Assessment tools and strategies used by Jamaican secondary school teachers

Abstract

There is an increasing understanding that assessment is an integral part of teaching and learning and that teachers are largely not adequately prepared for their assessment responsibilities. Consequently, there is a need for research on what teachers need to improve their assessment practices. To determine what Jamaican secondary school teachers need, this mixed methods study was conducted to describe the assessment tools and strategies used by secondary school teachers of various subjects and in different types of schools as the basis for future interventions. Data was collected from a survey of 1088 secondary school teachers of varying subjects and school types and further explored through interviews and observations of 32 teachers of English. Analysis of the data using descriptive statistics and ANOVA in the quantitative phase revealed that secondary school teachers primarily used traditional assessment tools and strategies, particularly tests, despite school type. Pattern coding and pattern matching in the qualitative phase confirmed these results. The findings also revealed statistically significant differences in the frequency of use of traditional and alternative assessment tools and strategies based on the subject the teachers taught. Qualitative explorations revealed that school policies that require a quota of grades and state or express positive attitudes towards tests influenced teachers despite school type to use traditional methods. The findings imply that school administrators need to implement supportive school-level policies and display positive attitudes toward alternative assessments to maximize the use of assessment to improve learning.

Keywords

• Classroom assessment
• Jamaica
• Traditional assessment
• Alternative assessment
• Assessment tools

References

1. Acar-Erdol, T., & Yıldızlı, H. (2018). Classroom Assessment Practices of Teachers in Türkiye. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 587 602. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11340a
2. Adeyemi, B. (2015). The efficacy of authentic assessment and portfolio assessment in the learning of social studies in junior secondary schools in Osun state, Nigeria. IFE Psychologia: An International Journal, 23(2), 125-132.
3. Alkharusi, H. (2011). Teachers' classroom assessment skills: Influence of gender, subject area, grade level, teaching experience and in-service assessment training. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 8(2), 39-48).
4. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education (Eds.). (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association.
5. Berry, R. (2008). Assessment for learning. Hong Kong University Press.
6. Berry, R. (2010). Teachers’ orientations towards selecting assessment strategies. New Horizons in Education, 58(1), 96-107.
7. Bland, L.M., & Gareis, C.R. (2018). Performance assessments: A review of definitions, quality characteristics, and outcomes associated with their use in K-12 schools. Teacher Educators' Journal, 11, 52-69.
8. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102

