Picture Your Science Educators: Through the Eyes of the Student Teachers

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 18, 292 - 305, 27.10.2024

Medine Baran , Mukadder Baran

https://doi.org/10.31458/iejes.1508910

Öz

This study was aimed to examine and compare the opinions of science teachers studying at undergraduate and master levels in Norway and Turkey towards their instructors. 22 students studying in science fields at a state university in Norway and 28 students studying in science fields at a state university in Turkey participated in the research. The students participating in the research were selected on the basis of a easily accessible sample. Research data was collected using a structured interview form consisting of 5 open-ended questions that questioned students' opinions about the instructors. The data obtained at the end of the research was analyzed using content analysis and descriptive analysis methods. Considering the findings, the themes of student opinions were obtained: 21st century skills of the science instructors, methods and techniques they use in the classroom, the effects of the science instructors on themselves, what I would do if I were a science educator, and role modeling. While some of the participating students in Turkey found the lecturers inadequate in terms of 21st Century skills, most of the students in Norway found the lecturers sufficient. While student teachers in Turkey emphasized that science instructors ' interaction and communication with students and a strong academic infrastructure are important, participants in Norway pointed out that science instructors have positive effects that contribute to being a good teacher. However, participating students in both groups stated that more traditional teaching methods were used in the classroom. It was determined that students had negative opinions as well as positive opinions. The two most important components of the university learning environment that are meaningful to each other are students and science instructors. Therefore, it is thought that more qualified teaching activities will be realized if science instructors care about what students think about them

