Examining the Relationship Between School Engagement and Learning Responsibility in Middle School Students

Abstract

This study aims to examine the relationship between middle school students' levels of school engagement and their learning responsibilities. The correlational study was conducted, which is one of the quantitative research models. The study sample consisted of 353 middle school students in İstanbul, Üsküdar selected through simple random sampling, one of the probability sampling methods. The data collection tools used in the study were a personal information form, School Engagement Scale, and Learning Responsibility Scale. Independent samples t-test, ANOVA, correlation, and multiple linear regression techniques were used in the analysis of the collected data. In the study, it was found that both school engagement and learning responsibility levels of female students were significantly higher. When examining students' learning responsibility, it was found that seventhgrade students and students attending public schools had significantly higher levels of learning responsibility than other students. When examining the predictive power of school engagement on learning responsibility, it was found that school engagement predicted learning responsibility by 62%. Based on these results, it is thought that providing an educational environment in which children feel engaged will also increase their learning responsibilities.

Keywords

• School Engagement
• Learning Responsibility
• Middle School Students

References

1. Ackert, E. (2018). Segregation paradox? school racial/ethnic and socioeconomic composition and racial/ethnic differences in engagement. Social Science Research, 70, 144-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2017.10.010.
2. Allan, G. M. (2006). Responsibility for learning: students’ understandings and their self-reported learning attitudes and behaviours [Master’s Thesis, Queensland University of Technology Faculty of Education]. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/16209/1/Gary_Allan_Thesis.pdf.
3. Alp, İ. (2017). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin bireysel değerleri ile okul kültürüne ilişkin algılarının incelenmesi (Inspections of the perceptions of the secondary school students pertaining to school culture with their individual values). (Thesis No: 490643) [Master’s Thesis, Marmara University]. Turkish Council of Higher Education Theses Center.
4. Amerstorfer, C. M., & Freiin von Münster-Kistner, C. (2021). Student Perceptions of Academic Engagement and Student-Teacher Relationships in Problem-Based Learning. Frontiers in psychology, 12, 713057. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.713057.
5. Arastaman, G. (2009). Lise birinci sınıf öğrencilerinin okula bağlılık (school engagement) durumlarına ilişkin öğrenci, öğretmen ve yöneticilerin görüşleri (Students’, teachers’ and administrators’ opinions about freshman high school students’ engagement). Pamukkale University Journal of Education, 26, 102-112.
6. Aydın, R. (2018). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin okul aidiyeti ile okul memnuniyeti arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi (Investigation of the relationship between middle school students' school belongingness and school satisfaction). (Thesis No: 502421) [Master’s Thesis, İstanbul University]. Turkish Council of Higher Education Theses Center.
7. Ayish, N., & Deveci, T. (2019). Student perceptions of responsibility for their own learning and for supporting peers’ learning in a project-based learning environment. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 31(2), 224-237.
8. Bacon, C. S. (1993). Student responsibility for learning. Adolescence, 28(109), 199.

9. Barlow, A. J. & Brown, S. (2020). Correlations between modes of student cognitive engagement and instructional practices in undergraduate stem courses. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00214-7.
10. Barlow, A. J., Brown, S., Lutz, B. D., Pitterson, N. P., Hunsu, N. J., & Adesope, O. (2020). Development of the student course cognitive engagement instrument (sccei) for college engineering courses. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00220-9.
11. Başbay, A. (2008). Öğrenenlerin bireysel öğrenme görevleri ile zihinsel becerileri ve bilişsel faaliyet hızları arasındaki ilişki (Relationship between learners' individual learning tasks and their mental skills and decision making pace). Education and Science, 33(49), 3-17.
12. Boubih, S., Assimi, E., El Qryefy, M., Seghir, H., Ghariz, G., Boucetta, N., & Janati-İdrissi, R. (2023). Factors influencing learner engagement: A case study of middle and high school students. International Journal of Science Didactics and Educational Engineering, 1(1), 56-70. https://journals.imist.ma/index.php/IJSDEE/article/view/887/607.
13. Boud, D. (1988). Introduction to the second edition. In D. Boud (Ed), Developing student autonomy in learning (pp. 7-16). Kogan Page.
14. Brooks, J.G., & Brooks, M.G. (2006). In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
15. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç-Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2008). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (Scientific research methods). Pegem Publication.
16. Carpenter, J. P., & Pease, J. S. (2013). Preparing students to take responsibility for learning: The role of non-curricular learning strategies. Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 7(2), 38-55. https://doi.org/10.3776/joci.2013.v7n2p38-55.
