A Study on the Development of a Life-Focused Foreign Language Acquisition Scale for Preschool Children: English Sample

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1, 33 - 53, 30.04.2017

Banu Uslu Aysel Çağdaş

https://doi.org/10.17985/ijare.398952

Cited By: 2

Öz

Designing scales for preschool children in order to promote their foreign language acquisition is a complex struggle that likely involves efforts at many stages within the process of early childhood education. There is a wide range of options currently being considered for how to best measure children’s foreign language learning. The use of scientifically validated language scale is regarded as an important method. Despite a large body of evidence in terms of reliable indicators of foreign language acquisition in preschool children, there has not been a standardized, quick, easy, functional and life-based scale measurement. The purpose of the present study was to develop a valid and reliable "Life-Focused Foreign Language Acquisition Scale" (LFFLAS) for the evaluation of foreign language proficiency of preschool children who are 50-74 months-old. The study was conducted in the general survey model. 120 children from private kindergartens affiliated with the Konya National Education Directorate participated in the study. Findings related to the construct validity of the scale were obtained by factor analysis method. Based on Tetrachoric Factor Analysis, 4 sub-dimensions were found. Findings related to the reliability of the scale were obtained with the KR 20 (internal consistency) and score invariance techniques. The findings of the study revealed that the reliability coefficients related to internal consistency and score invariance of sub-scales related to LFFLAS were sufficient and the scale is valid and reliable in measuring preschool children’s foreign language acquisition. There were significant differences in the sub-scales of the scale depending on gender and age variables. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Preschool, Foreign Language Acquisition, Scale, English

