Energy, exergy, exergoeconomic, and exergoenvironmental analyses and multi-objective optimization of a CPC driven solar combined cooling and power cycle with different working fluids

Year 2021, Volume: 24 Issue: 2, 151 - 170, 26.05.2021

Sina Zandi , Kamyar Golbaten Mofrad , Afsane Moradifaraj , Gholam Reza Salehi

https://doi.org/10.5541/ijot.873456

Cited By: 10

Abstract

This paper aims to provide comprehensive 4E (energy, exergy, exergoeconomic, and exergoenvironmental) and advanced exergy analyses of the Refrigeration Cycle (RC) and Heat Recovery Refrigeration Cycle (HRRC) and comparison of the performance with R744 (CO2) and R744A (N2O) working fluids. Moreover, multi-objective optimization of the systems has been considered to define the optimal conditions and the best cycle from various perspectives. In HRRC, heat recovery is used as a heat source for an organic Rankine cycle. The energy and exergy analysis results show that utilizing HRRC with both refrigerants increases the coefficient of performance (COP) and exergy efficiency. COP and exergy efficiency for HRRC-R744 have been obtained 2.82 and 30.7%, respectively. Due to the better thermodynamic performance of HRRC, other analyses have been performed on this cycle. Exergoeconomic analysis results show that using R744A leads to an increase in the total product cost. Total product cost with R744 and R744A have been calculated by 1.56 $/h and 1.96$/h, respectively. Additionally, to obtain the processes' environmental impact, Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is used. Exergoenvironmental analysis showed that using R744A increases the product environmental impact by 32%. Owning to the high amount of endogenous exergy destruction rate in the compressor and ejector compared to other equipment, they have more priority for improvement. Multi-objective optimization has been performed with exergy efficiency and total product cost objective functions as well as COP and product environmental impact for both refrigerants, which indicates that HRRC-R744 has better performance economically and environmentally. In optimal condition, the value of exergy efficiency, total product cost, COP, and the product environmental impact have been accounted for by 28.51%, 1.44 $/h, 2.76, and 149.01 mpts/h, respectively.

Keywords

Combined cooling and power, Solar energy, Compound parabolic collector, exergoeconomic, exergoenvironmental, Multi-objective optimization, exergy

