Evaluation and Classification of Behavioral Biases According to Thinking Styles, Risky Investment Intention, and Subjective Financial Literacy

Abstract

The main purpose of this study is to classify the 20 biases into different groups (factors) and estimate each of them according to the variables of rational, experiential-affective, risky investment intention, and financial literacy. Behavioral finance, which combines the concepts and approaches of psychology with the theory of finance, evaluates individuals’ deviations from rational choices in their financial decisions with the concept of biases. In this context, the data were collected from 1188 subjects in Turkey through online surveys using a convenience sampling method between 14 May - 28 June 2020. Participants were gender-balanced, young, single, and highly educated. An exploratory factor analysis, ANOVA, an independent sample T-test, and a correlation analysis were performed using SPSS. In addition, a confirmatory factor analysis was performed using structural equation modeling. According to the results, these 20 biases were grouped into four groups according to the variables of thinking style, risky investment intention, and subjective financial literacy level. It was determined how both these four groups and individual biases differ according to thinking styles, risky investment intention and their levels of subjective financial literacy. In addition, it was also investigated whether both bias groups and other variables differed according to four demographic variables.

Keywords

• Behavioral Biases
• Thinking Styles
• Risky Investment Intention
• Subjective Financial Literacy

References

1. Adamkovic, M., Martoncik, M., & Ropovik, I. (2020). The effect of economic situation on time and risk preferences: Does financial literacy matter?. Created: December 31, 2018 | Last edited: January 07, 2020. https://psyarxiv.com/5vaud 19.02.2021 google scholar
2. Al-Dahana N.S.H., Hasan M.F., & Jadah H.M. (2019). Effect of Cognitive and Emotional Biases on Investor Decisions: An Analytical Study of the Iraq Stock Exchange. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 9 (10), 30-47. google scholar
3. Anwar, M., Khan, S.Z., & Rehman, A.U. (2017). Financial Literacy, Behavioral Biases and Investor’s Portfolio Diversification: Empirical Study of an Emerging Stock Market. Journal of Finance & Economics Research, 2(2), 144-163. google scholar
4. Aren, S. (2019a). Evaluation of Psychological Biases in the Financial Framework. Journal of Social, Humanities and Administrative Sciences, 2(1), 1 - 25. google scholar
5. Aren, S. (2019b). Theoretical Evaluation Of Psychological Biases In Behavioral Finance. The Journal of Business Economics and Management Research, 2(2), 127-160. google scholar
6. Aren, S., & Canikli, S. (2018a). Typology of Behavioral Biases and Heuristics. 14TH International Strategic Management Conference July 12-14, 2018 Prague-Czechia, 557-562, The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences EpSBS Vol:54, 2019, pp. 290-296. google scholar
7. Aren, S., & Canikli, S. (2018b). The effect of financial literacy and risk perception on investment choices of individual investors. 8th International Conference On Leadership, Technology, Innovation And Business Management, July 12-14, Prague-Czechia, pp. 143-149. google scholar
8. Aren, S. & Hamamcı, H.N. (2020). Relationship between risk aversion, risky investment intention,investment choices: impact of personality traits and emotion. Kybernetes, 49(11), 2651-2682. DOI:10.1108/K-07-2019-0455. google scholar

9. Aren, S., Nayman, H.H., & Özcan, S. (2021). Moderation Effect of Pleasure Seeking and Loss Aversion in The Relationshıp Between Personality Traits and Risky Investment Intention. Kybernetes. Advance online publication. DOI: 10.1108/K-05-2020-0278 google scholar
10. Aren, S. & Hamamcı, H.N. (2021). Risk-taking and risk aversion in the period of before and after the 2008 crisis: evaluation with bibliometric analysis. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, Vol. ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print), 1-16. DOI: 10.1108/JEAS-03-2021-0047 google scholar
