Design and Optimization of a Solar PTC-Based Cogeneration System for Sustainable Power and Freshwater Generation in Basrah

Abstract

Water scarcity and rising energy demand in arid regions such as Basrah, Iraq, necessitate the development of highly efficient and environmentally responsible cogeneration systems. This study aims to design and optimize a solar-assisted power–water cogeneration system tailored to Basrah’s climatic and resource constraints. The proposed system integrates a Gas Turbine (GT) and Parabolic Trough Collector (PTC) solar field with a hybrid Multi-Effect Distillation (MED) and Reverse Osmosis (RO) desalination unit. A comprehensive 4E analysis (Energy, Exergy, Exergoeconomic, and Exergoenvironmental) is conducted to evaluate system performance. Thermodynamic modeling is performed using Thermoflex, and a Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm (NSGA-III) implemented in MATLAB is employed to optimize key decision variables with the objectives of maximizing exergetic efficiency and minimizing total cost and environmental impacts. The optimized configuration increases exergetic efficiency from 47.31% to 60.12%, reduces total cost by 6.58%, and lowers environmental emissions by 4.27%. Furthermore, freshwater production rises from 120.10 to 142.87 kg/s, representing an 18.96% improvement. The novelty of this work lies in the integrated configuration coupling solar-assisted gas power with hybrid thermal-membrane desalination, specifically adapted to Basrah’s conditions. Combined with a full 4E assessment and advanced multi-objective optimization, this study bridges the gap between theoretical modeling and practical deployment in southern Iraq, demonstrating a technically viable and sustainable pathway for addressing the region’s critical water–energy nexus.

Keywords

• Combined Heat and Power; Solar PTC
• Gas Turbine
• MED
• RO.

References

1. M. Mason, “Infrastructure under pressure: Water management and state-making in southern Iraq,” Geoforum, vol. 132, pp. 52–61, June 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2022.04.006.
2. O. Bait, “A critical review on triangular pyramid, weir–type, spherical, and hemispherical solar water distiller conceptions,” Solar Energy, vol. 269, Feb. 2024, Art no. 112322, doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2024.112322.
3. N. Al-ansari, “Water Resources in Iraq: Perspectives and Prognosis,” Journal of Water Resources and Geosciences, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 249–266, 2025, Accessed: Oct. 22, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://jwrg.gov.iq/index.php/jwrg/article/view/136.
4. T. Altmann, J. Robert, A. Bouma, J. Swaminathan, and J. H. Lienhard, “Primary energy and exergy of desalination technologies in a power-water cogeneration scheme,” Applied Energy, vol. 252, Oct. 2019, Art no. 113319, doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113319.
5. R. López-Zavala et al., “Absorption cooling and desalination system with a novel internal energetic and mass integration that increases capacity and efficiency,” Desalination, vol. 471, 2019, Art no. 114144, doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2019.114144.
6. Z. Dong, M. Liu, X. Huang, Y. Zhang, Z. Zhang, and Y. Dong, “Dynamical modeling and simulation analysis of a nuclear desalination plant based on the MED-TVC process,” Desalination, vol. 456, pp. 121–135, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2019.01.020.
7. A. Farsi and I. Dincer, “Development and evaluation of an integrated MED/membrane desalination system,” Desalination, vol. 463, pp. 55–68, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2019.02.015.
8. J. Orfi, R. Sherif, and M. AlFaleh, “Conventional and Emerging Desalination Technologies: Review and Comparative Study from a Sustainability Perspective,” Water, vol. 17, no. 2, doi: 10.3390/w17020279.

