Sampling techniques involving human subjects: Applications, pitfalls, and suggestions for further studies

Abstract

The most commonly used sampling techniques in systematic investigations are probability and nonprobability methods. While probability sampling is based on the principle of a random selection of participants in a particular study, non-random selection is the basis of probability sampling. The random and non-random classifications appear to have some potential flaws and are insufficient to represent all sampling procedures involving human participants. Similarly, most authors believe that they use random sampling techniques, although, in reality, they do not use true random sampling. Therefore, the objective of this article is to highlight that sampling techniques can be characterized as true-random, quasi-random, or nonrandom, rather than merely random and non-random. Attempts have been made to show how inadequate random and non-random sampling methods are, the characteristics of true-random, quasi-random, and nonrandom sampling procedures, and when each sampling procedure is appropriate. Since each unit of the population is randomly selected and the chance of selecting the unit is equal, a real random sample is used to estimate the characteristics of the population directly from the sample. With quasi-random sampling, it is not possible to directly estimate population characteristics, but only indirectly. However, population characteristics cannot be directly or indirectly estimated by using non-random sampling techniques.

Keywords

• True-random;
• quasi-random;
• non-random
• sampling techniques

References

1. Adam, A. M. (2020). Sample size determination in survey research. Journal of Scientific Research & Reports, 26(5), 90–97. https://doi.org/10.9734/JSRR/2020/v26i530263 Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. (2010). Introduction to research in education (8th ed.). Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
2. Berndt, A. E. (2020). Sampling methods. Journal of Human Lactation, 36(2), 224–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334420906850 Bordens, K. S., & Abbott, B. B. (2018). Research design and methods: A process approach (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education. Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., Bywaters, D., & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: Complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(8), 652–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120927206 Cassady, R. (1945). Statistical sampling techniques and marketing research. Journal of Marketing, 9, 317–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224294500900401 Chander, N. G. (2017). Sample size estimation. Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society, 17(3), 217–218. https://doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_169_17 Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.
3. Curry, L. A., Nembhard, I. M., & Bradley, E. H. (2009). Qualitative and mixed methods provide unique contributions to outcomes research. Circulation, 119, 1442–1452. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.742775
4. Delice, A. (2010). The sampling issues in quantitative research. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 10(4), 2001–2018. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ919871.pdf Elfil, M., & Negida, A. (2017). Sampling methods in clinical research; An educational review. Emergency, 5(1), e52. https://doi.org/10.22037/emergency.v5i1.15215
5. Etikan, I., & Bala, K. (2017). Combination of probability random sampling method with non probability random sampling method (sampling versus sampling methods). Biometrics & Biostatistics International Journal, 5(6), 210–213. https://doi.org/10.15406/bbij.2017.05.00148
6. Gill, S. L. (2020). Qualitative sampling methods. Journal of Human Lactation, 36(4), 579–581. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334420949218 Israel, G. D. (2003). Determining sample size. https://www.tarleton.edu/academicassessment/documents/samplesize.pdf Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. (2020). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (7th ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.
7. Kadam, P., & Bhalerao, S. (2010). Sample size calculation. International Journal of Ayurveda Research, 1(1), 55. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-7788.59946 Khaldi, K. (2017). Quantitative, qualitative or mixed research: Which research paradigm to use? Journal of Educational and Social Research, 7(2), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.5901/jesr.2017.v7n2p15
8. Martinez-mesa, J., González-chica, D. A., Duquia, R. P., Bastos, J. L., & Bonamigo, R. R. (2016). Sampling: How to select participants in my research study? An Bras Dermatol, 91(3), 326–330. https://doi.org/10.1590/abd1806-4841.20165254

9. Mulisa, F. (2022). When does a researcher choose a quantitative, qualitative, or mixed research approach? Interchange, 53(1), 113–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-021-09447-z Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., Hoagwood, K., Angeles, L., & Northwest, K. P. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
10. Salganik, M. J., & Heckathorn, D. D. (2004). Sampling and estimation in hidden populations using respondent-driven sampling. Sociological Methodology, 34(1), 193–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0081-1750.2004.00152.x
11. Sargeant, J. (2012). Qualitative research part II: Participants, analysis, and quality assurance. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 4(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.4300/jgme-d-11-00307.1
12. Singh, A. S., & Masuku, M. B. (2014). Sampling techniques & determination of sample size in applied statistics research: An overview. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, 2(11), 1–22. http://ijecm.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/21131.pdf
13. Taherdoost, H. (2016). Sampling methods in research methodology; How to choose a sampling technique for research. International Journal of Academic Research in Management (IJARM), 5(2), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3205035
14. Walters, W. H. (2021). Survey design, sampling, and significance testing: Key issues. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 47(3), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102344