11. Ateş, S., Coşkun, A., Şahin, M.A., & Demircan, M.L. (2016). Impact of Financial Literacy on the Behavioral Biases of Individual Stock Investors: Evidence from Borsa Istanbul. Business and Economics Research Journal, 7(3), 1-19. google scholar
12. Avşar, Y., & Özdemir, O. (2020). A Research on the Effects of Textual Presentation Order in Annual Reports on Non-Professional Investors’ Decisions. Journal of Selçuk University Social Sciences Vocational School, 23(1), 257-286. google scholar
13. Ayadi, N., Paraschiv, C., & Vernette, E. (2017). Increasing Consumer Well-Being: Risk As Potential Driver of Happiness. Applied Economics, 49(43), 4321-4335. google scholar
14. Aydemir, S.D., & Aren, S. (2017). Do the effects of individual factors on financial risk-taking behavior diversify with financial literacy?. Kybernetes, 46(10), 1706-1734. google scholar
15. Baker, H.K., Kumar, S., Goyal, N., & Gaur, V. (2019). How financial literacy anddemographic variables relate tobehavioral biases. Managerial Finance, 45(1), 124-146. google scholar
16. Baker, H.K., & Ricciardi, V. (2014). How Biases Affect Investor Behaviour. The European Financial Review, February-March, 7-10. google scholar
17. Baker, K.H. (2019). The Psychology of Financial Professionals and Their Clients. Investment and Wealth Monitor, Sep/October, 15-20. google scholar
18. Barron, G., & Yechiam, E. (2009). The coexistence of overestimation and underweighting of rare events and the contingent recency effect. Judgment and Decision Making, 4(6), 447-460. google scholar
19. Baumeister, R.F. (2002). Yielding to temptation: Self-control failure, impulsive purchasing, and consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(4), 670-676. google scholar
20. Beasley, R. (2016). Dissonance and decision-making mistakes in the age of risk. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(5), 771-787. google scholar
21. Blumenthal-Barby, J. S. (2016). Biases and Heuristics in Decision Making and Their Impact on Autonomy. The American Journal of Bioethics, 16(5), 5-15. google scholar
22. Bommier, A., & Rochet, J. C. (2006). Risk aversion and planning horizons. Journal of the European Economic Association, 4(4), 708-734 google scholar
23. Borghans, L., Golsteyn, B.H.H., Heckman, J.J., & Meijers, H. (2009). Gender Differences in Risk Aversion and Ambiguity Aversion, Journal of the European Economic Association. MIT Press, 7(2-3), 649-658. google scholar
24. Boyle, P. A., Yu, L., Buchman, A. S., & Bennett, D. A. (2012). Risk aversion is associated with decision making among community-based older persons. Frontiers in psychology, 3. google scholar
25. Breuer, W., Riesener, M. & Salzmann, A.J. (2014). Risk aversion vs. individualism: what drives risktaking in household finance?. The European Journal of Finance, 20(5), 446-462. DOI:10.1080/135184 7X.2012.714792. google scholar
26. Broihanne, M.H., Merli, M., & Roger, P. (2014). Overconfidence, Risk Perception and The Risk-Taking Behavior of Finance Professionals. Finance Research Letters, 11(2), 64-73. google scholar
27. Brooks, C., Sangiorgi, I., Hillenbrand, C. & Money, K. (2018). Why older investors less willing to take financial risks?. International Review of Financial Analysis, 56(2018), 52-72. google scholar
28. Bucciol, A., & Miniaci, R. (2011). Household portfolios and implicit risk preference. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 93(4), 1235-1250. google scholar
29. Byder, J., Agudela, D.A. & Arango, I. (2019). Gender matters most. The impact on short-term riskaversion following a financial crash. Review of Financial Economics, 37, 106-117. google scholar
30. Byrne, B. M. (2011). Structural equation modeling with AMOS Basic concepts, applications, and programming (Multivariate Applications Series), New York: Routledge. google scholar
31. Ceschia, A., Costantinia, A., Sartoria, R., Weller, J., & Di Fabio, A. (2019). Dimensions of decision-making: An evidence-based classification of heuristics and biases. Personality and Individual Differences, 146, 188-200. google scholar
32. Charness, G., Gneezy, U. & Imas, A. (2013). Experimental methods: eliciting risk preferences. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 87, 43-51 google scholar
