Adaptation of the Adlerian Personality Priority Assessment into Turkish

Yıl 2021, , 914 - 927, 04.12.2021

Abdi Güngör , Dalena Dıllman Taylor

https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.863323

Öz

Personality priorities are important concepts in Adlerian theory, contributing to understanding and conceptualizing clients’ lifestyles. Even though Adlerian psychology promises multicultural applications and has been interested in Turkey, no instrument measuring personality priorities has been developed or adapted into Turkish. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to adapt the Adlerian Personality Priority Assessment (APPA) into Turkish and examine its psychometric properties with a sample of Turkish undergraduate students. This study was conducted in three steps. In the first step, a linguistic equivalence test was performed with a sample of 73 students enrolled at the Department of English Language Education. In the second step, the structure of the APPA was examined using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses with a sample of 1,279 undergraduate students. In the final step, test-retest reliability was tested with a sample of 93 undergraduate students within 4-week interval. The results of the linguistic equivalency study revealed that translations were linguistically and culturally proper. According to the exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, the Turkish form of the APPA consisted of 24 items loaded with four factors consistent with the original form. The results also revealed good levels of internal and test-retest reliabilities. The findings of this study showed that the Turkish form of the APPA is a valid and reliable instrument, and it can be used in research and practice with Turkish populations. The results and limitations were discussed, along with implications for future research and practice.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Adlerian therapy, The Adlerian personality priority assessment, Adaptation, Psychometric properties, Reliability, Validity

Kaynakça

• Abubakar, A., Dimitrova, R., Adams, B., Jordanov, V., & Stefenel, D. (2013). Procedures for translating and evaluating equivalence of questionnaires for use in cross-cultural studies. Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Braşov, 6 (55), 79-86.
• Adler, A. (1929). The science of living. Greenberg.
• Adler, A. (1931). What life could mean to you. Hazelden.
• Akçabozan, N. B., & Sümer, Z. H. (2016). Adler yaklaşımında aile danışmanlığı [Adlerian Family Counseling]. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 6(46), 87-101.
• Ansbacher, H., & Ansbacher, R. (Eds.). (1956). The individual psychology of Alfred Adler. Basic Books, Inc.
• Ashby, J. S., Kottman, T., & Rice, K. G. (1998). Adlerian personality priorities: Psychological attitudinal differences. Journal of Counseling and Development, 76, 467-474. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.1998.tb02706.x
• Ashby, J. S., Kottman, T., & Stoltz, K. B. (2006). Multidimensional perfectionism and personality profiles. The Journal of Individual Psychology, 62, 312-323.
• Brown, T. A. (2014). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guilford Publications.
• Carlson, E. D. (2000). A case study in translation methodology using the health‐promotion lifestyle profile II. Public Health Nursing, 17(1), 61-70. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1446.2000.00061.x
• Carlson, J. M., & Carlson, J. D. (2000). The application of Adlerian psychotherapy with Asian-American clients. Individual Psychology, 56(2), 214-225.
• Carlson, J., Watts, R. E., & Maniacci, M. (2006) Adlerian therapy: Theory and practice. American Psychological Association.
• Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation, 10(7). https://doi.org/10.7275/jyj1-4868
• Dillman Taylor, D., & Mullen, P. R. (2019). Adlerian Personality Priority Assessment: A Psychometric Evaluation. The Journal of Individual Psychology, 75(2), 122-144.
• Dillman Taylor, D., Bratton, S. C. & Henson, R. K. (2019): Confirming the Constructs of Adlerian Personality Priority Assessment. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2019.1595814
• Dillman Taylor, D., Gungor, A., Blount, A. J., & Mullen, P. R. (2018). Personality Priorities and Perceived Wellness Among Counseling Trainees. The Journal of Individual Psychology, 74(2), 188-208.
• Dillman Taylor, D., Ray, D. C., & Henson, R. K. (2015). Development and factor structure of the Adlerian Personality Priority Assessment. Archives of Assessment Psychology, 5(1), 23-36.
• Ergün-Başak, B., & Ceyhan, E. (2011). Psikolojik danışma ilişkisinde Adler yaklaşımına göre cesaretlendirme [Adlerian Encouragement in Counseling Relationship]. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 4(35), 92-99.
• Geisinger, K. F. (1994). Cross-cultural normative assessment: Translation and adaptation issues influencing the normative interpretation of assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 6(4), 304-312. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.304
• Gerbing, D. W., & Hamilton, J. G. (1996). Viability of exploratory factor analysis as a precursor to confirmatory factor analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 3, 62 72. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519609540030
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. Pearson.
• Hambleton, R. K., Merenda, P. F., & Spielberger, C. D. (2004). Adapting educational and psychological tests for cross-cultural assessment. Psychology Press.
• Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53-60.
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria versus New Alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
• Kefir, N. (1971). Priorities: A different approach to life style. Paper presented at the International Committee of Adlerian Summer School and Institutes (ICASSI), Tel Aviv, Israel.
• Kefir, N. (1981). Impasse/priority therapy. In R. Corsini (Ed.), Handbook of innovative psychotherapies. Wiley.
• Kefir, N., & Corsini, R. J. (1974). Dispositional sets: A contribution to typology. The Journal of Individual Psychology, 30, 163-178.
• Kern, R. M., Wheeler, M. S., & Curlette, W. L. (1997). BASIS-A inventory interpretive manual: A psychological theory. TRT Associates.
• Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
• Langenfeld, S., & Main, F. (1983). Personality priorities: A factor analytic study. The Journal of Individual Psychology, 39, 40-51.
• Mvududu, N. H., & Sink, C. A. (2013). Factor analysis in counseling research and practice. Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation, 4(2), 75 98. https://doi.org/10.1177/2150137813494766
• Oberst, U. E. & Stewart, A. E. (2003) Adlerian psychotherapy: An advanced approach to individual psychology. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
• O'Rourke, N., Psych, R., & Hatcher, L. (2013). A step-by-step approach to using SAS for factor analysis and structural equation modeling. SAS Institute.
• Pallant, J. (2010). SPSS Survival Manual, (4th ed.). McGraw Hill.
• Pew, W. L. (1976). The number one priority. John’s Hospital, Marriage and Family Education Center.
• Sümer, Z. H., & Rasmussen, P. R. (2012). Individual Psychology in Turkey. Journal of Individual Psychology, 68(4), 411-421.
• Sweeney, T. J. (2009). adlerian counseling and psychotherapy: A practitioner’s approach (5th ed.). Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
• Tabachnick, B., & Fidell, L. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Pearson.
• Ward, D. E. (1979). Implications of personality priority assessment for the counseling process. Individual Psychologist, 16(2), 12-16.
• Weston, R., & Gore, P. A. J. (2006). A brief guide to structural equation modeling. Counseling Psychologist, 34(5), 719–751. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006286345