References

• Bellos, E., D. Korres, C. Tzivanidis, and K. Antonopoulos, Design, simulation and optimization of a compound parabolic collector. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 2016. 16: p. 53-63.
• Khalid, F., I. Dincer, and M.A. Rosen, Thermoeconomic analysis of a solar-biomass integrated multigeneration system for a community. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2017. 120: p. 645-653.
• Rosato, A., A. Ciervo, G. Ciampi, M. Scorpio, F. Guarino, and S. Sibilio, Energy, Environmental and Economic Dynamic Assessment of a Solar Hybrid Heating Network Operating with a Seasonal Thermal Energy Storage Serving an Italian Small-Scale Residential District: Influence of Solar and Back-up Technologies. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress, 2020: p. 100591.
• Modabber, H.V. and M.K. Manesh, 4E dynamic analysis of a water-power cogeneration plant integrated with solar parabolic trough collector and absorption chiller. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress. 21: p. 100785.
• Boyaghchi, F.A., M. Chavoshi, and V. Sabeti, Optimization of a novel combined cooling, heating and power cycle driven by geothermal and solar energies using the water/CuO (copper oxide) nanofluid. Energy, 2015. 91: p. 685-699.
• Boyaghchi, F.A. and M. Chavoshi, Multi-criteria optimization of a micro solar-geothermal CCHP system applying water/CuO nanofluid based on exergy, exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental concepts. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2017. 112: p. 660-675.
• Mehrpooya, M., M. Ashouri, and A. Mohammadi, Thermoeconomic analysis and optimization of a regenerative two-stage organic Rankine cycle coupled with liquefied natural gas and solar energy. Energy, 2017. 126: p. 899-914.
• Baghernejad, A., M. Yaghoubi, and K. Jafarpur, Exergoeconomic optimization and environmental analysis of a novel solar-trigeneration system for heating, cooling and power production purpose. Solar Energy, 2016. 134: p. 165-179.
• Nemati, A., H. Nami, and M. Yari, Assessment of different configurations of solar energy driven organic flash cycles (OFCs) via exergy and exergoeconomic methodologies. Renewable Energy, 2018. 115: p. 1231-1248.
• Saadon, S., L. Gaillard, C. Menezo, and S. Giroux-Julien, Exergy, exergoeconomic and enviroeconomic analysis of a building integrated semi-transparent photovoltaic/thermal (BISTPV/T) by natural ventilation. Renewable Energy, 2020. 150: p. 981-989.
• Caliskan, H., Energy, exergy, environmental, enviroeconomic, exergoenvironmental (EXEN) and exergoenviroeconomic (EXENEC) analyses of solar collectors. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2017. 69: p. 488-492.
• Moharramian, A., S. Soltani, M.A. Rosen, S. Mahmoudi, and M. Jafari, Conventional and enhanced thermodynamic and exergoeconomic analyses of a photovoltaic combined cycle with biomass post firing and hydrogen production. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2019. 160: p. 113996.
• Khaliq, A., Energetic and exergetic performance investigation of a solar based integrated system for cogeneration of power and cooling. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2017. 112: p. 1305-1316.
• Behzadi, A., E. Gholamian, P. Ahmadi, A. Habibollahzade, and M. Ashjaee, Energy, exergy and exergoeconomic (3E) analyses and multi-objective optimization of a solar and geothermal based integrated energy system. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2018. 143: p. 1011-1022.
• Montazerinejad, H., P. Ahmadi, and Z. Montazerinejad, Advanced exergy, exergo-economic and exrgo-environmental analyses of a solar based trigeneration energy system. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2019. 152: p. 666-685.
• Boyaghchi, F.A. and P. Heidarnejad, Thermoeconomic assessment and multi objective optimization of a solar micro CCHP based on Organic Rankine Cycle for domestic application. Energy conversion and Management, 2015. 97: p. 224-234.
• Esmaeilzadehazimi, M., M.H.K. Manesh, B.B. Heleyleh, and H.V. Modabbaer, 4E Analysis of Integrated MHD-Combined Cycle. International Journal of Thermodynamics, 2019. 22(4): p. 219-228.
• Sokhansefat, T., A. Kasaeian, K. Rahmani, A.H. Heidari, F. Aghakhani, and O. Mahian, Thermoeconomic and environmental analysis of solar flat plate and evacuated tube collectors in cold climatic conditions. Renewable Energy, 2018. 115: p. 501-508.
• Desai, N.B. and S. Bandyopadhyay, Thermo-economic comparisons between solar steam Rankine and organic Rankine cycles. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2016. 105: p. 862-875.
• Bonforte, G., J. Buchgeister, G. Manfrida, and K. Petela, Exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analysis of an integrated solar gas turbine/combined cycle power plant. Energy, 2018. 156: p. 352-359.
• Salehi, S., M. Yari, and M. Rosen, Exergoeconomic comparison of solar-assisted absorption heat pumps, solar heaters and gas boiler systems for district heating in Sarein Town, Iran. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2019. 153: p. 409-425.
• Sadi, M. and A. Arabkoohsar, Exergoeconomic analysis of a combined solar-waste driven power plant. Renewable energy, 2019. 141: p. 883-893.
• Wellmann, J., B. Meyer-Kahlen, and T. Morosuk, Exergoeconomic evaluation of a CSP plant in combination with a desalination unit. Renewable Energy, 2018. 128: p. 586-602.
• Cavalcanti, E.J., M.S. Lima, and G.F. de Souza, Comparison of carbon capture system and concentrated solar power in natural gas combined cycle: Exergetic and exergoenvironmental analyses. Renewable Energy, 2019.
