Research Article

Evaluation of harvest timing and genotypic effect on bioactive composition and antioxidant activity of wheatgrass from traditional and modern wheat cultivars

Volume: 13 Number: 1 March 9, 2026
EN TR

Evaluation of harvest timing and genotypic effect on bioactive composition and antioxidant activity of wheatgrass from traditional and modern wheat cultivars

Abstract

Wheatgrass has gained increasing attention due to its high content of bioactive compounds and associated health benefits. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of harvest timing and wheat variety on plant growth, phytochemical composition—including chlorophyll a (Chl a), chlorophyll b (Chl b), total chlorophyll content (TCC), total phenolic content (TPC), and total flavonoid content (TFC)—as well as antioxidant capacity in wheatgrass obtained from modern bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.; cv. Tosunbey) and ancestral einkorn wheat (Triticum monococcum ssp. monococcum; cv. IZA). Seedlings were harvested at 10 different growth stages (5 to 15 days old). The results revealed that 9-day-old bread wheatgrass exhibited the highest Chl a (9.43 mg/g FW), Chl b (2.69 mg/g FW), and TCC (12.12 mg/g FW). In contrast, 9-day-old einkorn wheatgrass had the highest TPC (55.18 ± 0.29 mg FAE/g DW) and TFC (263.11 ± 1.92 mg QE/g DW). Notably, the strongest antioxidant activity (2.29 mg/L), comparable to ascorbic acid (2.26 mg/L), was observed in 5-day-old einkorn wheatgrass. The peak levels of TCC, TPC, and TFC were consistently detected on day 9 in both species. These findings highlight the critical role of harvest timing and genetic variation in optimizing the nutritional and functional properties of wheatgrass. While 9-day-old seedlings exhibited the highest phytochemical accumulation, the strongest antioxidant activity was observed in 5-day-old einkorn wheatgrass. Overall, einkorn wheatgrass demonstrated a more potent antioxidant system and higher phenolic and flavonoid content, whereas bread wheatgrass excelled in chlorophyll accumulation, emphasizing distinct compositional advantages between the two wheat varieties.

Keywords

References

  1. Adhikari, B., Joshi, S., & Maskey, B. (2022). Effects of harvesting period on phytochemicals of wheatgrass (Triticum aestivum, WK 1204 variety). Caraka Tani: Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 37(1), 36–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.20961/carakatani.v37i1.52076
  2. Ahmed, Z., Faisal Manzoor, M., Hussain, A., Hanif, M., & Zia-ud-Din Zeng, X.A. (2021). Study the impact of ultra-sonication and pulsed electric field on the quality of wheat plantlet juice through FTIR and SERS. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 76, 105648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2021.105648
  3. Akbas, E., Kilercioglu, M., Onder, O.N., Koker, A., & Soyler, B., Oztop, M.H. (2017). Wheatgrass juice to wheat grass powder: Encapsulation, physical and chemical characterization. Journal of Functional Foods, 28, 19–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2016.11.010
  4. Avisar, A., Cohen, M., Katz, R., Shentzer Kutiel, T., Aharon, A., & Bar-Sela, G. (2020). Wheatgrass juice administration and immune measures during adjuvant chemotherapy in colon cancer patients: Preliminary results. Pharmaceuticals, 13(6), 129. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph13060129
  5. Banerjee, S., Katiyar, P., Kumar, V., Waghmode, B., Nathani, S., Krishnan, V., Sircar, D., & Roy, P. (2021). Wheatgrass inhibits the lipopolysaccharide-stimulated inflammatory effect in RAW 264.7 macrophages. Current Research in Toxicology, 2, 116 127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crtox.2021.02.005
  6. Benincasa, P., Galieni, A., Manetta, A.C., Pace, R., Guiducci, M., Pisante, M., & Stagnari, F. (2015). Phenolic compounds in grains, sprouts and wheatgrass of hulled and nonhulled wheat species. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 95, 1795–1803. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.6877
  7. Benincasa, P., Tosti, G., Farneselli, M., Maranghi, S., Bravi, E., Marconi, O., Falcinelli, B., & Guiducci, M. (2020). Phenolic content and antioxidant activity of einkorn and emmer sprouts and wheatgrass obtained under different radiation wavelengths. Annals of Agricultural Sciences, 65, 68–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aoas.2020.02.001
  8. Brand-Williams, W., Cuvelier, M. E., & Berset, C. (1995). Use of a free radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity. LWT - Food Science and Technology, 28, 25–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0023-6438(95)80008-5

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Plant Biochemistry , Plant Biotechnology , Botany (Other)

Journal Section

Research Article

Early Pub Date

January 8, 2026

Publication Date

March 9, 2026

Submission Date

May 20, 2025

Acceptance Date

October 16, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 13 Number: 1

APA
Pehlivan Karakaş, F. (2026). Evaluation of harvest timing and genotypic effect on bioactive composition and antioxidant activity of wheatgrass from traditional and modern wheat cultivars. International Journal of Secondary Metabolite, 13(1), 144-159. https://doi.org/10.21448/ijsm.1700714
International Journal of Secondary Metabolite

e-ISSN: 2148-6905