Research Article

Validity and Reliability of The Cancer Loneliness and The Cancer-Related Negative Social Expectations Scale

Volume: 7 Number: 3 September 15, 2020
TR EN

Validity and Reliability of The Cancer Loneliness and The Cancer-Related Negative Social Expectations Scale

Abstract

There is a need for cancer-specific tools to evaluate loneliness and cancer-related negative social expectations before developing interventions for cancer patients. The purpose of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of the Cancer Loneliness and the Cancer-related Negative Social Expectations Scale. Data were collected from 300 cancer patients registered to an oncology outpatient clinic of a University Hospital for this methodological study. In the data collection, Patient Information Form, Cancer Loneliness Scale and Cancer-related Negative Social Expectations Scale and the General Loneliness Scale were used. The Cronbach’s Alpha coefficient of the Cancer Loneliness Scale was found to be .88, Spearman-Brown correlation value was found to be .81, CFI, .98, GFI, .96, 𝑋2/SD, 2.99 and RMSEA .08. As for the Negative Social Expectations Scale, Cronbach alpha value was found as .82, Spearman-Brown correlation value .86, CFI 1.00, GFI 1.00, 𝑋2/SD 1.33 and RMSEA .02. The study revealed those both scales were highly reliable and indices of fit showed perfect fit. These scales are highly valid and reliable instruments for the Turkish society.

Keywords

Supporting Institution

Pamukkale University Scientific Research Projects

Project Number

2018 SABE020

References

  1. Adams, R.N. (2016). Measures of Cancer-Related Loneliness and Negative Social Expectations: Development and Preliminary Validation, in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Doctoral dissertation). Indiana, Purdue University, 2016.
  2. Adams, R.N., Mosher, C.E., Rand, K.L., Hirsh, A.T., Monahan, P.O., Abonour, R. & Kroenke, K. (2017). The Cancer Loneliness Scale and Cancer-Related Negative Social Expectations Scale: Development and validation. Qual Life Res., 26(7), 1901 1913. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1518-4
  3. Adams, R.N., Mosher, C.E., Winger, J.G., Abonour, R., & Kroenke, K. (2018). Cancer-related loneliness mediates the relationships between social constraints and symptoms among cancer patients, J Behav Med., 41(2), 243–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-017-9892-5
  4. Boyle, G. J., Saklofske, D. H., & Matthews, G. (2015). Criteria for Selection and Evaluation of Scales and Measures. In G. J. Boyle, D. H. Saklofske, & G. Matthews (Eds.), Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Constructs (p. 3–15). Elsevier Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-386915-9.00001-2
  5. Bray, F., Ferlay, J., Soerjomataram, I., Siegel, R.L., Torre, L.A., & Jemal, A. (2018). Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality World wide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin., 68(6), 394 424. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21492
  6. Brintzenhofe-Szoc, K.M., Levin, T.T., Li, Y., Kissane, D.W., & Zabora, J.R. (2009). Mixed anxiety/depression symptoms in a large cancer cohort: Prevalence by cancer type. Psychosomatics, 50(4), 383-391. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.psy.50.4.383
  7. Can, A. (2018). SPSS ile Bilimsel Araştırma Sürecinde Nicel Veri Analizi, Bir Ölçme Aracı ile Yapılan Ölçümün Güvenirliliğini Belirleme (p. 385-394). Ankara: Pegem Yayıncılık.
  8. Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (Eds). (2014). Sosyal Bilimler için Çok Değişkenli İstatistik SPSS ve LISREL Uygulamaları, Yapısal Eşitlik Modeli (p 251-407). Ankara: Pegem Yayıncılık.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Studies on Education

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

September 15, 2020

Submission Date

March 29, 2020

Acceptance Date

June 11, 2020

Published in Issue

Year 2020 Volume: 7 Number: 3

APA
Kara, E., & Özen Çınar, İ. (2020). Validity and Reliability of The Cancer Loneliness and The Cancer-Related Negative Social Expectations Scale. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 7(3), 392-403. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.711073

Cited By

23823             23825             23824