Barriers and Facilitators of Educational Sustainability: Metaphorical Perceptions and Views of Teachers

Abstract

UNESCO underlines that it should be known that educational sustainability is an integral part of education that requires participatory teaching and learning methods that motivate and empower learners to change their behaviours and act for sustainable development for lifelong learning to provide a quality system. This study aimed to reveal metaphors, barriers, and facilitators on educational sustainability based on the teachers’ views. For this aim, the study was designed with a phenomenology pattern. The study group was selected through purposeful criterion sampling and consisted of teachers. For collecting data, a semi-structured interview was used. The findings showed that (a) educational sustainability was perceived metaphorically as continuity, order, executive action, resilience, goal orientation, (b) education policies, stakeholders, management style, environment, and change were barriers to educational sustainability; (c) education system, improvement of administrative processes, building a future-oriented structure, increasing quality, breaking the influence of politics in education, following the developments and considering common values should be carried out to eliminate these barriers; (d) educational policies, creating opportunities and administrative actions were both facilitators and practices to increase these facilitators for educational sustainability.

Keywords

• Barrier
• Educational sustainability
• Facilitator
• Metaphor
• Sustainable development

References

1. Akins, E., Giddens, E., Glassmeyer, D., Gruss, A., Kalamas Hedden, M., Slinger-Friedman, V., & Weand, M. (2019). Sustainability education and organizational change: A critical case study of barriers and change drivers at a higher education institution. Sustainability, 11(2), 501. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020501
2. Barriball, K. L., & While, A. (1994). Collecting data using a semi-structured interview: a discussion paper. Journal of Advanced Nursing-Institutional Subscription, 19(2), 328-335. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.1994.tb01088.x
3. Burbules, N. C., Fan, G., & Repp, P. (2020). Five Trends of education and technology in a sustainable future. Geography and Sustainability, 1, 93-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geosus.2020.05.001
4. Coblentz, J. B. (2002). Organizational Sustainability: The three aspects that matter. ERNWCA’ s First Strategy Session, Dakar.
5. Davies, B. (2007). Developing sustainable leadership. Management in Education, 21(3), 4-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892020607079984
6. Dresner, S. (2008). The principles of sustainability. Earthscan Publication: London, UK, 1-5.
7. Etimesgut District National Education Directorate (2020). Sustainable life [sürdürülebilir yasam]. Available online: https://etimesgut.meb.gov.tr/www/surdurulebilir-yasam-icin-ekolojik-okuryazarim-2-adli-projemizin-acilis-programi/icerik/2311 (accessed on 15 September 2020).
8. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (1993). How to design and evaluate research in education (7th ed). New York: McGraw-Hill, 423-504.

