Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

A Contemporary Analysis on the Clash of Civilisation Debate

Year 2025, Volume: 2 Issue: 2 , 112 - 120 , 06.01.2026
https://doi.org/10.26650/hupej.2025.2.2.5012026
https://izlik.org/JA54FS68DD

Abstract

This paper gives a thorough analysis of the thesis of Clash of Civilisations by Samuel P. Huntington and its applicability to the modern international relations. It frames the discussion in the context of global order of the twenty first century which is in a change whereby the role of religion, identity and culture henceforth determines the relationships between states and transnational. The research takes a case study approach of qualitative study, studying two prominent but understudied settings, namely Nigeria-Israel relations and Muslim solidarity in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Based on secondary information gathered through scholarly literature, documents of the diplomatic archives, and other foreign reports during the period of 2020-2025, the analysis probes on the manner in which the notions of civilisational identity that are imagined as a sense of belonging entrenched in common religious and cultural discourses still impact the global alignments and perceptions of the self and the other. Results suggest that despite the fact that in the globalised world, civilisation lines are being erased by means of cultural hybridisation and digital interconnectivity. Within the study, the author observe an irony; although civilisational narratives have the potential to make people across national boundaries feel connected and sympathetic, they also threaten to strengthen polarised fault lines that perpetuate conflict. Critics have long held that Huntington is too deterministic and essentialist but evidence of recent crises, including the 2023-2025 Gaza escalations provides an outlook that identity-based solidarities still have a significant explanatory role to play. The author proposes a new and empirically based approach to the clash of civilisations debate one that integrates the cultural analysis with constructivist and post-globalisation approaches

References

  • Acharya, A. (2025). The Once And Future World Order: Why Global Civilization Will Survive The Decline Of The West. Basic Books. google scholar
  • Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined Communities: Reflections On The Origin And Spread Of Nationalism. Verso. google scholar
  • Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity At Large: Cultural Dimensions Of Globalization. University Of Minnesota Press. google scholar
  • Barber, B. R. (1995). Jihad vs. McWorld: Terrorism's challenge to democracy. Times Books. google scholar
  • Bull, H. (1977). The Anarchical Society: A Study Of Order In World Politics. Macmillan. google scholar
  • Dauda, S. (2017). Theory and Practice of Diplomacy. Tabith Publishers google scholar
  • Esposito, J. L. (1998). Islam and Politics (4th ed.). Syracuse University Press. google scholar
  • Fox, J. (2004). Religion and state failure: An examination of the extent and magnitude of religious conflict from 1950 to 1996. International Political Science Review, 25(1), 11-32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512104038167 google scholar
  • Fox, J. (2005). Paradigm lost: Huntington's unfulfilled clash of civilizations prediction into the 21st century. International Politics, 42(4), 428-446. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ip.8800118 google scholar
  • Halliday, F. (2002). Two Hours That Shook The World September 11, 2001: Causes And Consequences. Saqi Books. google scholar
  • Huntington, S. P. (1993). The clash of civilizations? Foreign Affairs, 72(3), 22-49. https://doi.org/10.2307/20045621 google scholar
  • Huntington, S. P. (1996). The Clash Of Civilizations And The Remaking Of World Order. Simon & Schuster. google scholar
  • Kaplan, R. D. (2000). The Coming Anarchy: Shattering The Dreams Of The Post Cold War. Random House. google scholar
  • Katzenstein, P. J. (Ed.). (1996). The culture of national security: Norms and identity in world politics. Columbia University Press. google scholar
  • Katzenstein, P. J. (Ed.). (2010). Civilizations In World Politics: Plural And Pluralist Perspectives. Routledge. google scholar
  • Lebow, R. N. (2024, January 11). Identity in international relations - Richard Ned Lebow | 2024 Ep. 1 [Audio podcast episode]. In IR Thinks.https://irthinker.com/identity-in-international-relations-richard-ned-lebow/ google scholar
  • Lewis, B. (2002). What Went Wrong? Western Impact And Middle Eastern Response. Oxford University Press. google scholar
  • Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft Power: The Means To Success In World Politics. PublicAffairs. google scholar
  • Ritzer, G. (2004). The McDonaldization of Society (Rev. new century ed.). Pine Forge Press. google scholar
  • Russett, B. M., Oneal, J. R., & Cox, M. (2000). Clash of civilizations, or realism and liberalism déjà vu? Some evidence. Journal of Peace google scholar
  • Research, 37(5), 583-608. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343300037005003 google scholar
  • Said, E. W. (2001). The Clash of Ignorance. The Nation, 273(12), 11-14. google scholar
  • Sen, A. (2006). Identity And Violence: The Illusion Of Destiny. W. W. Norton & Company. google scholar
  • Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of International Politics. Addison-Wesley. google scholar
  • Wendt, A. (1992). Anarchy is what states make of it: The social construction of power politics. International Organization, 46(2), 391-425. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027764 google scholar
  • Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research And Applications: Design And Methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications. google scholar
There are 26 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Historical Studies (Other)
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Idiongomfon Clement Okon 0009-0009-9050-3739

Submission Date January 1, 2025
Acceptance Date January 2, 2025
Publication Date January 6, 2026
DOI https://doi.org/10.26650/hupej.2025.2.2.5012026
IZ https://izlik.org/JA54FS68DD
Published in Issue Year 2025 Volume: 2 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Okon, I. C. (2026). A Contemporary Analysis on the Clash of Civilisation Debate. Journal of Humanity, Peace and Justice, 2(2), 112-120. https://doi.org/10.26650/hupej.2025.2.2.5012026