Kaynakça

• Bacon, D. R., Sauer, P. L., & Young, M. (1995). Composite Reliability in Structural Equations Modeling. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 55, 394-406.
• Bialystok, E. (2010). Global-Local And Trail-Making Tasks by Monolingual and Bilingual Children: Beyond inhibition. Developmental Psychology 46, 93–105.
• Bialystok, E., & Martin, M. M. (2004). Attention and İnhibition İn Bilingual Children: Evidence from the Dimensional Change Card Sort Task. Developmental Science, 7, 325–339.
• Black, M. M.(2004). Commonly Used Assessment and Screening Instruments. HIPPY USA
• Bekleyen, N. (2016). Foreign Language Teaching to Children. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık
• Boehm, A. (2001). Boehm Test of Basic Concepts 3–Preschool Version. New York: Psychological Corpo-ration.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2004). Veri Analizi El Kitabı. Ankara: Pegema Yayıncılık.
• Brown, H. D. (2004). Language Assessment Principles and Classroom Practices. White Plains, NY: Pearson Education, Inc.
• Bzoch, K., League, R., & Brown, V. (2003). Receptive-Expressive Emergent Language Test (3rd Ed.). Austin, TX: PRO- ED.
• Descoeudres, A. (1930). Test de Descoeudres.
• Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1997). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (3rd Ed.). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
• Fremer, J., & Wall, J. (2004). Why use tests and assessments: Questions and answers. In J. Wall & G. Walz (Eds.), Measuring up: Assessment issues for teachers, counselors and Administrators (pp. 3–19). Greensboro, NC: ERIC Counseling and Student Services Clearinghouse
• Hendrick, D., Prather, E., & Tobin, A. (1984). Sequenced Inventory of Communication Development (Rev. Ed.). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
• Hresko, W., Reid, D. K., & Hammill, D. (1999). Test of Early Language Development–(3rd Ed.) New York: Psychological Corpo-ration.
• Invernizzi, M., Sullivan, A., & Meier, J. (2001). Phonological awareness literacy screening (PALS Pre-K). Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
• Krashen, Stephen D. (1981). Second Language Acquisition & Second Language Learning. University of Southern California. Pergamon Press Inc.
• Lightbown, P. & Spada, N. (1999) How Languages are Learned. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Limbosch, N., Luminet-Jasinski, A. & Dierkens-Dopchie, N. (1968). La dsylexie â l'ecole primaire. Bruxelles: Editions de L'Institut de Sociologie
• Love, J.M. (2001). Instrumentation for State Readiness Assessment: Issues in Measuring Children’s Early Development & Learning. Mathematica Policy Research. Princeton, NJ.
• McMillan, J. H. (2007). Classroom Assessment: Principles and Practice for Effective Standards-Based Instruction (4th Ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Allyn and Bacon.
• Mann, T., & Powers, S. (1997). Screening & Assessment for Head Start Programs Serving Infants and Toddlers. Paper presented at the 24th National Head Start Association Training Conference. Boston, MA.
• Martinez, J. M. & Lesaux, K. L. (2011). Early Home Language Use and Later Vocabulary Development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, (3) 535–546.
• MEB, (2013). Ministry of National Education General Directorate of Basic Education, Preschool Education Program. Ankara.
• Milton, J. (2009). Measuring Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
• Milton, J., & Daller, H. (2007). The Interface between Theory and Learning İn Vocabulary Acquisition. Paper presented at the EUROSLA, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
• Minami, M. (2002). Book Review. (Bialystok, Ellen (2001). Bilingualism in Development: Language, Literacy and Cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.). Bilingual Research Journal, 26:3,729-735.
• Muter, V., Hulme, C., & Snowling, M. (1999). Phonological Abilities Test. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
• Panter, A. T., Swygert, K. A., Dahlstrom, W. G., & Tanaka, J. S. (1997). Factor Analytic Approaches to Personality İtem- Level Data. Journal of Personality Assessment, 68, 561-589.
• Patterson, G.R., DeBaryshe, B. & Ramsey, E. (1990). A Developmental Perspective on Antisocial Behavior. American Psychologist, 44, 329-335.
• Pekrun, R. (2006) The Control-Value Theory of Achievement Emotions: Assumptions, Corollaries, and Implications for Educational Research and Practice. Educational Psychology Review, December 2006, Vol. 18, Issue 4, pp 315–341.
• Pinter, A. (2011) Children Learning Second Languages, pp. 1-2. Centre for Applied Linguistics, University of Warwick, UK.
• Reuterberg, S. & Gustafsson, J.-E. (1992). Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Reliability: Testing Measurement Model Assumptions. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 795-811.
• Sawyer, D. J. (1987). Test of Awareness of Language Segments. Rockville, MD: Aspen
• Shepard, L.A., Taylor, G.A., and Kagan, S.L. (1996). Trends in Early Childhood Assessment Policies and Practices. Boulder, CO: University of Colorado, School of Education.
• Sünbül, A. M. (2004). Validity and Reliability of Thinking Styles Scale. Education and Science Journal, 132, 25-42 (2004).
• Thal, D.J., O'Hanlon, L., Clemmons, M. and Fralin, L. (1999). Validity of a Parent Report Measure of Vocabulary & Syntax for Preschool Children with Language Impairment. Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research, 42, 482-496.
• Torgesen, J. K. & Bryant B. R., (1994). Test of Phonological Awareness (TOPA). Austin, Tex.: Pro-Ed
• VanTol, Kathleen M. (2009). Technical Adequacy of Curriculum-Based Measures of Vocabulary Growth for Preschool English Language Learners. PhD Dissertation. Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, Michigan.
• Yoneda, M. (2012). Designing Assessment Tools: The Principles of Language Assessment Bull. Mukogawa Women’s Univ. Humanities and Social Sciences, 60, 41-49.
• Wagner, R.K., Torgesen, J. K., and Rashotte, C.A. (1999). Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing. (CTOPP) Willis, M., & Ohashi, Y. (2012). A Model of L2 Vocabulary Learning and Retention. The Language Learning Journal, 40 (1), 125-137.
• Zimmerman, I., Steiner, V., & Pond, R. (2002). Preschool Language Scale (4th ed.) and Preschool Language Scale– Spanish Edition New York: Psychological Corporation.