17. Clayton, J. (2003). Assessing and researching the online learning environment. In M. Khine & D. Fisher (Eds). Technology-rich learning environments: a future perspective (pp. 157- 186). World Scientific.
18. Cook-Sather, A., & Luz, A. (2015). Greater engagement in and responsibility for learning: What happens when students cross the threshold of student– faculty partnership. Higher Education Research and Development, 34(6), 1097-1109.
19. Çam, Ş. S., & Ünal-Oruç, E. (2014). Öğrenme sorumluluğu ve güç dengesi (Learning responsibility and balance of power). International Journal of Instruction, 7(1), 5-16.
20. Çengel, M., Totan, T., & Çöğmen, S. (2017). Okula bağlılık ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlanması (Turkish adaptation of school engagement scale). Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal University Journal of Faculty of Education, 17(4), 1820-1837. https://doi.org/10.17240/aibuefd.2017.17.32772-363966.
21. Çevik, S. (2005). Özel okul ve kamu okullarının spora ayırdıkları finansman ve sportif başarılarının karşılaştırılması (İstanbul ili ortaöğretim okulları örneği) (The comparison of the fund private and public schools allocate for sports activities and their success in sports (sample for the secondary schools in İstanbul) (Thesis No: 164089) [Master’s Thesis, İstanbul University]. Turkish Council of Higher Education Theses Center.
22. Dang, H., & Rogers, F. (2008). The growing phenomenon of private tutoring: does it deepen human capital, widen inequalities, or waste resources? The World Bank Research Observer, 23(2), 161-200. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkn004.
23. Devlin, M. (2002). Taking responsibility for learning isn’t everything: a case for developing tertiary students’ conceptions of learning. Teaching in Higher Education, 7(2), 125-138.
24. DeMonbrun, M., Finelli, C. J., Prince, M. J., Borrego, M., Shekhar, P., Henderson, C., … & Waters, C. (2017). Creating an instrument to measure student response to instructional practices. Journal of Engineering Education, 106(2), 273-298. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20162.
25. Dinçer, S. (2014). Eğitim bilimlerinde uygulamalı meta-analiz. Pegem Akademi.
26. Discenza, R., Howard, C., & Schenk, K. (2002). The design and management of effective distance learning programs. Idea Group Publishing.
27. Dönmez, Ş. (2016). Ortaokul öğrencilerinde okul iklimi, okula bağlılık ve okul yaşam kalitesi algısının çeşitli değişkenler açısından incelenmesi (The examining school climate, school engagement and quality of school life perception in middle school students in terms of various variables). (Thesis No: 448384) [Master’s Thesis, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University]. Turkish Council of Higher Education Theses Center.
28. Er, B. H. (2021). Ergenlik döneminde ailenin akademik tutumunun başarıya etkisinde öğrenme sorumluluğunun aracılık etkisi (Intermediate effect of learning responsibility on the effect of academic attitude on success in adolescence) (Thesis No: 701362). [Master’s Thesis, İstanbul Aydın University]. Turkish Council of Higher Education Theses Center.
29. Erişti, B. (2017). Öğrenme sorumluluğu ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi (Development of a learning responsibility scale). Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(1), 481-503. https://doi.org/10.17522/balikesirnef.356578.
30. Estévez, I., Rodríguez-Llorente, C., Piñeiro, I., González-Suárez, R., & Arias, A. V. (2021). School engagement, academic achievement, and self-regulated learning. Sustainability, 13(6), 3011. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063011.
31. Felder, R.M., & Brent, R. (2009). Active learning: An introduction. ASQ Higher Education Brief, 2, 4-9.
32. Finn, J. D., & Voelkl, K. E. (1993). School characteristics related to school engagement. Journal of Negro Education, 62, 249–268. https://doi.org/10.2307/2295464.
33. Fredricks, J. A., & Blumenfeld, P. C. Ve Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59- 109.
34. George, D., & Mallery, P. (2010). SPSS for Windows step by step. A simple study guide and reference. Pearson Education, Inc.
35. Golzar, F. A. (2006). İlköğretim 5. sınıf öğrencilerine yönelik sorumluluk ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi ve sorumluluk düzeylerinin cinsiyet denetim odağı ve akademik başarıya göre incelenmesi (Development of a responsibility scale for 5th grade elementary students and investigating the relationship of responsibility and gender, locus of control, and academic achievement). (Thesis No: 174902) [Master’s Thesis, Hacettepe University]. Turkish Council of Higher Education Theses Center.