9. M. Alhaj, F. Tahir, and S. G. Al-Ghamdi, “Life-cycle environmental assessment of solar-driven Multi-Effect Desalination (MED) plant,” Desalination, vol. 524, Feb. 2022, Art no. 115451, doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2021.115451.
10. A. Alenezi and Y. Alabaiadly, “Artificial Intelligence Applications in Water Treatment and Desalination: A Comprehensive Review,” Water, vol. 17, no. 8, doi: 10.3390/w17081169.
11. O. Behar, A. Khellaf, and K. Mohammedi, “A novel parabolic trough solar collector model – Validation with experimental data and comparison to Engineering Equation Solver (EES),” Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 106, pp. 268–281, Dec. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2015.09.045.
12. C. Tzivanidis, E. Bellos, and K. A. Antonopoulos, “Energetic and financial investigation of a stand-alone solar-thermal Organic Rankine Cycle power plant,” Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 126, pp. 421–433, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2016.08.033.
13. D. M. Cakici, A. Erdogan, and C. O. Colpan, “Thermodynamic performance assessment of an integrated geothermal powered supercritical regenerative organic Rankine cycle and parabolic trough solar collectors,” Energy, vol. 120, pp. 306–319, Feb. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2016.11.083.
14. V. Zare and A. Moalemian, “Parabolic trough solar collectors integrated with a Kalina cycle for high temperature applications: Energy, exergy and economic analyses,” Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 151, pp. 681–692, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2017.09.028.
15. Y. E. Yüksel, “Thermodynamic assessment of modified Organic Rankine Cycle integrated with parabolic trough collector for hydrogen production,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 43, no. 11, pp. 5832–5841, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.09.164.
16. F. Calise, M. D. d'Accadia, L. Libertini, and M. Vicidomini, “Thermoeconomic analysis of an integrated solar combined cycle power plant,” Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 171, pp. 1038–1051, Sept. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2018.06.005.
17. B. Ahlgren et al., “A simplified model for linear correlation between annual yield and DNI for parabolic trough collectors,” Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 174, pp. 295–308, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2018.08.008.
18. A. Desideri, R. Dickes, J. Bonilla, L. Valenzuela, S. Quoilin, and V. Lemort, “Steady-state and dynamic validation of a parabolic trough collector model using the ThermoCycle Modelica library,” Solar Energy, vol. 174, pp. 866–877, Nov. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2018.08.026.
19. L. Xu et al., “Analysis of optical and thermal factors’ effects on the transient performance of parabolic trough solar collectors,” Solar Energy, vol. 179, pp. 195–209, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2018.12.070.
20. S. Quezada–García, H. Sánchez–Mora, M. A. Polo–Labarrios, and R. I. Cázares–Ramírez, “Modeling and simulation to determine the thermal efficiency of a parabolic solar trough collector system,” Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, vol. 16, Dec. 2019, Art no. 100523, doi: 10.1016/j.csite.2019.100523.
21. A. Sandá, S. L. Moya, and L. Valenzuela, “Modelling and simulation tools for direct steam generation in parabolic-trough solar collectors: A review,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 113, Oct. 2019, Art no. 109226, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2019.06.033.
22. X. Zheng et al., “Mathematical modeling and performance analysis of an integrated solar heating and cooling system driven by parabolic trough collector and double-effect absorption chiller,” Energy and Buildings, vol. 202, Nov. 2019, Art no. 109400, doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109400.
23. H. Rashidi and J. Khorshidi, “Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of a solar based multigeneration system using multiobjective differential evolution algorithm,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 170, pp. 978–990, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.201.
24. H. C. N. Silva, J. C. C. Dutra, J. A. P. Costa, A. A. V. Ochoa, C. A. C. dos Santos, and M. M. D. Araújo, “Modeling and simulation of cogeneration systems for buildings on a university campus in Northeast Brazil – A case study,” Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 186, pp. 334–348, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2019.02.062.
25. D. Coppitters, F. Contino, A. Elbaz, P. Breuhaus, and W. De Paepe, “Techno-economic feasibility study of a solar-powered distributed cogeneration system producing power and distillate water: Sensitivity and exergy analysis,” Renewable Energy, vol. 150, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2019.10.105.
26. A. Khaliq, E. M. A. Mokheimer, and M. Yaqub, “Thermodynamic investigations on a novel solar powered trigeneration energy system,” Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 188, pp. 398–413, May 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2019.03.026.
