An Inquiry on the Legal Status and Protection of Climate Refugees from an International Law Perspective

Abstract

Climate crisis-related displacement is one of the most prominent issues in our world. Although, there is no given legal definition for climate refugees in any international legal convention, in order to analyse this phenomenon; those who are compelled to leave their homes due to climate change-related catastrophes would be accepted as climate refugees within this article. It is clear that climate refugees, who sit at the crossroads of climate change and the refugee crises, can only be adequately protected through a combination of climate action and refugee rights. The climate crisis is a substructure of the refugee crisis. Therefore, climate action, which is principally aimed at solving substructural problems, is essential for solving the superstructural climate refugee crisis. Nevertheless, according to scientific predictions, even the most optimistic scenarios foresee a considerable change in the climate. Hence, even the most optimistic scenarios in which humanity takes climate action may not be enough to prevent the existence of climate refugees. The Refugee Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, which is currently the most prominent international convention on refugee rights, does not encompass climate refugees because of its contingent wording. Thus, it is necessary to adopt comprehensive legislation that protects the rights of climate refugees in addition to climate action that would reduce the number of possible refugees. Yet both substructural and superstructural issues are in a position of conundrum due to the extant international political and legal system, which prioritises the national sovereignty and states consents. Consequently, legal solutions in the sense of both climate and refugee crises fall short if the international political and legal status quo is ignored.

Keywords

• Climate Refugees
• Climate Crisis
• Refugee Crisis
• Refugee Convention
• National Sovereignty
• Complementary Protection

Uluslararası Hukuk Bakış Açısından İklim Mültecilerinin Hukuki Konumu ve Korunmasına İlişkin Bir İnceleme

Abstract

İklim krizi neticesinde yerinden edilme olgusu günümüz dünyasının en temel sorunlarından biridir. Ancak, iklim mültecisi ifadesi herhangi bir uluslararası hukuk sözleşmesinde tanımlanmamaktadır. Dolayısıyla bu olgunun incelenebilmesi amacıyla bu çalışmada, “yurtlarını iklim değişikliğine bağlı felaketler sebebiyle terk etmek zorunda kalan kimseler” iklim mültecisi olarak kabul edilecektir. Bu nedenle, iklim krizi ve mülteci krizinin kesişme noktasında bulunan iklim mültecilerinin, iklim eylemi ve mülteci haklarının bir kombinasyonu ile yeterli ölçüde korunabileceği açıktır. Böylelikle iklim mültecileri bağlamında iklim krizi, mülteci krizinin alt yapısı konumundadır. Dolayısıyla temelde altyapı sorununu çözmeyi hedefleyen iklim eylemi, üstyapısal konumdaki iklim mülteciliği sorununu çözmek için elzemdir. Bununla birlikte, bilimsel tahminlere göre en iyimser senaryolarda da iklimde önemli bir değişiklik meydana geleceği öngörülmektedir. Dolayısıyla, insanlığın iklim eylemini başarıyla yürüttüğü en iyimser senaryolar dahi iklim mültecilerinin var olmalarının önüne geçilemeyebilir. Günümüzde, mülteci hakları bağlamında en önemli uluslararası düzenleme olan 1951 tarihli Cenevre Mülteci Sözleşmesi ise lafzî kısıtlılığı sebebiyle iklim mültecilerini kapsamamaktadır. Bu nedenle, olası mülteci sayısını azaltacak bir iklim eyleminin desteklenmesiyle birlikte iklim mültecilerinin haklarını koruyacak kapsamlı bir mülteci mevzuatının oluşturulması gerekmektedir. Trajik bir biçimde, ulusal egemenlikleri ve devletlerin rızalarını ön planda tutan mevcut uluslararası siyasi ve hukuki sistem nedeniyle hem altyapı hem de üstyapı sorunları bir kördüğüm konumundadır. Sonuç olarak, uluslararası siyasi ve hukuki statükonun göz ardı edilmesi halinde hem iklim krizi hem de mülteci krizi anlamında önerilecek hukuki çözümler yetersiz kalacaktır.

