run length calibration. Monte Carlo simulations with 100,000 replications are conducted to obtain zero-state and steady-state run-length profiles for different Phase I sample sizes and mean-shift magnitudes. Overall performance is summarized using integrated relative average run length and relative mean index measures. In addition to the normal model, a heavy-tailed t-distribution setting is considered as a robustness check. We also use a real industrial piston-ring dataset to illustrate practical implementation. The results show that parameter-estimation effects are strongest when the number of Phase I subgroups is small and diminish as m increases. Under calibrated in-control performance, the adaptive exponentially weighted moving average-II chart generally detects small-to-moderate shifts faster, whereas the adaptive exponentially weighted moving average-I chart remains competitive for moderate and mixed-range shifts.

Keywords

References

  1. [1] W. Albers and W.C.M. Kallenberg, Are estimated control charts in control?, Statistics 38 (1), 67–79, 2004.
  2. [2] H. AlQadi, W. Abdelfattah, T. Abbas, A.A.H. Ahmadini, A.I.A. Sayed and B. Ahmad, Design of an EWMA control chart by adaptation of smoothing constant based on a function of estimated shift, Sci. Rep. 15 (1), 24730, 2025.
  3. [3] A.A. Aly, N.A. Saleh, M.A. Mahmoud and W.H. Woodall, A reevaluation of the adaptive EWMA control chart when parameters are estimated, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int. 31 (8):1611–1622, 2015.
  4. [4] G. Capizzi and G. Masarotto, An adaptive exponentially weighted moving average control chart, Technometrics 45 (3), 199–207, 2003.
  5. [5] G. Chen, The mean and standard deviation of the run length distribution of $\bar{X}$ charts when control limits are estimated, Stat. Sin. 7 (3), 789–798, 1997.
  6. [6] Y. Dai, Y. Luo, Z. Li and Z.Wang, A new adaptive CUSUM control chart for detecting the multivariate process mean, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int. 27 (7), 877–884, 2011.
  7. [7] N. M. Gunaime, Adaptive EWMA control chart using MLP-ANN for real-time shift detection, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int. 41 (7), 3137–3160, 2025.
  8. [8] D. Han and F. Tsung, A reference-free CUSCORE chart for dynamic mean change detection and a unified framework for charting performance comparison, J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 101 (473), 368–386, 2006.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Statistical Quality Control

Journal Section

Research Article

Early Pub Date

September 8, 2026

Publication Date

October 28, 2026

Submission Date

February 14, 2026

Acceptance Date

August 27, 2026

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 55 Number: 5

APA
Shahab, W. H., Farroqi, A. A. H., Farroqi, F. H., & Ahmad, Z. (2026). Run-length performance of AE-I and AE-II mean charts under phase-I parameter estimation. Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, 55(5), 2352-2375. https://doi.org/10.15672/hujms.1889210
AMA
1.Shahab WH, Farroqi AAH, Farroqi FH, Ahmad Z. Run-length performance of AE-I and AE-II mean charts under phase-I parameter estimation. Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics. 2026;55(5):2352-2375. doi:10.15672/hujms.1889210
Chicago
Shahab, Waqar Hassan, Abdul Ahad Hassan Farroqi, Fahad Hassan Farroqi, and Zahoor Ahmad. 2026. “Run-Length Performance of AE-I and AE-II Mean Charts under Phase-I Parameter Estimation”. Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics 55 (5): 2352-75. https://doi.org/10.15672/hujms.1889210.
EndNote
Shahab WH, Farroqi AAH, Farroqi FH, Ahmad Z (October 1, 2026) Run-length performance of AE-I and AE-II mean charts under phase-I parameter estimation. Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics 55 5 2352–2375.
IEEE
[1]W. H. Shahab, A. A. H. Farroqi, F. H. Farroqi, and Z. Ahmad, “Run-length performance of AE-I and AE-II mean charts under phase-I parameter estimation”, Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 2352–2375, Oct. 2026, doi: 10.15672/hujms.1889210.
ISNAD
Shahab, Waqar Hassan - Farroqi, Abdul Ahad Hassan - Farroqi, Fahad Hassan - Ahmad, Zahoor. “Run-Length Performance of AE-I and AE-II Mean Charts under Phase-I Parameter Estimation”. Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics 55/5 (October 1, 2026): 2352-2375. https://doi.org/10.15672/hujms.1889210.
JAMA
1.Shahab WH, Farroqi AAH, Farroqi FH, Ahmad Z. Run-length performance of AE-I and AE-II mean charts under phase-I parameter estimation. Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics. 2026;55:2352–2375.
MLA
Shahab, Waqar Hassan, et al. “Run-Length Performance of AE-I and AE-II Mean Charts under Phase-I Parameter Estimation”. Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, vol. 55, no. 5, Oct. 2026, pp. 2352-75, doi:10.15672/hujms.1889210.
Vancouver
1.Waqar Hassan Shahab, Abdul Ahad Hassan Farroqi, Fahad Hassan Farroqi, Zahoor Ahmad. Run-length performance of AE-I and AE-II mean charts under phase-I parameter estimation. Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics. 2026 Oct. 1;55(5):2352-75. doi:10.15672/hujms.1889210