Thinking Styles of New Mathematics Teachers and Their Relation to Self-Esteem

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 8, 157 - 166, 05.10.2020

Yousef Abd Algani , Amer Haj

https://doi.org/10.31458/iejes.707401

Cited By: 3

Öz

The teacher’s self-esteem affects his point of view, his thinking style, and his attitudes towards education. It also generally influences the teacher’s behavior during the lesson session, his relationship with students, his teaching style, and also his expectations of the students as well as the decisions that he makes in his teaching plans. It can also have a significant impact on his students in developing their thinking style, and in helping students to overcome their educational difficulties and their fear of the subject they are studying. This research aims to determine the contribution of self-esteem in forecasting thinking styles among new mathematics teachers. The significance of this study is to determine the contribution of self-esteem in forecasting thinking styles in order to draw the attention of educators and researchers when preparing teacher training programs including their syllabus and the teaching material, because it will affect their performance and their students in the future. The researcher used the quantitative method and Thinking Styles Inventory to check the contribution of self-esteem in forecasting the thinking styles of the new mathematics teachers. The researcher will also use the Self-esteem scale to check the contribution of self-esteem in forecasting the thinking styles of the new mathematics teachers. The study sample consisted of 169 participants (79 males, 90 female): new mathematics teachers in Israel. The results show that the correlation coefficients between the legislative thinking style and self-esteem were significant (1.4%). and show that the correlation coefficients between the executive thinking style and self-esteem was significant at (2.8%).

Anahtar Kelimeler

Mathematics, New Teachers, Self-Esteem, Thinking Style

Kaynakça

• Algani, Y. (2018). Applying creative skills in teaching math at the primary school stage. Journal of International Economy and Business, 6, 26-33.
• Algani, Y., M., & Eshan, J. (2019a). Reasons and suggested solutions for low-level academic achievement in mathematics. International e-Journal of Educational Studies (IEJES), 6 (3), 142-151. DOI: 10.31458/iejes.571751.
• Algani, Y. (2019b). Innovative ways to teach mathematics: Are they employed in schools? Journal of Computer and Education Research (JCER), 7(14), 496-514. DOI: 10.18009/jcer.612199.
• Barry, C., Grafeman, S., Adler, K. & Pickard, J. (2007). The relations among narcissism, self-esteem and delinquency in a sample of at- risk adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 30(6), 933- 942.
• Bolkamedy, A. (2012). Methods of thinking and their relationship to self-esteem in on secondary school students. The Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 12(1), 209-229.
• Brand, S., Felner, R., Seitsinger, A., Burns, A.& Bolton, N. (2008). A large scale study of the assessment of the social environment of middle and secondary schools: The validity and utility of teachers' ratings of school climate, cultural pluralism, and safety problems for understanding school effects and school improvement. Journal of School Psychology, 13(9), 239-253.
• Ciarrochi, J., Heaven, P., & Davies, F. (2007). The impact of hope, self-esteem, and attributional style on adolescents’ school grades and emotional well- being: A longitudinal study. Journal of Research in Personality , 41(16), 1161-1174.
• Grigorenko, E., & Sternberg, R. (1995). Thinking styles in school settings. European Journal of High Ability, 9(1), 201- 219.
• Khun, H. (2017). The effect of students’ confidence level toward mathematics performance among southern Thailand primary school children. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 6(2), 132-141.
• Keşan, C., & Kaya, D. (2018). Mathematics and science self-efficacy resources as the predictor of academic success. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 10(2), 45-58.
• Lawrence, D. (1996). Enhancing self-esteem in the classroom, (2nd Ed), London: poulchapman publishing.
• Sellah, L., Jacinta, K., & Helen, M. (2018). Predictive power of cognitive styles on academic performance of students in selected national secondary schools in Kenya. Cogent Psychology Journal, 6(2), 91-101.
• Martinez-Romera, D.D., Sternberg, W. (2018). Thinking styles: A research tool in social science didactics. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 8 (4), 398-407.
• Pryor, J. (1994). Self- esteem and attitudes toward gender roles: Contributing factors in adolescence. Australian Journal of Psychology, 46 (1), 48 – 52.
• Sternberg, R. (1988). Mental self-government: A theory of intellectual styles and their development. Human of Development, 16(3), 197- 224.
• Sternberg, R. (1997). Functions of thinking styles: The legislative, executive, and judicial styles. in thinking styles, Cambridge University Press, 27-43.
• Sternberg, R.J. & Grigorenko, E.L. (1997). Are cognitive styles still in style? American Psychologist, 52(7), 700- 712.
• Twashemly, R. (2008). Mathematics students' thinking styles and their relationship to some variables, The Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 11(3), 514-523.
• Weber, S., Puskar, K., & Ren, D. (2010). Relationships between depressive symptoms and perceived social support, self-esteem, & optimism in a sample of rural adolescents. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 31, 584–588.
• Zhang, L. F. (2001). Thinking styles, self-esteem, and extracurricular experiences. International Journal of Psychology, 36 (2),100-107.
• Zhang, L. F. (2002a). The role of thinking styles in psychosocial development. Journal of College Student Development, 43(5), 696-711.
• Zhang, L. F. (2002b). Thinking styles: Their relationships with modes of thinking and academic performance. Educational Psychology, 22 (3), 331-348.
• Zhang, L. (2006). Thinking styles and the big five personality traits revisited. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(6), 1177- 1187.