Keywords

• İklim Mültecileri
• İklim Krizi
• Mülteci Krizi
• Mülteci Sözleşmesi
• Ulusal Egemenlik
• İkincil Koruma

References

1. “New Revised Standard Version Bible”, (Bible Gateway) Date of access 30 Septeber 2021 google scholar
2. “The Quran”, Mufti Taqi Usmani (trans) (Quran.com) Date of access 30 September 2021 google scholar
3. American Psychological Association, “Crossroads the Psychology of Immigration in the New Century/ Report of the APA Presidential Task Force on Immigration - Executive Summary” (2012), 8 Date of access 09 November 2021 google scholar
4. Berry A, “Gilets jaunes : Comment rendre juste la taxe carbone et minimiser ses impacts sociaux?” (16.11.2018 Le Monde) Date of access 12 October 2021 google scholar
5. Blakemore AS, “Teitiota v New Zealand: A Step Forward in the Protection of Climate Refugees under International Human Rights Law?” (OxHRH Blog, 2020) Date of access 22 October 2021 google scholar
6. Climate Action Tracker, “CAT Climate Target Update Tracker” Date of access 12 November 2021 google scholar
7. Climate Watch, “Historical GHG Emissions” Date of access 06 November 2021 google scholar
8. EASAC, “Negative emission technologies: What role in meeting Paris Agreement targets?” (2018) 1-11 Date of access 00 November 2021 google scholar

