REVIEW OF CARBON FOOTPRINT STRATEGIES

Kemal Atmaca; Ayşe Yeter Günal

REVIEW OF CARBON FOOTPRINT STRATEGIES

Abstract

The knowledge of carbon footprint is essential to discussions about sustainability and environmental concern. The need for industries, governments, and individuals to estimate and lesser their carbon footprints is growing on account of the deteriorating effects of climate change. This page proposals a thorough summary of current studies on the idea of carbon footprints, their effects on the environment, gauging techniques, and measures for dropping them. A carbon footprint is an vital pointer that shows the quantity of carbon dioxide (CO₂) and other greenhouse gas releases that come from normal human actions. As the properties of climate change and global warming become further seeming, there is growing demand on persons, businesses, and governments to identify and decrease their carbon footprints. Carbon footprints are inclined by a number of variables, including waste managing, transportation, food intake, and energy usage. Examined are remedies such spherical economy ideologies, maintainable transportation, energy productivity, and the consumption of renewable energy. To sum up, dropping carbon footprints is critical to the fight against climate change. Working organized at the institutional, social, and individual levels is important to accomplishing a sustainable future.

Keywords

References

[1] Joachim Schleich, Elisabeth Dütschke, Elke Kanberger, Andreas Ziegler, (2024). On the relationship between individual carbon literacy and carbon footprint components, Ecological Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.108100.
[2] Marinko Skare, Beata Gavurova, Malgorzata Porada-Rochon, (2024). Digitalization and carbon footprint: Building a path to a sustainable economic growth, Technological Forecasting & Social Change. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123045.
[3] David Castañeda, Guido Silva, Jorge Salirrosas, Suyeon Kim, Bruno Bertolotti, Javier Nakamatsu, Rafael Aguilara, (2020). Production of a lightweight masonry block using alkaline activated natural pozzolana and natural fibers, Construction and Building Materials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119143
[4] Shaoqing Shi, Jianhua Yin, (2021). Global research on carbon footprint: A scientometric review, Environmental Impact Assessment Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106571
[5] Fabien Delhomme, Elodie Prud’homme, Clara Julliot, Tina Guillot, Sofiane Amziane, Sandrine Marceau, (2022). Effect of hemp on cement hydration: Experimental characterization of the interfacial transition zone, Results in Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rechem.2022.100440
[6] Hagar Hammad, Yasmin Elhakim, Yara Hossam, Mohamed Mahmoud, Tawfik Ismail & Irene S. Fahim, (2023). A proposed framework for measuring direct and indirect carbon emissions in the operational phase of a construction project: a case study, International Journal of Sustainable Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1080/19397038.2023.2254977
[7] AndreasWagner, DeniseFischer-Kreer, (2023). The role of CEO regulatory focus in increasing or reducing corporate carbon emissions, Business Strategy and the Environment. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3517
[8] Víctor Cloquell Ballester, Vanesa G. Lo-Iacono-Ferreira, Miguel Ángel Artacho-Ramírez, and Salvador F.Capuz-Rizo, (2020). The Carbon Footprint of Valencia Port: A Case Study of the Port Authority of Valencia (Spain), International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. doi:10.3390/ijerph17218157

