Thermodynamic Analysis, Advanced Non-Linear Dynamic Simulation and Multi-Criteria Optimization of a 100 MW Parabolic Trough Solar Steam Power Plant

Abstract

Thermodynamic analyses of concentrating solar power plants and optimizing these cycles relying on the energetic and exergetic optimal efficiencies are quite common. However, it is found that just considering the efficiency of the system for performance optimization and neglecting the adverse effects of the plant's wrong operation timings, which is a function of the solar working fluid flow rate, can easily give misleading optimization results. This study's primary goal is to find the optimal operating point of the cycle in terms of the thermodynamic efficiencies considering the system's operating time. Thus, the Sliding Mode Control (SMC) approach is employed to provide a proper mass flow rate for the working fluid from the solar collector field to achieve a precise output temperature from the collectors in different operating conditions. Multi-objective optimization is performed using the Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) algorithm. The results of power block sensitivity analysis indicate that a 70℃ increase in the solar collector outlet temperature remarkably enhances electricity generation and exergetic efficiency by 67 and 48%. The two-objective optimization shows 22.01%, 2.10%, and 5.46% enhancement in response time, thermal efficiency, and exergetic efficiency, and the three-objective optimization reveals 3.68% and 3.74% improvement in efficiency (thermal and exergetic), respectively.

Keywords

• Dynamic
• Exergy
• Energy
• Thermodynamic
• Solar
• Power Plant

References

1. A. Arabkoohsar and G. B. B. Andresen, “Design and analysis of the novel concept of high temperature heat and power storage,” Energy, vol. 126, pp. 21–33, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.03.001.
2. M. Balghouthi, S. E. Trabelsi, M. Ben Amara, A. B. H. Ali, and A. Guizani, “Potential of concentrating solar power (CSP) technology in Tunisia and the possibility of interconnection with Europe,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 56, pp. 1227–1248, 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.052.
3. J. Sachdeva and O. Singh, “Thermodynamic analysis of solar powered triple combined Brayton, Rankine and organic Rankine cycle for carbon free power,” Renew. Energy, vol. 139, pp. 765–780, 2019.
4. J. Yang, J. Li, Z. Yang, and Y. Duan, “Thermodynamic analysis and optimization of a solar organic Rankine cycle operating with stable output,” Energy Convers. Manag., vol. 187, pp. 459–471, 2019.
5. H. Ishaq and I. Dincer, “Analysis and optimization for energy, cost and carbon emission of a solar driven steam-autothermal hybrid methane reforming for hydrogen, ammonia and power production,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 234, pp. 242–257, 2019.
6. H. Zhang, Y. Liu, X. Liu, and C. Duan, “Energy and exergy analysis of a new cogeneration system based on an organic Rankine cycle and absorption heat pump in the coal-fired power plant,” Energy Convers. Manag., vol. 223, p. 113293, 2020.
7. S. Adibhatla and S. C. Kaushik, “Exergy and thermoeconomic analyses of 500 MWe sub critical thermal power plant with solar aided feed water heating,” Appl. Therm. Eng., vol. 123, pp. 340–352, 2017.
8. C. Xu et al., “A thermodynamic analysis of a solar hybrid coal-based direct-fired supercritical carbon dioxide power cycle,” Energy Convers. Manag., vol. 196, pp. 77–91, 2019.