36. Gökdağ-Baltaoğlu, M. & Güven, M. (2022). Views of prospective teachers on learning responsibility. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 7(1), 228-239. https://doi.org/10.33200/ijcer.669055.
37. Griffin, C. B., Stitt, R. L., & Henderson, D. X. (2020). Investigating school racial climate and private racial regard as risk and protector factors for black high school students’ school engagement. Journal of Black Psychology, 46(6-7), 514-549. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095798420946895.
38. Güngör, C. (2021). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin LGS hazirlik sürecine ilişkin ebeveyn görüşlerinin incelenmesi. Eğitim ve İnsani Bilimler Dergisi: Teori Ve Uygulama, 12(23), 171-200.
39. Hill, J. R. (2002). Overcoming obstacles and creating connections: community building in webbased learning environments. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 14(1), 67–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02940951.
40. Hospel, V. & Galand, B. (2016). Are both classroom autonomy support and structure equally important for students' engagement? a multilevel analysis. Learning and Instruction, 41, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.09.001.
41. Istiqomah, N., Yunikawati, N. A., & Irwansyah, M. R. (2021). Self-managed learning in online learning. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Innovative Research Across Disciplines (ICIRAD 2021). https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211222.022.
42. Jenkins, P. H. (1997). School delinquency and school commitment. Sociology of Education, 221-239. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427897034003003.
43. Jiang, M., Gao, K., Wu, Z., & Guo, P. (2022). The influence of academic pressure on adolescents’ problem behavior: chain mediating effects of self-control, parent–child conflict, and subjective well-being. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.954330.
44. Jimerson, S. R., Campos, E., & Greif, J. L. (2003). Toward an understanding of definitions and measures of school engagement and related terms. The California School Psychologist, 8(1), 7-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03340893.
45. Kahraman, N. (2014). Öğrenci katılımı ve TIMSS 2011 fen başarısı arasındaki ilişkinin sınıflara göre karşılaştırılması (Cross-grade comparison of relationship between students’ engagement and TIMSS 2011 science achievement). Education and Science, 39(172), 95-107.
46. Kalaycı, H., & Özdemir, M. (2013). Lise öğrencilerinin okul yaşamının niteliğine ilişkin algılarının okul bağlılıkları üzerine etkisi (The influence of students’ perceptions toward quality of school life on their school engagement). Gazi University Journal of Gazi Education Faculty, 33(2): 293-315.
47. Kandemir, M. (2014). Akademik ertelemenin yordayıcıları: Sorumluluk, başarı / başarısızlığa yönelik yükleme stilleri ve akademik özyeterlik inançları (The predictors of academic procrastination: responsibility, attributional styles regarding success / failure, and beliefs in academic self-efficacy). Education and Science, 39(171), 99-114.
48. Karababa, A., Oral, T., & Dilmaç, B. (2018). Ortaokul öğrencilerinde okula bağlılığın yordanmasında algılanan sosyal destek ve değerin rolü (The role of perceived social support and value in prediction of school attachment among secondary school students). Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 33(2), 269-279.
49. Karasar, N. (2012). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi (Scientific research methods). Nobel Publication. Kaya, M., & Doğan, U. (2014). Öğrenci sorumluluk: Ölçek geliştirme, güvenirlik ve geçerlik çalışması (Student responsibility: The study of scale development, reliability and validity). Journal of European Education, 4(1), 11-18.
50. Kitsantas, A., & Zimmerman, B.J. (2009). College students' homework and academic achievement: The mediating role of self-regulatory beliefs. Metacognition and Learning, 4(2), 1556-1623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-008-9028-y.
51. Kivikangas, J. M., Kätsyri, J., Järvelä, S., & Ravaja, N. (2014). Gender differences in emotional responses to cooperative and competitive game play. PloS One, 9(7), e100318. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0100318.
52. Kolan, H. İ. (2020). Lise öğrencilerinin problemli internet kullanımının öğrenme sorumluluğunu yordama gücü (The predictive power of problematic internet use on learning responsibility of high school students). (Thesis No: 637910). [Master’s Thesis, Adnan Menderes University]. Turkish Council of Higher Education Theses Center.
53. Kusmaryono, I. and Wijayanti, D. (2023). Exploration of students’ mathematics learning experiences and engagement outside the classroom. International Journal of Education, 16(2), 75-84. https://doi.org/10.17509/ije.v16i2.48399.
