Analysis of Superimposed Elementary Thermodynamic Cycles: from the Brayton-Joule to Advanced Mixed (Auto-Combined) Cycles

Abstract

The need for efficiency improvement in energy conversion systems leads to a stricter functional integration among system components. This results in structures of increasing complexity, the high performance of which are often difficult to be understood easily. To make the comprehension of these structures easier, a new approach is followed in this paper, consisting in their representation as partial or total superimposition of elementary thermodynamic cycles. Although system performance cannot, in general, be evaluated as the sum of the performance of the separate thermodynamic cycles, this kind of representation and analysis can be of great help in understanding directions of development followed in the literature for the construction of advanced energy systems, and could suggest new potential directions of work. The evolution from the simple Brayton-Joule cycle to the so called “mixed” cycles, in which heat at the turbine discharge is exploited using internal heat sinks only without using a separate bottoming section, is used to demonstrate the potentiality of the approach. Mixed cycles are named here "auto-combined cycles” to highlight the combination of different (gas and steam) cycles within the same system components.

• This paper is an updated version of a paper published in the ECOS'08 proceedings. 

Keywords

• superimposition, elementary thermodynamic cycles, Brayton, auto-combined cycle

References

1. Abdallah, H., Harvey, S., Performance potential of chemically recuperated gas turbine cycles compared to humid air cycles, Proc. of Flowers ’97, Florence, July 30 - August 1, 1997, pp. 831-842.
2. Aoki, S., Uematsu, K., Suenaga, K., Mori, H., Sugishita, H., A Study of hydrogen combustion turbine, ASME Paper GT-394. Aquaro, D., Pieve, M., High Temperature heat exchangers for power plants: Performance of advanced metallic recuperators, Applied Thermal Engineering, 2007, Vol. 27, pp. 389-400.
3. Bannister, R. L., Newby, R. A., Yang, W. C., Final Report on the Development of a Hydrogen-Fueled Combustion Turbine Cycle for Power Generation, ASME Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 1999, Vol. 121, pp. 38-45.
4. Chiesa, P., Lozza, G., Macchi, E., Consonni, S., An Assessment of the Thermodynamic Performance of Mixed Gas Steam Cycles: Part B – Water-Injected and HAT Cycles, Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 1995, vol. 117, pp. 499-508.
5. Chodkiewicz, R., Porochnicki, J., Kaczan, B., Steam–gas Condensing Turbine System for Power and Heat Generation, ASME 2001-GT-97.
6. Dellenback, P. A., Improved Gas Turbine Efficiency Through Alternative Regenerator Configuration, ASME GT-30133.
7. De Ruyck, J., Bram, S., Allard, G., REVAP cycle: a new evaporative cycle without saturation tower, Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 1997, Vol. 119, pp. 893-897.
8. Desideri, U., Ercolani, P., Yan, J., Thermodynamic Analysis of Hydrogen Combustion Turbine Cycles, ASME GT-95. Frutschi, H. U., Plancherel, A. A., Comparison of combined cycles with steam injection and evaporation cycles, Proc. ASME Cogen-Turbo II, pp. 137-145, 1988.

9. Gambini, M., Guizzi, G.L., Parametric Analysis on a New Hybrid Power Plant Based on Internal Combustion Steam Cycle (G.I.S.T. Cycle), Flowers '97, Florence, 1997, pp. 64.
10. Gambini, M., Guizzi, G. L., Vellini, M., Critical analysis of advanced H2/O2 cycles based on steam-methane reforming, ASME 2003-GT-38441.
11. Horlock, J. H., Advanced Gas Turbine Cycles, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2003.
12. Jericha, H., Göttlich, E., Sanz, W., Heitmeir, F., Design optimisation of the Graz cycle prototype plant, ASME 2003- GT-38120.
13. Kautz, M., Hansen, U., The externally-fired gas-turbine (EFGT-Cycle) for decentralized use of biomass, Applied Energy, 2007, Vol. 84, pp. 795-805.
14. Korobitsyn, M. A., New and Advanced Energy Conversion Technologies. Analysis of Cogeneration, Combined and Integrated Cycles, PhD thesis, Lab. of Thermal Eng., University of Twente, 1998.
15. Lazzaretto, A., Segato, F., A Systematic Approach to the Definition of the HAT Cycle Structure using the Pinch Technology, Proc. of ECOS 1999, Tokyo, Japan, June 8-10, , pp. 215-222.
16. Lazzaretto, A., Segato, F., Thermodynamic Optimization of the HAT Cycle Plant Structure – Part I: Optimization of the Basic Plant Configuration, Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 2001, Vol. 123, pp. 1-7.
17. Lazzaretto, A., Toffolo, A., On the Synthesis of Thermal Systems: a Method to Determine Optimal Heat Transfer Interactions, Proc. of ECOS 2006, Aghia Pelagia, Crete,
18. Greece, July 12-14, 2006, Vol. 1, pp. 493-501.
19. Lazzaretto, A., Toffolo, A., A method to separate the problem of heat transfer interactions in the synthesis of thermal systems, Energy, 2008, Vol. 33, pp. 163-170.
20. Macchi, E., Consonni, S., Lozza, G., Chiesa, P., An Assessment of the Thermodynamic Performance of Mixed Gas Steam Cycles: Part A – Intercooled and Steam Injected Cycles, Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 1995, vol. 117, pp. 489-498.
21. Nelson, A. L. C., Vaezi, V., Cheng, D. Y., A fifty percent plus efficiency mid range advanced Cheng cycle, ASME GT-30123.
22. Rice, I. G., Steam-Injected Gas Turbine Analysis: Steam Rates, Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, , Vol. 117, pp. 347-353. Sanz, W., Jericha, H., Moser, M., Heitmeir, F., Thermodynamic and economic investigation of an improved Graz cycle power plant for CO2 capture, ASME GT-53722.
23. Xu, Y., Jin, H., Lin, R., Han, W., System study on partial gasification combined cycle with CO2 recovery, ASME GT-91105.