33. Charness, G., & Dave, C. (2017). Confirmation Bias with Motivated Beliefs. Games and Economic Behavior, 104, 1-23. google scholar
34. Chen, C.S., Cheng, J.C., Lin, F.C., & Chihwei, P. (2017). The Role of House Money Effect and Availability Heuristic in Investor Behavior. Management Decision, 55(8), 1598-1612. google scholar
35. Chira, I., Adams, M., & Thornton, B. (2008). Behavioral Bias Within The Decision Making Process. Journal of Business & Economics Research, 6(8), 11-20. google scholar
36. Cipriano, M., & Gruca, T.S. (2014). The Power of Priors: How Confirmation Bias Impacts Market Prices. The Journal ofPrediction Markets, 8(3), 34-56. google scholar
37. Cole, S., Sampson, T. & Zia, B. (2008). Money or knowledge? What drives the demand for financial services in developing countries (Vol. 9, (117) 09-117). Harvard Business School Working Paper. google scholar
38. Costa, D.F, Carvalho, F., Bruno, C.M., & Prado, J.W. (2017). Bibliometric Analysis on the Association Between Behavioral Finance and Decision Making With Cognitive Biases Such As Overconfidence, Anchoring Effect and Confirmation Bias. Scientometrics, 111(3), 1775-1799. google scholar
39. Cristina, B. (2009). The influence of saving process to reduction the effects of international financial crisis. Metalurgia International, 14, 143-149. google scholar
40. Czaja, D., & Röder, F. (2020). Self-Attribution Bias and Overconfidence among Nonprofessional Traders. The Quarterly Review ofEconomics and Finance, 78(November), 186-198. google scholar
41. Czerwonka, M. (2019). Cultural, cognitive and personality traits in risk taking behavior: evidencefrom Poland and the United States of America. Economic Research- Ekonomska Istrazivanja, 32(1), 894-908. DO I:10.1080/1331677X.2019.1588766. google scholar
42. De Bondt, W., Muradoglu, G., Shefrin, H., & Staikouras, S.K. (2009). Behavioral finance. Quo vadis?. Journal ofApplied Finance, 18(2), 7-21. google scholar
43. Dickason, Z., & Ferreira, S. (2018). Establishing a link between risktolerance, investor personality and behavioural finance in South Africa. Cogent Economics &Finance, 6(1), 1-13. google scholar
44. Dimmock, S.G. & Kouwenberg, R. (2010). Loss-aversion and household portfolio choice. Journal ofEmpi-rical Finance, 33(3), 441-459 google scholar
45. Dimmock, S. G., Kouwenberg, R., Mitchell, O. S., & Peijnenburg, K. (2016). Ambiguity aversion and household portfolio choice puzzles: Empirical evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 119(3), 559-577. google scholar
46. Foltice, B., & Rogers, R. (2020). Ambiguity aversion and experiential learning: implications for long-term savings decisions. Review ofBehavioral Finance. Advance online publication. google scholar
47. Goetzmann, W.N., & Massa, M. (2008). Disposition Matters: Volume, Volatility, and Price Impact of a Behavioral Bias. The Journal ofPortfolio Management, 34(2), 103-125. google scholar
48. Gollier, C. (2002). What does classical theory have to say about household portfolios?. Household Portfolios, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 27-54. ISBN 978-0-262-07221-2 google scholar
49. Guiso, L., Sapienza, P. & Zingales, L. (2018). Time varying risk aversion. Journal ofFinancial Economics, 128(3), 403-421. google scholar
50. Hala, Y., Abdullah, M.W., Andayani, W., Ilyas, G.B., & Akob, M. (2020). The Financial Behavior of Investment Decision Making Between Real and Financial Assets Sectors. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 7(12), 635-645. google scholar
51. Halko, M.-L., Kaustia, M., & Alanko, E. (2012). The gender effect in risky asset holdings. Journal ofEcono-mic Behavior and Organization, 83(2012), 66-81. google scholar
52. Hooks, T., Schuitema, G., & McDermott, F. (2019). Risk Perceptions Toward Drinking Water Quality Among Private Well Owners in Ireland: The Illusion of Control. Risk Analysis, 39(8), 1741-1754. google scholar
53. Huangfu, G. (2014). Individual Differences in Risk-Taking Tendency and Framing Effect. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 42(2), 279-284. google scholar