9. European Implementation Network, “Country Map” Date of access 28 October 2021 google scholar
10. Germanwatch, “Global Climate Risk Index 2021” (25.01.2021 Reliefweb) Date of access 29 May 2021. google scholar
11. Global Carbon Atlas, “Country Emissions” Date of access 29 May 2021 google scholar
12. Huber D and Gulledge J, “Extreme Weather and Climate Change, Understanding the Link, Managing the Risk” (2011) Center for Climate and Energy Solutions Date of access 08 November 2021 google scholar
13. IOM, “A Complex Nexus” Date of access 21 October 2021 google scholar
14. IOM, “Discussion Note: Migration and The Environment” (2007) 1 Date of access 22 October 2021 google scholar
15. IOM, “World Migration Report 2020”, 21 Date of access 21 October 2021 google scholar
16. Mandal R, “Protection Mechanisms Outside of the 1951 Convention, Complementary Protection” (2005) Date of access 23 October 2021 google scholar
17. NASA, “Scientific Consensus: Earth’s Climate Is Warming” Date of access 10 October 2021 google scholar
18. Oxford English Dictionary, “Definition of ‘Anthropocene’”, Date of access 03 October 2021 google scholar
19. Oxford English Dictionary, “Definition of ‘Refugee’”, Date of access 15 September 2021. google scholar
20. Schmitz F, Kalaitzi A and Karakas B “Migrants accuse Greece of forced deportations” (Deutsche Welle 21 May 2020) Date of access 04 November 2021. google scholar
21. Schülke-Gill B and Bayer J, “Greece: Refugees attacked and pushed back in the Aegean” (Deutsche Welle 29 June 2020) Date of access 04 November 2021 google scholar
22. ScienceDaily, “ Xenophobia strongly linked to Brexit, regardless of voter age, gender or education” (2017) Date of access 18 October 2021 google scholar
23. The Economist, “The world is losing the war against climate change” (27.08.2018) Date of access 11 October 2021 google scholar
24. The Guardian, “Conflicts Fuelled by Climate Change Causing New Refugee Crisis, Warns UN” (17 January 2008) https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2008/jun/17/climatechange.food> Date of access 22 October 2021 google scholar
25. UNCHR, “Global Trends Forced Displacement in 2020”, 2 Date of access 15 September 2021 google scholar
26. UN Human Rights Committee, General Comment no .31 (80) Date of access 25 October 2021 google scholar
27. UN Secretary-General, World Commission on Environment and Development, “Our Common Future”, Date of access 07 November 2021 google scholar
28. UNCHR, “Climate Change and Disaster Displacement” Date of access 18 October 2021 google scholar
29. UNDP, “Human Development Report 2020”, 61 Date of access 19 October 2021 google scholar
30. UNHCR, “Legal Considerations Regarding Claims for International Protection Made in Context of the Adverse Effects of Climate Change and Disasters” Date of access 14 October 2021 google scholar
31. UNHCR, “Refugee Data Finder” Date of access 20 October 2021 google scholar
32. UNDP, “World’s Largest Survey of Public Opinion on Climate Change: A Majority of People Call for Wide-Ranging Action” (2021) Date of access 11 October 2021 google scholar
33. UNFCCC, “Climate Commitments Not On Track to Meet Paris Agreement Goals” as NDC Synthesis Report is Published”, (26.02.2021) Date of access 12 November 2021 google scholar
34. UN, “Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis” (2021), 5 Date of access 09 October 2021 google scholar
35. UN, “Only 11 Years Left to Prevent Irreversible Damage from Climate Change, Speakers Warn during General Assembly High-Level Meeting” (2019) Date of access 11 October 2021 google scholar
36. UN, “ The Climate Crisis - A Race We Can Win ” Date of access 27 May 2021 google scholar
37. WMO, “WMO Atlas of Mortality and Economic Loses from Weather, Climate and Water Extremes (1970-2019)”, 19 Date of access 21 October 2021 google scholar
38. Anderson B, “Hayali Cemaatler: Milliyetçiliğin Kökenleri ve Yayılması”, İskender Savaşır (trans.) (Metis Yayınları 2020) google scholar
39. Cooper JB, “Environmental Refugees: Meeting the Requirements of the Refugee Definition.” (1998) 6(2) New York University Environmental Law Journal 480-530 google scholar
40. Manou D, Mihr A, “Climate Change, Migration and Human Rights” in Dimitri Manau, Andrew Baldwin, Dug Cubie, Anja Mihr, Teresa Thorp (eds) Climate Change Migration and Human Rights (Routledge 2017) 3-8 google scholar
41. Duygun AM, “Popülist Anayasacılığa Giriş (Introduction to Populist Constitutionalism)” (2020) 9(18) Journal of Constitutional Law 397-464 google scholar
42. Edwards A, “Interational Refugee Law” in Rosemary Rayfuse and Shirley v. Scott (eds.), International Law in the Era of Climate Change (Edward Elgar Publishing 2012) 58-83 google scholar
43. Ekşi N, “İklim Mülteciliği (Climate Refugees)” (2016) 2(2) The Journal of Migration Studies 10-58 google scholar
44. Elçin D, “The principle of non-refoulement a comparative analysis between Turkish national law and international refugee law” in İbrahim Sirkeci, Doğa Elçin, Güven Şeker (eds.) “Politics and Law in Turkish Migration” (Transnational Press London, 2015), 39-50 google scholar
45. Ellis EC, “Anthropocene: A Very Short Introduction” (Oxford University Press 2018) google scholar
46. Gilens M and Page BI, “Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens” (2014) 12(3) Perspectives on Politics, American Political Science Association, 564581 google scholar
47. Güneş B and Çelenk B, “The Impasse of International Law on Climate-Induced Migration: Recent Developments and the United Nation’s January 2020 Decision on Climate Refugees” (2021) 23(3) Insight Turkey 209-231 google scholar
48. Harari YN, “Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind” (McClelland & Stewart 2014 google scholar
49. Harris D, O’Boyle M and Warbrick C (eds), “Law of the European Convention on Human Rights” Mehveş Bingöllü Kıldı, Ulaş Karan (trans.) (First edition in Turkish, Council of Europe, 2013) google scholar
50. Hathaway J and Foster M, “The Law of Refugee Status” (Second Edition Cambridge University Press Second Edition 2014) google scholar