• Sanaye, S., M. Amani, and P. Amani, 4E modeling and multi-criteria optimization of CCHPW gas turbine plant with inlet air cooling and steam injection. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 2018. 29: p. 70-81.
• Mofrad, K.G., S. Zandi, G. Salehi, and M.H.K. Manesh, 4E Analyses and Multi-Objective Optimization of Cascade Refrigeration Cycles with Heat Recovery System. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress, 2020: p. 100613.
• Mofrad, K.G., S. Zandi, G. Salehi, and M.K. Manesh, Comparative 4E and advanced exergy analyses and multi-objective optimization of refrigeration cycles with a heat recovery system. International Journal of Thermodynamics (IJoT), 2020. 23(3): p. 197-214.
• Adibhatla, S. and S. Kaushik, Energy, exergy, economic and environmental (4E) analyses of a conceptual solar aided coal fired 500 MWe thermal power plant with thermal energy storage option. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 2017. 21: p. 89-99.
• Ameri, M. and M. Mohammadzadeh, Thermodynamic, thermoeconomic and life cycle assessment of a novel integrated solar combined cycle (ISCC) power plant. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 2018. 27: p. 192-205.
• Panahi, R., M.H. Khanjanpour, A.A. Javadi, M. Akrami, M. Rahnama, and M. Ameri, Analysis of the thermal efficiency of a compound parabolic Integrated Collector Storage solar water heater in Kerman, Iran. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 2019. 36: p. 100564.
• Ghaith, F.A., Performance of solar powered cooling system using Parabolic Trough Collector in UAE. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 2017. 23: p. 21-32.
• Rafat, E., M. Babaelahi, and E. Mofidipour, Sustainability analysis of low temperature solar-driven kalina power plant using emergy concept. International Journal of Thermodynamics, 2019. 22(3): p. 118-126.
• MODABBER, H.V. and M.H.K. MANESH, 4E Analysis of Power and Water Cogeneration Plant based on Integrated MED-TVC and RO Desalination Units. International Journal of Thermodynamics. 23(2): p. 107-126.
• NIST National Institute of Standards and Technology, Thermophysical properties of fluid systems. [cited 2016; Available from: https://webbook.nist.gov/chemistry/fluid/.
• Kalogirou, S.A., Solar energy engineering: processes and systems. 2013: Academic Press.
• Cengel, Y.A. and M.A. Boles, Thermodynamics, An Engineering Approach, McGraw Hill. Higher education, 2007.
• Processing, archiving and distributing Earth science data at the NASA Langley Research Center. Available from: https://eosweb.larc.nasa.gov/.
• Petela, R., Exergy analysis of the solar cylindrical-parabolic cooker. Solar energy, 2005. 79(3): p. 221-233.
• Goswami, D.Y., The CRC handbook of mechanical engineering. 2004: CRC press.
• Wang, J., Y. Dai, and Z. Sun, A theoretical study on a novel combined power and ejector refrigeration cycle. International Journal of Refrigeration, 2009. 32: p. 1186-1194.
• Bejan, A., G. Tsatsaronis, and M. Moran, Thermal Design and Optimization John Wiley and Sons. Inc. New York, 1996.
• Zandi, S., K.G. Mofrad, G. Salehi, M.H.K. Manesh, and A. Fazeli, Multi-objective optimization and thermoeconomic analysis of a novel CCHP with TES and hybrid cooling for residential complex. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress, 2020. 19: p. 100656.
• Parikhani, T., H. Azariyan, R. Behrad, H. Ghaebi, and J. Jannatkhah, Thermodynamic and thermoeconomic analysis of a novel ammonia-water mixture combined cooling, heating, and power (CCHP) cycle. Renewable Energy, 2020. 145: p. 1158-1175.
• Mohammadkhani, F., N. Shokati, S. Mahmoudi, M. Yari, and M. Rosen, Exergoeconomic assessment and parametric study of a Gas Turbine-Modular Helium Reactor combined with two Organic Rankine Cycles. Energy, 2014. 65: p. 533-543.
• Mosaffa, A., L.G. Farshi, C.I. Ferreira, and M. Rosen, Exergoeconomic and environmental analyses of CO2/NH3 cascade refrigeration systems equipped with different types of flash tank intercoolers. Energy Conversion and Management, 2016. 117: p. 442-453.
• Zhang, X., R. Zeng, K. Mu, X. Liu, X. Sun, and H. Li, Exergetic and exergoeconomic evaluation of co-firing biomass gas with natural gas in CCHP system integrated with ground source heat pump. Energy conversion and management, 2019. 180: p. 622-640.
• Khosravi, A., R. Koury, and L. Machado, Thermo-economic analysis and sizing of the components of an ejector expansion refrigeration system. International Journal of Refrigeration, 2018. 86: p. 463-479.
• Zhou, C., E. Doroodchi, and B. Moghtaderi, An in-depth assessment of hybrid solar–geothermal power generation. Energy conversion and management, 2013. 74: p. 88-101.
• Ahmadi, P., I. Dincer, and M.A. Rosen, Exergy, exergoeconomic and environmental analyses and evolutionary algorithm based multi-objective optimization of combined cycle power plants. Energy, 2011. 36: p. 5886-5898.
• Cavalcanti, E.J.C., Exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analyses of an integrated solar combined cycle system. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2017. 67: p. 507-519.
• Meyer, L., G. Tsatsaronis, J. Buchgeister, and L. Schebek, Exergoenvironmental analysis for evaluation of the environmental impact of energy conversion systems. Energy, 2009. 34: p. 75-89.
• Manesh, M.K., P. Navid, M. Baghestani, S.K. Abadi, M. Rosen, A. Blanco, et al., Exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental evaluation of the coupling of a gas fired steam power plant with a total site utility system. Energy Conversion and Management, 2014. 77: p. 469-483.