54. Humphrey, S.J. (2004). Feedback-Conditional Regret Theory and Testing Regret-Aversion in Risky Choice. Journal of Economic Psychology, 25(6), 839-857. google scholar
55. Jain, N., & Kesari, B. (2019). Effect of Conservatism Bias and Self-Attrıbutıon Bias on Financial Risk Tolerance of Investors, Gap Gyan, 2(1), 83-87. google scholar
56. Javed, H., Bagh, T., & Razzaq, S. (2017). Herding Effects, Over Confidence, Availability Bias and Representativeness as Behavioral Determinants of Perceived Investment Performance: An Empirical Evidence from Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX). Journal of Global Economics, 5(4), 1-13. google scholar
57. Jetter, M., & Walker, J.K. (2017). Anchoring in Financial Decision-Making: Evidence From Jeopardy!. Journal ofEconomic Behavior & Organization, 141(Sep.), 164-176. google scholar
58. Josef, N., & Vera, J. (2017). Financial Literacy and Behavioral Skills: The Influence of Financial Literacy Level on Behavioural Skills. KnE Social Sciences, 1(2), 366-373. google scholar
59. Kahneman, D. (2013). Hızlı ve Yavaş Düşünmek [Thinking, Fast and Slow] (O.Ç. Deniztekin, & F.N. Deniz-tekin, Trans.). İstanbul, Turkey: Varlık Yayınları. google scholar
60. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1972). Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology. 3(3), 430-454. google scholar
61. Kes, D., Şahin, F. & Sevencan, N.Ö. (2021). Sağlıklı Yaşam Tarzına Ulaşma Eğilimi Ölçeği’nin Türkçeye Uyarlaması ve Psikometrik Ölçümlerinin Değerlendirilmesi. Turk Journal of Cardiovasc Nurse, 12(28), 88-93. google scholar
62. Kılınç, N., & Kılıç, Y. (2018). The Relationshıp Between Financial Literacy and Behavioral Finance: A Study For Investment Professionals. 22. Finance Symposium 10 -13 October 2018, Mersin Turkey, pp. 479-489. google scholar
63. Kliger, D., & Kudryavtsev, A. (2010). The Availability Heuristic and Investors’ Reaction to Company-Specific Events. Journal ofBehavioral Finance, 11(1), 50-65. google scholar
64. Kudryavtsev, A. (2018). The Availability Heuristic and Reversals Following Large Stock Price Changes. Journal ofBehavioral Finance, 19(2), 159-176. google scholar
65. Lam, D., & Ozorio, B. (2015). An Exploratory Study of the Relationship Between Digit Ratio, Illusion of Control, and Risk-Taking Behavior Among Chinese College Students. Journal of Gambling Studies, 31(4), 1377-1385. google scholar
66. Lambert, J., Bessiere, V., & N’Goala, G. (2012). Does Expertise Influence The Impact of Overconfidence on Judgment, Valuation And Investment Decision?. Journal ofEconomic Psychology, 33(6), 1115-1128. google scholar
67. List, J. A. (2003). Does Market Experience Eliminate Market Anomalies?. Quarterly Journal ofEconomics, 118, 41-71. google scholar
68. Loewenstein, G., Weber, E.U., Hsee, C.K., & Welch, N. (2001). Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin, 127(2), 267-286 google scholar
69. Luo, G. Y. (2013). Conservatism bias in the presence of strategic interaction. Quantitative Finance, 13(7), 989-996. google scholar
70. Maggi, M.A. (2006). Loss aversion and perceptual risk aversion. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 50(4), 426-430. google scholar
71. Maner, J.K., Gailliot, M.T., Butz, D.A., & Peruche, B.M. (2007). Power, risk, and the status quo: Does power promote riskier or more conservative decision making?. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(4), 451-462. google scholar
72. Mannberg, A. (2012). Risk and rationalization—The role of affect and cognitive dissonance for sexual risk taking. European Economic Review, 56(6), 1325-1337. google scholar
73. Martinez, F., Le Floch, V., Gaffie, B., & Villejoubert, G. (2011). Reports of Wins and Risk Taking: An Investigation of the Mediating Effect of the Illusion of Control. Journal of Gambling Studies, 27(2), 271-285. google scholar
74. Meertens, R.M., & Lion, R. (2011). The effects of risk-taking tendency on risk choice and pre- and post-decisional information selection. Journal of Risk Research, 14(6), 647-656. google scholar
75. Mehmood, F., Bashir, T., & Khan, A. (2019). Financial Literacy as a Life-Saver: Moderating the Contribution of Behavioral Biases towards Investment Decisions, Global Social Sciences Review (GSSR), 4(3), 106-114. google scholar