9. E. G. Cojocaru, J. M. Bravo, M. J. Vasallo, and D. M. Santos, “Optimal scheduling in concentrating solar power plants oriented to low generation cycling,” Renew. Energy, vol. 135, pp. 789–799, 2019.
10. K. Rashid, S. M. Safdarnejad, K. Ellingwood, and K. M. Powell, “Techno-economic evaluation of different hybridization schemes for a solar thermal/gas power plant,” Energy, vol. 181, pp. 91–106, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.05.130.
11. S. Khajepour and M. Ameri, “Techno-economic analysis of using three Fresnel solar fields coupled to a thermal power plant for different cost of natural gas,” Renew. Energy, vol. 146, pp. 2243–2254, 2020.
12. E. Tapaches, D. Salas, M. Perier-Muzet, S. Mauran, D. Aussel, and N. Mazet, “The value of thermochemical storage for concentrated solar power plants: economic and technical conditions of power plants profitability on spot markets,” Energy Convers. Manag., vol. 198, p. 111078, 2019.
13. M. Babaelahi, E. Mofidipour, and E. Rafat, “Design, dynamic analysis and control-based exergetic optimization for solar-driven Kalina power plant,” Energy, vol. 187, p. 115977, 2019.
14. T. Sung, S. Y. Yoon, and K. C. Kim, “A mathematical model of hourly solar radiation in varying weather conditions for a dynamic simulation of the solar organic rankine cycle,” energies, vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 7058–7069, 2015.
15. W. A. K. Al-Maliki, F. Alobaid, V. Kez, and B. Epple, “Modelling and dynamic simulation of a parabolic trough power plant,” J. Process Control, vol. 39, pp. 123–138, 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprocont.2016.01.002.
16. K. Rashid, K. Mohammadi, and K. Powell, “Dynamic simulation and techno-economic analysis of a concentrated solar power (CSP) plant hybridized with both thermal energy storage and natural gas,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 248, p. 119193, 2020.
17. F. Calise, M. D. d’Accadia, L. Libertini, and M. Vicidomini, “Thermoeconomic analysis of an integrated solar combined cycle power plant,” Energy Convers. Manag., vol. 171, pp. 1038–1051, 2018.
18. X. Li, E. Xu, L. Ma, S. Song, and L. Xu, “Modeling and dynamic simulation of a steam generation system for a parabolic trough solar power plant,” Renew. Energy, vol. 132, pp. 998–1017, 2019.
19. N. Abas, A. R. Kalair, M. Seyedmahmoudian, M. Naqvi, P. E. Campana, and N. Khan, “Dynamic simulation of solar water heating system using supercritical CO2 as mediating fluid under sub-zero temperature conditions,” Appl. Therm. Eng., vol. 161, p. 114152, 2019.
20. A. J. Gallego, G. M. Merello, M. Berenguel, and E. F. Camacho, “Gain-scheduling model predictive control of a Fresnel collector field,” Control Eng. Pract., vol. 82, pp. 1–13, 2019.
21. M. V. A. da Costa, A. Narasimhan, D. Guillen, B. Joseph, and D. Y. Goswami, “Generalized distributed state space model of a CSP plant for simulation and control applications: Single-phase flow validation,” Renew. Energy, vol. 153, pp. 36–48, 2020.
22. Z. Tian, J. Yuan, X. Zhang, L. Kong, and J. Wang, “Modeling and sliding mode predictive control of the ultra-supercritical boiler-turbine system with uncertainties and input constraints,” ISA Trans., vol. 76, pp. 43–56, 2018.
23. H. J. Mosleh and R. Ahmadi, “Linear parabolic trough solar power plant assisted with latent thermal energy storage system: A dynamic simulation,” Appl. Therm. Eng., vol. 161, p. 114204, 2019.
24. X. Chen, C. Liu, Q. Li, X. Wang, and X. Xu, “Dynamic analysis and control strategies of Organic Rankine Cycle system for waste heat recovery using zeotropic mixture as working fluid,” Energy Convers. Manag., vol. 192, pp. 321–334, 2019.
25. E. Mofidipour and M. Babaelahi, “New procedure in solar system dynamic simulation, thermodynamic analysis, and multi-objective optimization of a post-combustion carbon dioxide capture coal-fired power plant,” Energy Convers. Manag., vol. 224, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113321.
26. M. Babaelahi, E. Mofidipour, and E. Rafat, “Combined Energy-Exergy-Control (CEEC) analysis and multi-objective optimization of parabolic trough solar collector powered steam power plant,” Energy, vol. 201, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.117641.
27. Sidibba, Ahmed, Diene Ndiaye, Diouma Kobor, Menny El Bah, and Sidi Bouhamady. "Energy and exergy analysis of a solar photovoltaic module performance under the Sahelian Environment." International Journal of Physical Sciences 13, no. 12 (2018): 196-205.
28. J.-J. E. Slotine and W. Li, Applied nonlinear control, vol. 199, no. 1. Prentice hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1991.
29. R. Carmona, “Analysis, modeling and control of a distributed solar collector field with a one-axis tracking system,” Spanish Univ. Seville, Spain, 1985.
30. K. K. Mandal, M. Basu, and N. Chakraborty, “Particle swarm optimization technique based short-term hydrothermal scheduling,” Appl. Soft Comput., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 1392–1399, 2008.
31. T. E. Boukelia, M. S. Mecibah, B. N. Kumar, and K. S. Reddy, “Investigation of solar parabolic trough power plants with and without integrated TES (thermal energy storage) and FBS (fuel backup system) using thermic oil and solar salt,” Energy, vol. 88, pp. 292–303, 2015.