27. F. Yilmaz, M. Ozturk, and R. Selbas, “Development and techno-economic assessment of a new biomass-assisted integrated plant for multigeneration,” Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 202, Dec. 2019, Art no. 112154, doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2019.112154.
28. F. Ren, J. Wang, S. Zhu, and Y. Chen, “Multi-objective optimization of combined cooling, heating and power system integrated with solar and geothermal energies,” Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 197, Oct. 2019, Art no. 111866, doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2019.111866.
29. P. P. Dutta et al., “Modeling and performance evaluation of a small solar parabolic trough collector (PTC) for possible purification of drained water,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 47, pp. 4226–4234, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.04.489.
30. I. Dincer, M. A. Rosen, and P. Ahmadi, Optimization of energy systems. Chichester: Wiley, 2017.
31. Y. M. El-Sayed, The thermoeconomics of energy conversions. Amsterdam Boston: Elsevier, 2003.
32. J. M. García, R. Vasquez Padilla, and M. E. Sanjuan, “Response Surface Optimization of an Ammonia–Water Combined Power/Cooling Cycle Based on Exergetic Analysis,” Journal of Energy Resources Technology, vol. 139, no. 2, 2016, doi: 10.1115/1.4034025.
33. H. Ghaebi, M. H. Saidi, and P. Ahmadi, “Exergoeconomic optimization of a trigeneration system for heating, cooling and power production purpose based on TRR method and using evolutionary algorithm,” Applied Thermal Engineering, vol. 36, pp. 113–125, Apr. 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2011.11.069.
34. M. Ameri, P. Ahmadi, and A. Hamidi, “Energy, exergy and exergoeconomic analysis of a steam power plant: A case study,” International Journal of Energy Research, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 499–512, 2009, doi: 10.1002/er.1495.
35. E. J. C. Cavalcanti, “Exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analyses of an integrated solar combined cycle system,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 67, pp. 507–519, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.017.
36. W. Spark. “Average Weather in Ad Dīwānīyah, Iraq, Year Round.” Accessed: Jul. 15, 2025. [Online]. https://weatherspark.com/y/103203/Average-Weather-in-Ad-D%C4%ABw%C4%81n%C4%AByah-Iraq-Year-Round.
37. M. F. Ezzat and I. Dincer, “Energy and exergy analyses of a novel ammonia combined power plant operating with gas turbine and solid oxide fuel cell systems,” Energy, vol. 194, Mar. 2020, Art no. 116750, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.116750.
38. S. Barbarelli, E. Berardi, M. Amelio, and N. M. Scornaienchi, “An Externally Fired Micro Combined-Cycle, with Largely Adjustable Steam Turbine, in a CHP System,” Procedia Manufacturing, vol. 42, pp. 532–537, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.02.036.
39. G. Fan et al., “Thermo-economic assessment and systematic comparison of combined supercritical CO2 and organic Rankine cycle (SCO2-ORC) systems for solar power tower plants,” Applied Thermal Engineering, vol. 236, Jan. 2024, Art no. 121715, doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2023.121715.
40. K. Sartor, S. Quoilin, and P. Dewallef, “Simulation and optimization of a CHP biomass plant and district heating network,” Applied Energy, vol. 130, pp. 474–483, Oct. 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.01.097.
41. S. Ghorbani, M. H. Khoshgoftar-Manesh, M. Nourpour, and A. M. Blanco-Marigorta, “Exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analyses of an integrated SOFC-GT-ORC hybrid system,” Energy, vol. 206, Sep. 2020, Art no. 118151, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.118151.
42. H. Vazini Modabber and M. H. Khoshgoftar Manesh, “Optimal exergetic, exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental design of polygeneration system based on gas Turbine-Absorption Chiller-Solar parabolic trough collector units integrated with multi-effect desalination-thermal vapor compressor- reverse osmosis desalination systems,” Renewable Energy, vol. 165, pp. 533–552, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.11.001.
43. A. Mouaky, A. Alami Merrouni, N. E. Laadel, and E. G. Bennouna, “Simulation and experimental validation of a parabolic trough plant for solar thermal applications under the semi-arid climate conditions,” Solar Energy, vol. 194, pp. 969–985, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2019.11.040.
44. Al-Zahrani, J. Orfi, Z. Al-Suhaibani, B. Salim, and H. Al-Ansary, “Thermodynamic Analysis of a Reverse Osmosis Desalination Unit with Energy Recovery System,” Procedia Engineering, vol. 33, pp. 404–414, Jan. 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2012.01.1220.
45. W. Zhou, L. Song, and T. K. Guan, “A numerical study on concentration polarization and system performance of spiral wound RO membrane modules,” Journal of Membrane Science, vol. 271, no. 1, pp. 38–46, Mar. 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2005.07.007.