9. Bol, L., Stephenson, P.L., O’Connell, A.A., & Nunnery, J.A. (1998). Influence of experience, grade level, and subject area on teachers’ assessment practices. The Journal of Educational Research, 91, 323–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220679809597562
10. Bramwell-Lalor, S. (2019) Assessment for learning on sustainable development. In: Leal Filho W. (eds) Encyclopedia of sustainability in higher education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63951-2_1-1
11. Brookhart, S.M. (2009). Assessment and examinations. In L.J. Sasha & A.G. Dworkin (Eds.), International handbook of research on teachers and teaching. Springer Science & Business Media.
12. Brookhart, S.M. (2013). Comprehensive assessment systems in service of learning: Getting the balance right. In R. W. Lissitz (Ed.), Informing the practice of teaching using formative and interim assessment: A systems approach (pp. 165–184). Information Age Publishing.
13. Buhagiar, M. (2007). Classroom assessment within the alternative assessment paradigm: Revisiting the territory. Curriculum Journal, 18(1), 39 56. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585170701292174
14. Burke, K. (2009). How to assess authentic learning. Corwin Press.
15. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative data analysis. Sage.
16. Cobern, W.W., & Adams, B.A. (2020). Establishing survey validity: A practical guide. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 7(3), 404 419. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.21449/ijate.781366
17. Clarke, M.G. (2011). Rescue upgraded high schools – Gov't must address inequities in education sector. Retrieved from http://jamaicagleaner.com/gleaner/20110821/cleisure/cleisure2.html
18. Creswell, J. (2014). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.
19. Dandis, M.A. (2013). The assessment methods that are used in a secondary mathematics class. Journal for Educators, Teachers and Trainers, 4(2), 133–143.
20. DiCicco-Bloom, B., & Crabtree, B.F. (2006). The qualitative research interview. Medical Education, 40(4), 314–321. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02418.x
21. Dikli, S. (2003). Assessment at a distance: Traditional vs. alternative assessments. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 2(3), 13–19.
22. Dogan, M. (2011). Student teachersʼ views about assessment and evaluation methods in mathematics. Educational Research and Reviews, 6(5), 417–431.
23. Duncan, C.R., & Noonan, B. (2007). Factors Affecting Teachers’ Grading and Assessment Practices. The Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 53(1), 1–21.
24. Esomonu, N.P., & Eleje, L.I. (2020). Effect of diagnostic testing on students’ achievement in secondary school quantitative economics. World Journal of Education, 10(3), 178-187. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v10n3p178
25. Fraenkel, J.R., & Wallen, N.E. (2003). How to design and evaluate research in education (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
26. Gronlund, N.E. (2006). Assessment of student achievement (8th ed.). Pearson.
27. Guha, R., Wagner, T., Darling-Hammond, L., Taylor, T., & Curtis, D. (2018). The promise of performance assessments: Innovations in high school learning and college admission. Learning Policy Institute.
28. Guskey, T.R., & Link, L.J. (2019). Exploring the factors teachers consider in determining students’ grades. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 26(3), 303-320.
29. Hess, K., Colby, R., & Joseph, D. (2020). Deeper competency-based learning: Making equitable, student-centered, sustainable shifts. Corwin.
30. Jiang, Y. (2020). Teacher classroom questioning practice and assessment literacy: Case studies of four English Language teachers in Chinese universities. Frontiers in Education, 5(23), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00023
31. Johnson, B., & Turner, L.A. (2003). Data collection strategies in mixed methods research. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioural research (pp. 297–319). Sage.
32. Koh, K. (2017). Authentic assessment. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. Retrieved from https://oxfordre.com/education/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.001.0001/acrefore-9780190264093-e-22.
33. Kubiszyn, T., & Borich, G. (2013). Educational testing and measurement: Classroom application and practice (10th ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
34. Marshall, C., & Rossman, G.B. (2016). Designing qualitative research (5th ed.). Sage.
35. McMillan, J.H. (2001). Secondary teachers’ classroom assessment and grading practices. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 20(1), 20 32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2001.tb00055.x
36. McMillan, J.H. (2003). Understanding and improving teachers’ classroom assessment decision-making: Implications for theory and practice. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 22(4), 34–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2003.tb00142.x
37. McMillan, J.H. (2014). Classroom assessment: Principles and practice for effective standards-based instruction (6th ed.). Pearson.
38. Miller, D., Linn, R., & Gronlund, N. (2013). Measurement and assessment in teaching (11th ed.). Pearson Education: Upper
39. Monteiro, V., Mata, L., & Santos, N. (2021) Assessment conceptions and practices: Perspectives of primary school teachers and students. Frontiers in Education, 6, 631185. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.631185
40. National Education Inspectorate [NEI]. (2013, November). Chief inspector’s baseline report. http://www.nei.org.jm/Portals/0/Content/Documents/Chief%20Inspector's%20Report%20November%202013.pdf?ver=2015-04-08-111059-667
41. National Education Inspectorate [NEI]. (2014, June). Chief inspector’s baseline report. http://www.nei.org.jm/Portals/0/Content/Documents/Chief%20Inspector's%20Report-%20June%202014%20Final.pdf
42. National Education Inspectorate [NEI]. (2015, September). Chief inspector’s baseline report. http://www.nei.org.jm/Portals/0/Chief%20Inspector's%20Baseline%20Report%202015.pdf?ver=2015-09-30-125548-787
43. National Education Inspectorate [NEI] (2016). Chief inspector’s report. http://www.nei.org.jm/Portals/0/Content/Documents/C2R1%20Chief%20Inspector's%20Report%202016%20Final.pdf?ver=2018-04-19-115528-887
44. National Education Inspectorate [NEI] (2017). Chief inspector’s report. https://www.nei.org.jm/Portals/0/Content/Documents/Chief%20Inspector's%20Report%202017.pdf?ver=2018-11-30-102446-537&ver=2018-11-30-102446-537
45. Oluwatayo, J.A. (2012). Validity and reliability issues in educational research. Journal of educational and social research, 2(2), 391–400.
46. Ong, S.L. (n.d.). Profiling Classroom Teachers Assessment Practice. Retrieved from www.iaea.info/documents/paper_4d32f2cd.pdf
47. Onyefulu, C. (2018). Assessment practices of teachers in selected primary and secondary schools in Jamaica. Open Access Library Journal, 5(12), 1 25. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1105038
48. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2019). OECD reviews of evaluation and assessment in education: Student assessment in Turkey. Retrieved from https://www.oecdilibrary.org/sites/1807effcen/index.html?itemId=/content/component/1807effc-en
49. Popham, J.W. (2005). Classroom assessment: What teachers need to know. Pearson Education.
50. Popham, J.W. (2018). Assessment literacy for educators in a hurry. Alexandria. ASCD.
51. Saefurrohman. (2017). Indonesian EFL teachers’ classroom assessment methods in reading. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (ASSEHR), 109. 4th Asia Pacific Education Conference. https://doi.org/10.2991/aecon-17.2017.40
52. Saefurrohman, & Balinas, E. (2016). English Teachers Classroom Assessment Practices. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 5(1), 82 – 92.
53. Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Sage.
54. Sewagegn, A.A. (2019). A study on the assessment methods and experiences of teachers at an Ethiopian university. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2), 605 622. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12238a
55. Statistical Institute of Jamaica (2017). Education Statistics. Retrieved from https://statinja.gov.jm/Demo_SocialStats/Education.aspx
56. Stiggins, R.J, & Conklin, N.F. (1992). In teachers’ hands: Investigating the practices of classroom assessment. State University of New York Press.
57. Taber, K.S. (2018). The use of cronbach's alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273-1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
58. Thomas, D.R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237 246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283748
59. Vlachou, M. (2018). Classroom assessment practices in middle school science lessons: A study among Greek science teachers. Cogent Education, 5(1), Article: 1455633. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1455633
60. Williams-McBean, C. (2021). Contextual considerations: Revision of the Wiliam and Thompson (2007) formative assessment framework in the Jamaican context. The Qualitative Report, 26(9), 2943-2969. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2021.4800
61. Wren, D., & Gareis, C.R. (2019). Assessing deeper learning: Developing, implementing, and scoring performance tasks. Rowman & Littlefield.
62. Yin, R.K. (2014). Case study research design and methods (5th ed.). Sage.
63. Zhang, Z., & Burry-Stock, J.A. (2003). Classroom assessment practices and teachers’ self-perceived assessment skills. Applied Measurement in Education, 16(4), 323–342.
64. Zohrabi, M. (2013). Mixed method research: Instruments, validity, reliability and reporting the findings. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(2), 254 263. http://dx.doi.org/10.4304/tpls.3.2.254-262