54. Lau, C., Kitsantas, A., & Miller, A.D. (2018). Perceived responsibility for learning, self-efficacy, and sources of self-efficacy in mathematics: A study of international baccalaureate primary years programme students. Social Psychological Education, 21, 603–620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-018-9431-4.
55. Larasaty, G. and Yulianawati, I. (2019). The contribution of creative writing activity toward student’s engagement in poetry class. Wiralodra English Journal, 3(2), 344-354. https://doi.org/10.31943/wej.v3i2.66.
56. Larson, K. E., Pas, E. T., Bottiani, J. H., Kush, J. M., & Bradshaw, C. P. (2020). A multidimensional and multilevel examination of student engagement and secondary school teachers’ use of classroom management practices. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 23(3), 149-162. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300720929352.
57. Lee, V. E., & Smith, J. B. (2001). High school restructuring and student achievement. Teachers College Press.
58. Li, Y., & Lerner, R. M. (2011). Trajectories of school engagement during adolescence: implications for grades, depression, delinquency, and substance use. Developmental Psychology, 47(1), 233-247. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021307.
59. Lodge, C. (2007). Engaging student voice to improve pedagogy and learning: an exploration of examples of innovative pedagogical approaches for school improvement. International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, 4(5), 4-19. https://doi.org/10.5172/ijpl.4.5.4.
60. Lombardi, E., Traficante, D., Bettoni, R., Offredi, I., Giorgetti, M., & Vernice, M. (2019). The impact of school climate on well-being experience and school engagement: a study with high-school students. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02482.
61. ,Luo, Y., Xie, M., & Lian, Z. (2019). Emotional engagement and student satisfaction: a study of chinese college students based on a nationally representative sample. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 28(4), 283-292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-019-00437-5.
62. Lu, G., Xie, K., & Liu, Q. (2022). What influences student situational engagement in smart classrooms: perception of the learning environment and students' motivation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(6), 1665-1687. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13204.
63. Macintyre, T., Chaves, M., Monroy, T., Zethelius, M., Villarreal, T., Tassone, V., … & Wals, A. (2020). Transgressing boundaries between community learning and higher education: levers and barriers. Sustainability, 12(7), 2601. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072601.
64. Malone, M., Cornell, D. G., & Shukla, K. (2019). Grade configuration is associated with school-level standardized test pass rates for sixth-, seventh-, and eighth-grade students. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 31(2), 289-305. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2019.1654526.
65. Markus, S., Rieser, S., & Schwab, S. (2022). The gender-specific role of social relationships for school well-being in primary school. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie, 230(3), 215-228. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000500.
66. McCombs, B. L. (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: A phenomenological view. In B.J. Zimmerman, & D.H. Schunk (Eds), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice (pp.51-82). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
67. Mikami, A. Y., Ruzek, E., Hafen, C. A., Gregory, A., & Allen, J. P. (2017). Perceptions of relatedness with classroom peers promote adolescents’ behavioral engagement and achievement in secondary school. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46(11), 2341-2354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0724-2.
68. Musso, P., Ligorio, M. B., Ibe, E., Annese, S., Semeraro, C., & Cassibba, R. (2022). Stem-gender stereotypes: associations with school empowerment and school engagement among italian and nigerian adolescents. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.879178.
69. Naibert, N. and Barbera, J. (2022). Development and evaluation of a survey to measure student engagement at the activity level in general chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 99(3), 1410-1419. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c01145.
70. Okur, S., Danacı, F. N., & Totan, T. (2022). The moderation role of social and emotional learning on the effect of school engagement on motivation. Humanistic Perspective, 4(2), 334-352. https://doi.org/10.47793/hp.1113429.
71. Özen, Y. (2013). Sorumluluk duygusu ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi; geçerlik ve güvenirliği (Sense of responsibility scale development, validity and reliability). Journal of European Education, 3(2), 17-23.
72. Parra-Pérez, L. G., Valdés-Cuervo, A. A., Urías-Murrieta, M., Addo, R., Cota-Valenzuela, L. V., & García-Vázquez, F. I. (2023). Development and psychometric evidence of the academic engagement scale (usaes) in mexican college students. Plos One, 18(12), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288012.
73. Pöysä, S., Vasalampi, K., Muotka, J., Lerkkanen, M., Poikkeus, A., & Nurmi, J. (2018). Teacher–student interaction and lower secondary school students’ situational engagement. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(2), 374-392. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12244
74. Pyne, J. (2020). Gender test score gaps under equal behavioral engagement. Educational Researcher, 49(6), 459-464. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x20930203.