51. Hathaway OA, “International Delegation and State Sovereignty” (2008) 71 Law and Contemporary Problems 115-150 google scholar
52. Hodgskiss M, Crockford P, Peng Y, Wing B and Horner T, “A productivity collapse to end Earth’s Great Oxidation” (2019) 116(35) PNAS 17207-17212 google scholar
53. Hughes D, “An Environmental History of the World” (Routledge 2009) 117-120 google scholar
54. Jahn D, “Quick and dirty: how populist parties in government affect greenhouse gas emissions in EU member states” (2021) 28(7) Journal of European Public Policy 980-997 google scholar
55. McAdam J, “Climate Change, Forged Migration, and International Law” (Oxford University Press 2012) google scholar
56. McNeill J and Engelke P, “The Great Acceleration: An Environmental History of the Anthropocene since 1945” (Harvard University Press 2016 google scholar
57. Grubb M, “The Economics of the Kyoto Protocol” (2003) 4(3) World Economics 143-189 google scholar
58. Munia H, Guillaume J, Wada Y, Veldkamp T, Virkki V and Kummu M “Future Transboundary Water Stress and Its Drivers Under Climate Change: A Global Study”, (2020) 8 Earth’s Future 1-21 google scholar
59. Turgut NY, “Çevresel Göç ve Çevre Göçmenleri Sorununun Çevre Hukukundaki Yeri (The Place of Enviromental Migration and Enviromental Migrants in Enviromental Law)” (2018) 31(139) Union of the Turkish Bar Associations Review 287-346. google scholar
60. Renaud F, Dun O, Warner K and Bogardi J, “A Decision Framework for Environmentally Induced Migration” (2011) 49 International Migration 5-29. google scholar
61. Safi S, “Ioane Teitiota Kiribati / Yeni Zelanda Davası ve BM İnsan Hakları Komitesi’nin İklim Mültecileri İle İlgili Tarihi Kararı (Ioane Teıtıota Kırıbatı / New Zealand Case And Un Human Rıghts Commıttee’s Hıstorıcal Decısıon On Clımate Refugees)” (2020) 22(2) Dokuz Eylül University Law School Review 509-540 google scholar
62. Schirrmeister B, Gugger M and Donoghue P, “Cyanobacteria and the Great Oxidation Event: evidence from genes and fossils” (2015) 58(5) Palaeontology 769-785 google scholar
63. Sifat N and Haseli Y, “A Critical Review of CO2 Capture Technologies and Prospects for Clean Power Generation” (2019) 12(21) Energies 1-26 < https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/21/4143/htm> Date of access 12 November 2021 google scholar
64. Steffen W, Crutzen PJ and McNeill JR, “The Anthropocene: Are Humans Now Overwhelming the Great Forces of Nature?” (2007) 36(8) Ambio 614-621 google scholar
65. Timmermann A and Friedrich T, (2016) “Late Pleistocene climate drivers of early human migration”, 538 Nature 92-95 google scholar
66. Topuzkanamış Ş, “Popüler Olmayan Anayasacılık” (2018) 20 Dokuz Eylül University Law School Review 125-197 google scholar
67. UNHCR, “Legal Considerations Regarding Claims for International Protection Made in context of the Adverse Effects of Climate Change and Disasters” (2021) 33(1) International Journal of Refugee Law 151-165 google scholar
68. Uyar B, “İnsan Haklarına Ekolojik Yaklaşım Çerçevesinde İklim Mülteciliği” (Turhan Kitabevi 2021). google scholar
69. Versteeg M, “Unpopular Constitutionalism” (2014) 89 (3) Indiana Law Journal 1133-1190 google scholar
70. Volk C, “The Problem of Sovereignty in Globalized Times” (2019) (Law, Culture and the Humanities) Sage Publication 1-23 google scholar
71. Weiss E, “Intergenerational Equity in International Law” (1987) 81 Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting 126-133 google scholar
72. African Union Convention For the Protection and Assistance of Internally Displaced Persons in Africa (Kampala Convention), (adopted on 23 October 2009, entered into force 06 December 2012) google scholar
73. Cartagena Declaration on Refugees (Cartagena Declaration), Adopted by the Colloquium on the International Protection of Refugees in Central America, Mexico and Panama (adopted on 22 November 1984) google scholar
74. Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, (adopted on 28 July 1951, entered into force 22 April 1954) google scholar
75. “Draft Convention on the International Status of Environmentally-Displaced Persons” (third version) google scholar
76. European Convention on Human Rights, (adopted on 4 November 1950, entered into force 3 September 1953) google scholar
77. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) (Adopted on 16 December 1966, entered into force 23 March 1976) google scholar
78. Organization of African Unity (OAU) Convention, Governing the Specific Aspects of Refugee Problems in Africa (adopted on 10 September 1969, entered into force 20 June 1974) google scholar
79. Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees (adopted in 31 January 1967, entered into force 4 October 1967) google scholar
80. UN General Assembly, New York Decleration for Refugees and Migrants, <”https://www.un.org/ en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/71/1> Date of access 22 October 2021 google scholar
81. United Nation Charter (adopted 26 June 1945, entered into force 24 October 1945) google scholar
82. Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, (signed on 23 May 1969, entered into force on 27 January 1980) google scholar
83. Airey v. Ireland, App no 6289/73 (ECtHR 09 October 1979) google scholar
84. I.L. v. Italian Ministry of the Interior and Attorney General, (Corte Suprema di Cassazione 2021) google scholar
85. Ilias and Ahmad v. Hungary, App no 47287/15 (ECtHR (GC) 21 November 2019) google scholar
86. Ioane Teitiota v. New Zealand”, CCPR/C/127/D/2728/2016 (UN Human Rights Committee 24 October 2019) google scholar
87. N.D. and N.T. v. Spain, App no 8675/15 and 8697/15 (ECtHR (GC) 13 February 2020) google scholar
88. Regina v. Special Adjudicator es parte Ullah, (UKHL 26 2004) google scholar
89. Soering v. United Kingdom, App no 14038/88 (ECtHR 07 July 1989) google scholar
90. State of the Netherlands v. Urgenda Foundation, Case Number: 19/00135 ECLI:NL:HR:2019:2007 (The SupremeCourt of the Netherlands 2019 google scholar