This study employs CFD to compare dry and wet marine exhaust systems under identical conditions: a 15 m/s exhaust velocity at 470 °C and a 125 mm pipe. The dry exhaust, discharging into air, forms a buoyant plume extending approximately five pipe diameters with temperatures exceeding 200 °C downstream. Jet velocity remains above 5 m/s at 4D, and turbulence kinetic energy decreases by ~30% over the same distance. In contrast, the wet exhaust submerged in seawater cools below 60 °C within 2D, and jet velocity drops under 2 m/s by 1.5D. A localized static pressure rise of +12 kPa at the outlet is observed, approximately 100 times greater than the <0.12 kPa disturbance in the dry case. Turbulence decays by ~80% within 2D downstream of the wet exit. Dry exhaust ensures efficient plume dispersion with minimal back-pressure but risks deck contamination, whereas wet exhaust provides thermal suppression and signature reduction at the expense of higher engine load. Future work should explore transient, three-dimensional simulations for improved design guidance.
| Primary Language | English |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Maritime Engineering (Other) |
| Journal Section | Research Article |
| Authors | |
| Submission Date | July 1, 2025 |
| Acceptance Date | August 20, 2025 |
| Publication Date | September 9, 2025 |
| IZ | https://izlik.org/JA54DK52SH |
| Published in Issue | Year 2025 Volume: 1 Issue: 1 |