Research Article

Justifying academic dishonesty: A survey of Canadian university students

Volume: 7 Number: 1 December 30, 2021
EN

Justifying academic dishonesty: A survey of Canadian university students

Abstract

Academic dishonesty is a growing problem in the higher education sector. Using a sample of 321 undergraduate students at a medium-sized Canadian university, this paper explores the respondents’ acceptability of the various reasons for engagement in academically dishonest behaviour. The findings revealed that respondents displayed moderately negative attitudes toward academic dishonesty and that the top three circumstances under which academically dishonest behaviour would be considered acceptable were pressure to maintain a scholarship, pressure from parents to perform well, and the heavy academic work load. Multiple ordinary least-squares regression analysis revealed that male respondents and those who reported a higher family income, enrolled in more classes, witnessed academic misconduct more frequently, expressed dissatisfaction with academic performance, indicated dissatisfaction with school life, placed less emphasis on intrinsic motivation to pursue higher education, and adopted a surface approach to learning were found to be associated with a greater likelihood of accepting the various justifications for academic dishonesty. The results of this investigation may be utilized by university administrators, academic advisors, and academic counselors to aid in the design of support services and interventions (e.g., explicit guidelines and practical teaching/learning resources) that will serve to prevent academic misconduct and to promote academic integrity.

Keywords

References

  1. Alt, D., & Geiger, B. (2012). Goal orientations and tendency to neutralize academic cheating: An ecological perspective. Psychological Studies, 57(4), 404-416.
  2. Anderman, E.M., Griesinger, T., & Westerfield, G. (1998). Motivation and cheating during early adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(1), 84-93.
  3. Anderman, E.M., & Won, S. (2019) Academic cheating in disliked classes, Ethics & Behavior, 29(1), 1-22.
  4. Bacon, A.M., McDaid, C., Williams, N., & Corr, P.J. (2020). What motivates academic dishonesty in students? A reinforcement sensitivity theory explanation. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(1), 152-166.
  5. Balakrishnan, A., Palma, P.A., Patenaude, J., & Campbell, L. (2017). A 4-study replication of the moderating effects of greed on socioeconomic status and unethical behaviour. Scientific Data, 4(1), 1-7.
  6. Ballantine, J.A., Guo, X., Larres, P., & Larres, P. (2018). Can future managers and business executives be influenced to behave more ethically in the workplace? The impact of approaches to learning on business students’ cheating behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 149(1), 245-258.
  7. Beasley, E.M. (2014). Students reported for cheating explain what they think would have stopped them. Ethics & Behavior, 24(3), 229-52.
  8. Bernardi, R.A., Banzhoff, C.A., Martino, A.M., & Savasta, K.J. (2012). Challenges to academic integrity: Identifying the factors associated with the cheating chain. Accounting Education, 21, 247-263.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Other Fields of Education

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Rozzet Jurdi-hage This is me
Canada

H. Sam Hage This is me
Canada

Publication Date

December 30, 2021

Submission Date

July 1, 2021

Acceptance Date

December 26, 2021

Published in Issue

Year 2021 Volume: 7 Number: 1

APA
Chow, H., Jurdi-hage, R., & Hage, H. S. (2021). Justifying academic dishonesty: A survey of Canadian university students. International Journal of Academic Research in Education, 7(1), 16-28. https://doi.org/10.17985/ijare.951714
AMA
1.Chow H, Jurdi-hage R, Hage HS. Justifying academic dishonesty: A survey of Canadian university students. IJARE. 2021;7(1):16-28. doi:10.17985/ijare.951714
Chicago
Chow, Henry, Rozzet Jurdi-hage, and H. Sam Hage. 2021. “Justifying Academic Dishonesty: A Survey of Canadian University Students”. International Journal of Academic Research in Education 7 (1): 16-28. https://doi.org/10.17985/ijare.951714.
EndNote
Chow H, Jurdi-hage R, Hage HS (December 1, 2021) Justifying academic dishonesty: A survey of Canadian university students. International Journal of Academic Research in Education 7 1 16–28.
IEEE
[1]H. Chow, R. Jurdi-hage, and H. S. Hage, “Justifying academic dishonesty: A survey of Canadian university students”, IJARE, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 16–28, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.17985/ijare.951714.
ISNAD
Chow, Henry - Jurdi-hage, Rozzet - Hage, H. Sam. “Justifying Academic Dishonesty: A Survey of Canadian University Students”. International Journal of Academic Research in Education 7/1 (December 1, 2021): 16-28. https://doi.org/10.17985/ijare.951714.
JAMA
1.Chow H, Jurdi-hage R, Hage HS. Justifying academic dishonesty: A survey of Canadian university students. IJARE. 2021;7:16–28.
MLA
Chow, Henry, et al. “Justifying Academic Dishonesty: A Survey of Canadian University Students”. International Journal of Academic Research in Education, vol. 7, no. 1, Dec. 2021, pp. 16-28, doi:10.17985/ijare.951714.
Vancouver
1.Henry Chow, Rozzet Jurdi-hage, H. Sam Hage. Justifying academic dishonesty: A survey of Canadian university students. IJARE. 2021 Dec. 1;7(1):16-28. doi:10.17985/ijare.951714

Cited By