76. Menkhoff, L., Schmeling, M., & Schmidt, U. (2013). Overconfidence, Experience, and Professionalism: An Experimental Study. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 86, 92-101. google scholar
77. Merkle, C. (2017). Financial overconfidence over time: Foresight, hindsight, and insight of investors. Journal of Banking & Finance, 84, 68-87. google scholar
78. Meziani, A.S. and Noma, E. (2018). A New Method of Measuring Financial Risk Aversion Using Hypothetical Investment Preferences: What Does It Say in the Case of Gender Differences?. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 19(4), 450-461. google scholar
79. Mishra, S., Gregson, M., & Lalumiére, M. L. (2011). Framing effects and risk-sensitive decision making. British Journal of Psychology, 103(1), 83-97. google scholar
80. Mota, J.H., Moreira, A.C., & Cossa, A.J.(2015). Behavioural Factors in The Financial Decisions of Young Mozambicans. South African Journal of Business Management, 46(4), 11-22. google scholar
81. Mouna, A., & Jarboui, A. (2015). Financial literacy and portfolio diversification: an observation from the Tunisian stock market. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 33(6), 808-822. google scholar
82. Mrkva, K., Johnson, E.J., Gaechter, S., & Herrmann, A. (2020). Moderating Loss Aversion: Loss Aversion Has Moderators, But Reports of its Death are Greatly Exaggerated, Journal of Consumer Psychology, 30(3), 407-428. google scholar
83. Muehlbacher, S., & Kirchler, E. (2019). Individual Differences in Mental Accounting. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1-15. google scholar
84. Nelson, J.A. (2014). The Power of Stereotyping and Confirmation Bias To Overwhelm Accurate Assessment: The Case of Economics, Gender, and Risk Aversion. Journal of Economic Methodology, 21(3), 211-232. google scholar Nickerson, R.S. (1998). Confirmation Bias: An Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175-220. google scholar
85. Peon, D., Antelo, M., & Calvo-Silvosa, A. (2017). An inclusive taxonomy of behavioral biases. European Journal of Government and Economics, 6(1), 24-58. google scholar
86. Plonsky, O., & Erev, I. (2016). Learning in settings with partial feedback and the wavy recency effect of rare events. Cognitive Psychology, 93, 18-43. google scholar
87. Pompian, M.M. (2008). Using Behavioral Investor Types to Build Better Relationships with Your Clients. Journal of Financial Planning. October, 64 - 76. google scholar
88. Pompian, M.M. (2012). Behavioral Finance and Investor Types Managing Behavior to Make Better Investment Decisions, Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey. google scholar
89. Pompian, M.M. (2006). Behavioral finance and wealth management: how to build investment strategies that account for investor biases, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey. google scholar
90. Pretz, J.E., & Totz, K.S. (2007). Measuring individual differences in affective, heuristic, and holistic intuition. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1247-1257. google scholar
91. Rahim, A., Shah, M.H., & Aamir, A. (2019). Impact of Conservatism Bias Effect On Investment. City University Research Journal, 9(1), 85-97. google scholar
92. Ramiah, V., Xu, X., & Moosa, I.A. (2015). Neoclassical finance, behavioral finance and noise traders: A review and assessment of the literature. International Review of Financial Analysis, 41, 89-100. google scholar
93. Rasool, N., & Ullah, S. (2020). Financial literacy and behavioural biases of individual investors: empirical evidence of Pakistan stock exchange. Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science, 25(50), 261-278. google scholar
94. Reb, J. (2008). Regret Aversion and Decision Process Quality: Effects of Regret Salience on Decision Process Carefulness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 105(2), 169-182. google scholar Ritika, N.K. (2020). Risk preferences for financial decisions: Do emotional biases matter?. Journal of Public Affairs. Advance online publication. google scholar
