Evaluation of The Sports Coaching Program in South Sulawesi: an Evaluative Research CIPP Model Program

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 5, 1025 - 1035, 25.09.2024

Sudirman Sudirman , Alimin Hamzah , Muhammad Imran Hasanuddin , Andi Atssam Mappanyukki

https://doi.org/10.33438/ijdshs.1504627

Öz

This research aims to obtain input about the benefits, value and usefulness of a program, as well as the effectiveness of providing coaching and training through the CIPP (contex, input, process and product) model developed by Stufflebeam. Therefore, we use cross-sectional design in this study. The object of this research is the South Sulawesi sports development program, include: availability of infrastructure, availability of human resources, organizational performance and funding sources. Variables are measured through questionnaires, observations, interviews, documents and test results. The results of implementing sports coaching are in the good category, including: (1) context aspects, the average score is 89.2%, which means that the sports coaching program is appropriate and relevant to government goals and policies, (2) aspects of input, planning programs and resources are in accordance with a score of 78.0% of the maximum score, (3) process aspects, assessment of the sports coaching process is in accordance with a score of 86.3% of the maximum score, athlete assessment a score of 86.8% of the maximum score , (4) product aspect, the achievement of athletes' abilities is considered to have increased significantly, the average initial test score is 65% while the average final test score is 84.04%, resulting in an increase in the average athlete score of 19.04%. The measurement of interest a score of 78.1% of the maximum score, while attitude a score of 80.3% of the maximum score, this means that the athlete's assessment of the implementation of sports coaching tends to be positive and good.

Anahtar Kelimeler

CIPP Model, Program Evaluation, Sports Development

Kaynakça

• Beattie, M. A., & Turner, B. A. (2022). The impact of athlete-coach fit on the athletic satisfaction of NCAA Division II college athletes. Journal for the Study of Sports and Athletes in Education, 1-17. [CrossRef]
• Budihardjo, A. (2011). Organisasi Menuju Pencapaian Kinerja Optimum Sintesis Teori Untuk Mengungkap “Kotak Hitam” Organisasi. Jakarta : Prasetiya Mulya Publishing.
• Bukari, M., Osei-Poku, P., & Kofi Howard, E. (2023). Evaluating the higher national diploma industrial art programme of tamale technical university in Ghana: Curriculum versus implementation. Cogent Education, 10(1), 1-48. [CrossRef]
• Chappelet, J.L. (2018). “Beyond Governance: The Need to Improve the Regulation of International Sport.” Sport in Society, Vol. 21, No. 5. [CrossRef]
• Fielding, R., & Turner, M. (2022). Parental evaluation of 'success' and its influence on the implementation of bilingual education programmes in Australian primary settings. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 25(9), 3171-3183. [CrossRef]
• Fraina, M., & Hodge, S. R. (2020). Mentoring relationships among athletes, coaches, and athletic administrators: A literature review. Journal for the Study of Sports and Athletes in Education, 14(2), 140-164. [CrossRef]
• Harsuki, M.A. (2003). Perkembangan Olahraga Terkini Kajian Para Pakar (dan Dra. Soewatini Elias, M.Si. (Editor) Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
• Jaffe, P. G., Crooks, C. V., Reid, M., White, J., Pugh-Markie, D., & Baker, L. (2018). Enhancing judicial skills in domestic violence cases: the development, implementation, and preliminary evaluation of a model US programme. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 40(4), 496-514. [CrossRef]
• Join M. O. (2006). Program Evaluation, Form and Approaches. Australia: Allen & Unwin. [CrossRef]
• Kirkpatrick, L. D. (2006). Implementing The Four Levels. Berret-Koehler Publisher, Inc.
• Kesmodel, U.S. (2018) “Cross-sectional studies – what are they good for?,” Acta Obstreticia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 97(4), 388-393. [PubMed]
• Potrac, P. (2016). Delivering the FA grassroots club mentor programme: Mentors’ experience of practice. In W. Allison, A. Abraham, & A. Cale (Eds.), Advances in coach education and development: From research to practice (pp. 76–86). London: Routledge.
• Sawiuk, R., Taylor, W. G., & Groom, R. (2018). Exploring formalised elite coach mentoring programmes in the UK: ‘We’ve had to play the game’. Sport, Education and Society, 23(6), 619–631. [CrossRef]
• Stufflebeam, D.L. & Shinkfield, A.J. (1985). Systematic evaluation:aself-instructional guide to theory and practice. Kluwer-Nijholf Publishing.
• Syarifuddin, Aip & Hadisasmita, Yusuf. Ilmu Kepelatihan Dasar.Jakarta : Depdikbud. Dirjen Dikti, Proyek Pendidikan Tingkat Akademik. 1996.
• Tayibnapsis, F.Y. Evaluasi Program dan Instrumen Evaluasi Jakarta: Penerbit Rineka Cipta, 2006.