[9] Adem Atmaca, Nihat Atmaca, (2022). Carbon footprint assessment of residential buildings, a review and a case study in Turkey. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130691
[10] Aguerata Kaboré, Wahid Maref and Claudiane M. Ouellet-Plamondon, (2024). Hygrothermal performance of the hemp concrete building envelope. Energies. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17071740
[11] Tarun Jami, Deepak Rawtani and Yadendra K. Agrawal, (2016). Hemp concrete: carbon negative construction. ICE. https://doi.org/10.1680/jemmr.16.00122
[12] Fei Lun, Moucheng Liu, Dan Zhang, Dan Zhang and Junguo Liu, (2016). Life cycle analysis of carbon flow and carbon footprint of harvested wood products of larix principis-rupprechtii in China. Sustainability. doi:10.3390/su8030247
[13] Luqian Weng, Hailin Cао, Krivenko P.V., Yue Guo, Petropavlovsky O.N., Pushkar V.I. and Kovalchuk A.Yu., (2014). Modeling a thermo-stressed state of the cast-in-situ low carbon footprint alkali activated slag cement concrete hardened under hot environment. Applied Mechanics and Materials Vol 525 (2014) pp 482-490. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.525.482
[14] Xiang Zhao, Enshen Long and Luhong Huang, (2011). Design measures of low carbon buildings with exterior envelope made of ETFE air pillows. Advanced Materials Research Vols. 168-170 (2011) pp 2524-2528. doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.168-170.2524
[15] Adem Atmaca, Nihat Atmaca, (2015). Life cycle energy (LCEA) and carbon dioxide emissions (LCCO2A) assessment of two residential buildings in Gaziantep, Turkey, Energy and Buildings. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.06.008
[16] C.K. Chau, T.M. Leung, W.Y. Ng, (2015). A review on Life Cycle Assessment, Life Cycle Energy Assessment and Life Cycle Carbon Emissions Assessment on buildings, Applied Energy. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.023
[17] R.H. Crawford, (2008). Validation of a hybrid life-cycle inventory analysis method, J. Environ. Manage. 88 (3) 496–506.
[18] G.J. Treloar, (1997). Extracting embodied energy paths from input–output tables: towards an input–output-based hybrid energy analysis method, Econ. Syst. Res. 9 (4) 375–391.
[19] R.H. Crawford, G.J. Treloar, R.J. Fuller, M. Bazilian, (2006). Life-cycle energy analysis of building integrated photovoltaic systems (BiPVs) with heat recovery unit, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 10 (6) 559–575.
[20] Kemal Atmaca, (2024). The effects of seismic isolators on RC building's earthquake performance, life cycle energy consumption and carbon footprint. MSc Thesis in Gaziantep University.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Civil Construction Engineering

Journal Section

Review

Authors

Kemal Atmaca ^*
0000-0002-6196-6146
Türkiye

Ayşe Yeter Günal
0000-0002-4866-2914
Türkiye

Publication Date

December 31, 2024

Submission Date

December 15, 2024

Acceptance Date

December 31, 2024

Published in Issue

Year 2024 Volume: 9 Number: 2

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA24WT44KS

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Atmaca, K., & Günal, A. Y. (2024). REVIEW OF CARBON FOOTPRINT STRATEGIES. The International Journal of Energy and Engineering Sciences, 9(2), 128-148. https://izlik.org/JA24WT44KS

AMA

1.Atmaca K, Günal AY. REVIEW OF CARBON FOOTPRINT STRATEGIES. IJEES. 2024;9(2):128-148. https://izlik.org/JA24WT44KS

Chicago

Atmaca, Kemal, and Ayşe Yeter Günal. 2024. “REVIEW OF CARBON FOOTPRINT STRATEGIES”. The International Journal of Energy and Engineering Sciences 9 (2): 128-48. https://izlik.org/JA24WT44KS.

EndNote

Atmaca K, Günal AY (December 1, 2024) REVIEW OF CARBON FOOTPRINT STRATEGIES. The International Journal of Energy and Engineering Sciences 9 2 128–148.

IEEE

[1]K. Atmaca and A. Y. Günal, “REVIEW OF CARBON FOOTPRINT STRATEGIES”, IJEES, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 128–148, Dec. 2024, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA24WT44KS

ISNAD

Atmaca, Kemal - Günal, Ayşe Yeter. “REVIEW OF CARBON FOOTPRINT STRATEGIES”. The International Journal of Energy and Engineering Sciences 9/2 (December 1, 2024): 128-148. https://izlik.org/JA24WT44KS.

JAMA

1.Atmaca K, Günal AY. REVIEW OF CARBON FOOTPRINT STRATEGIES. IJEES. 2024;9:128–148.

MLA

Atmaca, Kemal, and Ayşe Yeter Günal. “REVIEW OF CARBON FOOTPRINT STRATEGIES”. The International Journal of Energy and Engineering Sciences, vol. 9, no. 2, Dec. 2024, pp. 128-4, https://izlik.org/JA24WT44KS.

Vancouver

1.Kemal Atmaca, Ayşe Yeter Günal. REVIEW OF CARBON FOOTPRINT STRATEGIES. IJEES [Internet]. 2024 Dec. 1;9(2):128-4. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA24WT44KS