Anahtar Kelimeler

Science educators, perceptions, student teachers

Kaynakça

• Alan, A. (2019). The examination of the opinions of the faculty of education undergraduate students towards the faculty, Akdeniz Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Antalya.
• Akkoyunlu, B., & Kurbanoğlu, S. (2002). Effectiveness of information literacy program applied to initial teacher training students and relation between information literacy skills and perceived computer self efficacy. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 22(1), 98-105.
• Bakioğlu, A., & Yıldız, A. (2015). The Finnish education system and teacher training in the context of PISA. Vize Basın Yayın.
• Baran, G., Taşlıbeyaz, E.,& Kayalar, M.T. (2023). Determination of technology and distance learning needs of academici- ans according to the technology self-efficiency. Journal of University Research, 6(3), 279-291
• Boyatzis, R. E., & Kolb, D. A. (1991). Assessing individuality in learning: The learning skills profile. Educational Psychology,11(3-4), 279-295. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341910110305
• Başıbüyük, B. (2015). An investigation of academıcians technological pedagogical content knowledge self efficacy in terms of different variables. Sakarya Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Sakarya.
• Bullough, RV. (2005). Being and becoming a mentor: school-based teacher educators and teacher educator identity, Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(2), 143-155.
• Conley, D. T. (2007). Redefining college readiness. Educational Policy Improvement Center. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED539251
• Damsa, C. (2019). Learning with digital technologies in higher education. J. Educ. Sci. Psychol. 9, 5-9. Available online: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=136487340&lang=pt-pt&site=eds-live&scope=site (accessed on 11 May 2021).
• Fauth, B., Decristan, J., Decker, A. T., Buettner, G., Hardy, I., Klieme, E., & Kunter, M. (2019). The effects of teacher competence on student outcomes in elementary science education: The mediating role of teaching quality. Teaching and Teacher Education, 86, Article 102882.
• Finne, H., Mordal S., & Stene, TM. (2014). Oppfatninger av studiekvalitet i lærerutdanningene 2013. SINTEF-rapport, Trondheim
• Gilmore, J., & Feldon, D. (2010). Measuring graduate students’ teaching and research skills through self-report: Descriptive findings and validity evidence. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Denver, CO. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED509407.pdf
• Gündüzalp, S., & Demirtaş Z. (2020). Instructors from the perspectives of faculty of education. Journal of Higher Education and Science, 10(2), 224-233.
• Göçen Kabaran, G., & Uşun, S. (2017). Metaphors of education faculty students on perceptions of faculty and instructors. Eğitim Kuram ve Uygulama Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3 (2), 35-49
• Güneş, M. H., & Karaşah, Ş. (2016). Geçmişten günümüze fen eğitiminin önemi ve fen eğitiminde son yıllarda yapılan çalışmalar. Eğitim ve Öğretim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(3), 122-136.
• Işık, A. Çiltaş, A.& Baş, F. (2010). Teacher training and teaching profession. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 14 (1), 53-62
• İlter, İ. (2014). Teacher candidates’ opinions related to methods and techniques used by the instructors. Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 7(35), 562- 576.
• Karip, E. (2002). Sınıf yönetimi (1. Baskı). Pegem Yayıncılık.
• Katane, I. e. (2006). Teacher competence and further education as priorities for sustainable development of rural school in Latvia. Journal of Teacher Education and Training.
• Kelly, M. G., & McAnear, A. (2002). National educational technology standards for teachers: preparing teachers to use technology (First Edition). International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED473131.pdf
• Kleickmann, T., Tröbst, S., Jonen, A., Vehmeyer, J., & Möller, K. (2016). The effects of expert scaffolding in elementary science professional development on teachers’ beliefs and motivations, instructional practices, and student achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(1), 21-42. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000041
• Kunter, M., Klusmann, U., Baumert, J., Richter, D., Voss, T., & Hachfeld, A. (2013). Professional competence of teacher: Effects on instructional quality and student development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 805–820
• Lamatokan, A. (2018). Students’ perception toward teachers’ teaching styles and the use of learning strategies in teaching english. Eralingua: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Asing dan Sastra, 2,(2)
• Lid, S E. (2013). PPUs relevans for undervisning i skolen. En kartlegging av studenters og nyutdannede læreres oppfatninger. NOKUT-rapport 2013-2
• Mah, D.-K., & Ifenthaler, D. (2017). Academic staff perspectives on first-year students’ academic competencies. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 9(4), 630-640.
• Mah, D.-K., & Ifenthaler, D. (2018). Students’ perceptions toward academic competencies: The case of German first-year students. Issues in Educational Research, 28(1), 120-137.
• Miles, M, B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded Sourcebook. (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, Sage.
• Murat, M., Aslantaş, H. İ., & Özgan, H. (2006). Assessment of instructors with regard to instructional activities in classrooms. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 26 (3), 263-278
• Murray, H., (2005). Student evaluation of teaching: has it made a difference? Retrieved from https://www.stlhe.ca/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Student-Evaluation-of-Teaching1.pdf
• Peterson, M., Bitzer, EM., & Van Schalkwyk, SC. (2020). How academics view and use student feedback: An activity theory perspective. Journal of New Generation Science, 18 (1)
• Punch, K. F. (2005). Sosyal araştirmalara giriş: Nitel ve nicel yaklaşımlar (Çevirenler: D. Bayrak, B. Aslan ve Z. Akyüz). Siyasal Kitabevi.
• Pelayo, JMG., Mallari, SDC., & Mungcal, IGM. (2017). Student perception towards educators, the school and self-image as learners. Assessment, Counseling, Alumni and Placement Center (ACAP). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED579279.pdf
• Read, W., Rama, D., & Raghunandan (2010). The relationship between student evaluations of teaching and faculty evaluations. Journal of Education For Business, 76(4),189-192
• Rodrigues, A.L., Cerdeira, L., Machado-Taylor, M.d.L., & Alves, H. (2021). Technological skills in higher education-different needs and different uses. Educ. Sci. 11, 326.
• Ruys, I., Defruyt, S., Rots, I., & Aelterman, A. (2013). Differentiated instruction in teacher education: A case study of congruent teaching. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 19(1), 93-107.
• Shevlin, M., Banyard, P., Davies, M., & Griffiths, M., (2010). The validity of student evaluation of teaching in higher education: love me, love my lectures. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 25(4),397-405 https://doi.org/10.1080/713611436
• Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories: An educational perspective (6th ed.). Pearson.
• Ulvik, M., & Smith, K. (2019). Teaching about teaching: Teacher educators' and student teachers' perspectives from Norway. International Research, Policy and Practice in Teacher Education. Academic chapter/article
• Tortop, H. S. (2013). Preservice teachers’ metaphors about university teacher and metaphor as an evaluation tool. Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi, 3(2), 153-160.
• Tsou, C. (2020). Student evaluation of teaching (SET): a critical review of the literature. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339130475_Student_Evaluation_of_Teaching_SET_A_Critical_Review_of_the_Literature Access date: 02.07.2024
• Van der Meer, J., Jansen, E., & Torenbeek, M. (2010). 'It's almost a mindset that teachers need to change': First-year students' need to be inducted into time management. Studies in Higher Education, 35(7), 777-791. http://doi.org/10.1080/03075070903383211
• Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2013). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştirma yöntemleri. Seçkin Yayınevi. Yılar, M. B., Karadağ, Y., & Aydoğmuş, M. (2021). Communication skills of faculty of education instructors: an evaluation study from the perspective of teacher candidates. Manas Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 10(4), 2160-2175
• YÖK (2007). Öğretmen yetiştirme ve eğitim fakülteleri (1982-2007) öğretmenin üniversitede yetiştirilmesinin değerlendirilmesi. (http://www.yok.gov.tr/)
• Zhao, J., & Gallant, D., (2011). Student evaluation of instruction in higher education: exploring issues of validity and reliability. Retrieved from https://srhe.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02602938.2010.523819#.XhpS3chKiUk
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 82-91. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1016