75. Reilly, D., Neumann, D. L., & Andrews, G. (2017). Investigating gender differences in mathematics and science: results from the 2011 trends in mathematics and science survey. Research in Science Education, 49(1), 25-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9630-6.
76. Rimm‐Kaufman, S. E., Baroody, A. E., Larsen, R., Curby, T. W., & Abry, T. (2015). To what extent do teacher–student interaction quality and student gender contribute to fifth graders’ engagement in mathematics learning?. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(1), 170-185. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037252.
77. Roper, A.R. (2007). How students develop online learning skills. Educause Quarterly, 30(1), 62–64. https://er.educause.edu/-/media/files/article-downloads/eqm07110.pdf.
78. Rudasill, K. M., Reio, T. G., Jr, Stipanovic, N., & Taylor, J. E. (2010). A longitudinal study of student-teacher relationship quality, difficult temperament, and risky behavior from childhood to early adolescence. Journal of School Psychology, 48(5), 389–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2010.05.001.
79. Sartika, R., Maftuh, B., Nurdin, E. S., & Budimansyah, D. (2024). Strengthening students' responsible character through civic education learning: an action research in indonesia. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23(3), 428-447. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.3.21.
80. Savi, F. (2011). School attachment scale for children and adolescents: the study of validity and reliability. Elementary Education Online, 10(1), 80-90.
81. Savin-Baden, M., & Major, C.H. (2004). Foundations of problem-based learning. Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
82. Schlechty, P.C. (2001). Shaking up the school house: How to support and sustain educational innovation. Jossey-Bass Wiley Imprint.
83. Shavelson, R. J., & Huang, L. (2003). Responding responsibly to the frenzy to assess learning in higher education. Change, 35(1), 10–19.
84. Sierra, J. J. (2009). Shared responsibility and student learning: ensuring a favorable educational experience. Journal of Marketing Education, 32, 104-111. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475309344802.
85. Simons-Morton, B.G., & Crump, A. D. (2003). The association of parental involvement and social competence with school adjustment and engagement among sixth graders. Journal of School Health, 73(3), 121-126. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2003.tb03586.x.
86. Steenberghs, N., Lavrijsen, J., Soenens, B., & Verschueren, K. (2021). Peer effects on engagement and disengagement: differential contributions from friends, popular peers, and the entire class. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.726815.
87. Upadyaya, K. and Salmela‐Aro, K. (2013). Development of school engagement in association with academic success and well-being in varying social contexts. European Psychologist, 18(2), 136-147. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000143.
88. Vidić, T. (2021). Students’ school satisfaction: the role of classroom climate, self-efficacy, and engagement. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 9(3), 347-357. https://doi.org/10.23947/2334-8496-2021-9-3-347-357.
89. Wang, M., & Eccles, J. S. (2012). Social support matters: longitudinal effects of social support on three dimensions of school engagement from middle to high school. Child Development, 83(3), 877-895. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01745.x.
90. Warren, R.G. (1996). Carpe diem: A student guide to active learning. University Press of America, Lanham.
91. Weiss, C. C., & Baker‐Smith, E. C. (2010). Eighth-grade school form and resilience in the transition to high school: a comparison of middle schools and k-8 schools. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 20(4), 825-839. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00664.x.
92. Wicaksono, A. L., Anam, S., Retnaningdyah, P., & Setiawan, S. (2022). Grice maxims breaking in the teacher and students’ online interaction. Pioneer: Journal of Language and Literature, 14(1), 101-119. https://doi.org/10.36841/pioneer.v14i1.1658.
93. Yakar, A. (2017). Potansiyel gelişim alanı bağlamında bir eylem araştırması: öğrenme sorumluluğu, motivasyon ve başarı (An action research in the context of zone of proximal development: Learning responsibility, motivation and achievement). (Thesis No: 488697) [Master’s Thesis, Adnan Menderes University]. Turkish Council of Higher Education Theses Center.
94. Yekta, R. R. and Alighadr, N. (2016). An analysis of engaged learning in low stakes and high-stakes assessment contexts in distance education: a case of english for specific purposes tests. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 6(3), 203-211. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.1/2016.6.3/1.3.203.211.
95. Yeşil, R. (2013). School learning responsibility scale’s validity and reliability study (for primary school students). Mevlâna International Journal of Education, 3(4), 1-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.13054/mije.13.40.3.4.
96. Zimmerman, B. J., & Kitsantas, A. (2005). The hidden dimension of personal competence: Self-regulated learning and practice. In A.J. Elliot & C.S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 204–222). Guilford Press.