Integration of Life Skills in Outdoor Education Program Towards Interpersonal Communication

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 5, 1044 - 1052, 25.09.2024

Yogi Akin , Asep Ridwan Kurniawan , Dicky Oktora Mudzakir Asep Ramdan Afriyuandi , Lili Setiawan , Aida Roha Abdul Rasid

https://doi.org/10.33438/ijdshs.1505882

Öz

The purpose of the study was to determine and test the differences in the influence of three groups, namely two groups of outdoor education programs and one group of daily activities on interpersonal communication skills. The method used in this study was an experiment with a pretest-posttest control group design with more than one experimental group and a quantitative approach. The sample involved was 42 (21 females and 21 males) who were studying in the physical education department of PGSD level one. The Life Skills Scale for Sport (LSSS) questionnaire as an instrument with a reliability level of 0.92 and a validity of 0.63. Data analysis was carried out using Statistical Product and Service Solution (SPSS) on Windows version 22. The findings of the study showed that the integrated outdoor education life skill program had an effect with a significance value of .000 <0.05, the non-integrated outdoor education program had an effect with a significance value of .026 <0.05 and daily activities had no effect with a significance value of .108> 0.05. simultaneously between the three groups there was a significant difference. The conclusion is that integrated and non-integrated life skill outdoor education programs have an effect on interpersonal communication, but the integrated life skill outdoor education program is better. While in the control group there is no significant effect.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Life Skills, Outdoor Education, Social Skill and Interpersonal Communication

Etik Beyan

1. Able to comply with applicable regulations at the University and related agencies. 2. Able to carry out a research code of ethics.

Destekleyen Kurum

Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Proje Numarası

1215/UN40.A6/KP/2024

Teşekkür

Thank You For Attention

Kaynakça

• Barker, M. (2006). Outdoor education an actual reality experience . Outdoor Education Conference, Bendigo.
• Becker, C., Lauterbach, G., Spengler, S., Dettweiler, U., & Mess, F. (2017). Effects of regular classes in outdoor education settings: A systematic review on students’ learning, social and health dimensions. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(5), 1–20. [CrossRef]
• Bosch, R., & Oswald, M. (2010). Adolescents’ perceptions of an adventure-based programme. Perspectives in Education, 28(1), 64–76.
• Christensen, L. B., Johnson, R. B., & Turner, L. A. (2014). Research Method, Design, and Analysis twelfth edition. Pearson Education Limited. Crompton, J. L., & Sellar, C. (2010). Do Outdoor Education Experiences Contribute to Positive Development in the Affective Domain ? The Journal of Environmental Education, 12(4), 21–29. [CrossRef]
• Cronin, L. D., & Allen, J. (2016). Development and Initial Validation of the Life Skills Scale for Sport. Psychology of Sport & Exercise. 105-119. [CrossRef]
• Driessnack, M., & Rhodes, A. M. (2009). Children and Nature-Deficit Disorder. Journal Compilation, 14(1), 73–75. [CrossRef]
• Ewert, A. W., & Voight, A. (2012). The Role of Adventure Education in Enhancing Health-related Variables. The International Journal of Health, Wellness, and Society, 2(1), 75–88. [CrossRef]
• Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. (2012). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
• Karjono. (2009). Pengendalian diri (self control) melalui outdoor education.
• Kathleen, B., & Larry, B. (2011). Outdoor Play and Learning: Policy and Practice. International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership, 6(8), 1–12. [CrossRef]
• Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2014). Learning to play , playing to learn A case study of a ludic learning space. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 23(1), 26–50.
• Martin, S. C. (2003). The Influence of Outdoor Schoolyard Experiences on Students ’ Environmental Knowledge , Attitudes , Behaviors , and Comfort Levels. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 15(2), 51–63. [CrossRef]
• Szczepanski, A., Malmer, K., Nelson, N., & Dahlgren, L. O. (2006). The distinctive nature and potential of outdoor education from a teacher perspective. 1–18.
• Verhaegh, J., Soute, I., Kessels, A., & Markopoulos, P. (2006). On the design of Camelot, an outdoor game for children. Proceeding of the 2006 Conference on Interaction Design and Children, IDC ’06, 9–1. [CrossRef]