95. Sahi, S.K., Arora, A.P., & Dhameja, N. (2013). An Exploratory Inquiry into the Psychological Biases in Financial Investment Behavior. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 14, 94-103. google scholar
96. Sakha, S. (2019). Determinants of risk aversion over time: experimental evidence from ruralThailand. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 80(2019), 184-198. google scholar
97. Salman, M., Khan, B., & Javed, A. (2020). Moderated Mediation: The Impact of Heuristic Representativeness Bias on Investment Decision-Making. Academic Journal of Social Sciences, 4(2), 354-363. google scholar
98. Samuelson, W., & Zeckhauser, R. (1988). Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1(1), 7-59. google scholar
99. Shams, M.A. (2002). The Availability Heuristic in Judgments of Research Findings: Manipulations of Subjective Experience. The Osprey Journal of Ideas and Inquiry, All Volumes (2001-2008), 114-127. google scholar
100. Shefrin, H. (2008). A Behavioral Approach to Asset Pricing (Academic Press Advanced Finance), (2nd Edition), Academic Press Elsevier, USA. google scholar
101. Shefrin, H.M., & Thaler, R.H. (1988). The Behavioral Life-Cycle Hypothesis. Economic Inquiry, 26(4), 609-643. google scholar
102. Simon, H. (1972). Theories of Bounded Rationality. In: C. B. McGuire, & R. Radner (Eds.), Decision and Organization, Amsterdam: North-Holland. (pp. 161-176). google scholar
103. Smith, I., & Giroux, I. (2019). The Illusion of Control in Gambling among University Students: The Benefit of the Doubt?. Journal of Gambling Issues, 42, 107-129. google scholar
104. Smith, A.R., Windschitl, P.D., & Bruchmann, K. (2013). Knowledge Matters: Anchoring Effects Are Moderated By Knowledge Level. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43(1), 97-108. google scholar
105. Thaler R.H. & Sunstein C.R. (2008). Nudge. New Haven London: Yale University Press (Çev. Enver Günsel, 2013, İstanbul: Pegasus Yayınları). google scholar
106. Teovanovic, P., Knezevic, G., & Stankov, L. (2015). Individual differences in cognitive biases: Evidence against one-factor theory of rationality. Intelligence, 50, 75-86. google scholar
107. Trehan, B., & Sinha, A.K. (2020). The Effect of Behavioral Biases on Retirement Planning. Test Engineering and Management, 82, 5367-5377. google scholar
108. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A Heuristic for Judging Frequency and Probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5(2), 207-232. google scholar
109. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124-1131. google scholar
110. Van de Ven, N., & Zeelenberg, M. (2011). Regret Aversion and the Reluctance to Exchange Lottery Tickets. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32(1), 194-200. google scholar
111. Waltz, C.F., Strcikland, O.L. & Lenz, E.R. (2010). Measurement in Nursing and Health Research. New York: Springer Publishing Company. google scholar
112. Wang, J., Sheng, J., & Yang, J. (2013). Optimism bias and incentive contracts in portfolio delegation. Economic Modelling, 33, 493-499. google scholar
113. Wong, K.P. (2014). Fixed Versus Variable Rate Loans Under Regret Aversion. Economic Modelling, 42, 140-145. google scholar
114. Yaşlıoğlu, M.M. (2017). Sosyal Bilimlerde Faktör Analizi ve Geçerlilik: Keşfedici ve Doğrulayıcı Faktör Analizlerinin Kullanılması. Istanbul University Journal of the School of Business, 46(Özel Sayı), 74-85. google scholar
115. Zeelenberg, M., & Beattie, J. (1997). Consequences of Regret Aversion 2: Additional Evidence for Effects of Feedback on Decision Making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 72(1), 63-78. google scholar
116. Zeelenberg, M., Beattie, J., Pligt, V.J., & Vries, N.K. (1996). Consequences of Regret Aversion: Effects of Expected Feedback on Risky Decision Making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65(2), 148-158. google scholar
117. Pacini, R., & Epstein, S. (1999). The relation of rational and experiential information processing styles to personality, basic beliefs, and the ratio-bias phenomenon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(6), 972-987. google scholar