9. Fullan, M. (2005). Leadership & sustainability: System thinkers in action. Corwin Press: Thousand Oaks, California, USA.
10. Gaziantep Provincial National Education Directorate (2019). Ecologic and sustainable life [ekolojik ve sürdürülebilir yaşam]. Available online: http://gazianteparge.meb.gov.tr/www/ekolojik-ve-surdurulebilir-yasam-temali-uygulamali-egitim-gerceklestirilmistir/icerik/653 (accessed on 15 September 2020).
11. Glesne, C. (2012). Introduction to qualitative research [nitel arastirmaya giris] (3rd ed) (Translators: Ersoy, A.; Yalcinoglu, P). Ankara: Ani Publishing, pp. 139-167.
12. Hargreaves, A. (2007). Sustainable leadership and development in education: Creating the future, conserving the past. European Journal of Education, 42, 223-233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2007.00294.x
13. Hargreaves, A., & Fink, D. (2006). Sustainable leadership. Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, USA, 10-42.
14. Jackson, N. (2018). Learning to sustain ourselves and the world. Available online: https://www.lifewideeducation.uk/blog/learning-to-sustain-ourselves-and-the-world (accessed on 13 September 2020).
15. Jackson, N. (2011). Learning for a complex world - A lifewide concept of learning, education and personal development. Authorhouse: Bloomington, Indiana, USA.
16. Jackson, R.L., Drummond, D.K., & Camara, S. (2007). What is qualitative research? Qualitative Research Reports in Communication, 8, 21-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/17459430701617879
17. Janis, I. L., Fadner, R. H., & Janowitz, M. (1943). The reliability of a content analysis technique. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 7(2), 293-296.
18. Joyner-Wells, J. (2006). Leadership and the sustainability of educational reform. Ph.D. Dissertation, New York University, New York, USA.
19. Kang, W. (2019). Perceived barriers to implementing education for sustainable development among Korean teachers. Sustainability, 11(9), 2532-2547.
20. Kapitulčinová, D., AtKisson, A., Perdue, J., & Will, M. (2018). Towards integrated sustainability in higher education–Mapping the use of the accelerator toolset in all dimensions of university practice. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 4367-4382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.050
21. Kayihan, K. S., & Tonuk, S. (2008). Examination of site selection and analyse subject in sustainable elementary school building design. Megaron / Yıldız Technical University Faculty of Architecture E-Journal, 3(2), 137-154.
22. Kayihan, K. S., & Tonuk, S. (2011). Elementary school buildings with the direction of sustainability awareness construction. Journal of Polytechnic, 14(2), 163-171.https://doi.org/10.2339/2011.14.2, 163-171.
23. Koybasi Semin, F. (2019). Competencies of principals in ensuring sustainable education: Teachers' views. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 8, 201-212. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v8i2.18273
24. Mayring, P. (2004). Qualitative content analysis. In A Companion to Qualitative Research (Eds. Flick, U., Kardoff, E., Steinke, I.). London: Sage Publications, 266-269.
25. Milbrath, L.W. (1995). Psychological, cultural, and informational barriers to sustainability. Journal of Social Issues, 51, 101-120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1995.tb01350.x
26. Miles, B. M., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook (2nd ed). California: Sage Publications.
27. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: a methods sourcebook (3rd ed). California: Sage Publications.
28. Ozdemir, A., & Corakci, M. (2011). Renovation of Ankara school gardens with participatory method [Ankara okul bahçelerinin katilimci yöntemle yenilenmesi]. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 41, 7-20.
29. Ozdemir, O. (2010). A new environmental education perspective: education for sustainable development. Education and Science, 32, 23-38.
30. Roberts, G.Y. (2012). An exploration of social and educational sustainability: conversations from the lived experiences of low-income and first-generation community college students. Ph.D. Dissertation, Prescott College, Arizona, USA.
31. Sezen-Gultekin, G. (2019). The mediation role of organizational resilience in the relationship between organizational myopia and organizational sustainability in higher education. Ph.D. Dissertation, Abant Izzet Baysal University, Bolu, Turkey.
32. Sezen-Gultekin, G., & Argon, T. (2020a). Examination of the relationship between organizational resilience and organizational sustainability at higher education institution. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 12, 329-343.
33. Sezen-Gultekin, G., & Argon, T. (2020b). The relationship between organizational myopia, organizational resilience and organizational sustainability at a higher education institution in Turkey: a structural equation modelling. Int. Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 7, 1470-1491.
34. Sterling, S. (2001). Sustainable education – re-visioning learning and change: 6 (Schumacher Briefings). Dartington: Green Books.
35. Toran, M. (2016). Sustainable preschools: an evaluation of early childhood education institutions. Abant Izzet Baysal Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 16, 1035-1046.
36. Turkish Presidency Strategy and Budget Office (n.d.). 11th development plan (2019-2023) [11. Kalkınma Planı (2019-2023)]. Available online: http://www.sbb.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/OnbirinciKalkinmaPlani.pdf (accessed on 15 September 2020).
37. UNESCO (2014). Shaping the future we want: UN decade of education for sustainable development (2005-2014) final report. UNESCO: Paris, France.
38. Wals, A.E., & Schwarzin, L. (2012). Fostering organizational sustainability through dialogic interaction. The Learning Organization, 19, 11-27. https://doi.org/10.1108/09696471211190338
39. Yalova Provincial National Education Directorate (2020). Sustainable learning workshops [Sürdürülebilir öğrenme atölyeleri]. Available online: http://yalova.meb.gov.tr/www/surdurulebilir-ogrenme-atolyeleri-cevrimici-ogretmen-egitimleri-egitimde-bir-adim-otesi/icerik/3488 (accessed on 15 September 2020).
40. Yildirim, A., & Simsek, H. (2003). Qualitative research methods in social sciences (3rd ed.) [Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (3. baskı)]. Ankara: Seckin Publishing.