As a Public Diplomacy Component Technology Management Policy and Technology Transfer Offices of Turkey

Abstract

This paper explores the role of Turkey's National Technology Management Policy and Technology Transfer Offices (TTOs) as components of public diplomacy. The National Technology Management Policy plays a significant role in shaping Turkey's international image, influence, and soft power. The centralized approach to policy formulation and implementation underscores the strategic alignment of technology management policies with the country's objectives, including those related to public diplomacy. Additionally, TTOs play a crucial role in facilitating the transfer of technologies and knowledge between universities, research institutions, and industry, contributing to Turkey's technological advancement and competitiveness. The paper evaluates the impact of these components on Turkey's public diplomacy efforts and their potential to enhance the country's international standing and influence.

Keywords

• Technology Management Policy
• Technology Transfer Offices
• Public Diplomacy
• International Image
• Soft Power
• Innovation

References

1. Niu, Y. (2022). China's Digital Public Diplomacy during the 2022 Beijing Winter Olympics. Journal of Political Science Research, 3(1), 44-53. https://doi.org/10.23977/polsr.2022.030107
2. Kayani, F. N. (2023). The Flourishing Economic and Political Relations of Turkey & Azerbaijan: An Overview after 30th Diplomatic Anniversary. Eurasian Journal of Social Sciences, 11(2), 68-74. https://doi.org/10.15604/ejss.2023.11.02.003
3. Alemna, A. (1999). The impact of new information technology in Africa. Information Development, 15(3), 167-170. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666994239868
4. Bakır, C. (2020). The Turkish state’s responses to existential covid-19 crisis. Policy and Society, 39(3), 424-441. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2020.1783786
5. Bozeman, B., Rimes, H., & Youtie, J. (2015). The evolving state-of-the-art in technology transfer research: revisiting the contingent effectiveness model. Research Policy, 44(1), 34-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.06.008
6. Branstetter, L. and Chen, J. (2006). The impact of technology transfer and r & d on productivity growth in Taiwanese industry: microeconometric analysis using plant and firm-level data. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 20(2), 177-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjie.2005.11.001
7. Chhetri, H. (2022). Foreign trade, foreign direct investment and economic growth in Nepal. Janapriya Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 11(1), 75-93. https://doi.org/10.3126/jjis.v11i1.51648
8. Cunningham, J., Lehmann, E., Menter, M., & Seitz, N. (2019). The impact of university focused technology transfer policies on regional innovation and entrepreneurship. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 44(5), 1451-1475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-019-09733-0

9. Çevik, S. (2019). Reassessing turkey’s soft power: the rules of attraction. Alternatives Global Local Political, 44(1), 50-71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0304375419853751
10. Çevik, S. and Sevin, E. (2017). A quest for soft power: turkey and the Syrian refugee crisis. Journal of Communication Management, 21(4), 399-410. https://doi.org/10.1108/jcom-04-2017-0042
11. Çinar, Ö. Altuntas, S., & Alan, M. (2020). Technology transfer and its impact on innovation and firm performance: empirical evidence from Turkish export companies. Kybernetes, 50(7), 2179-2207. https://doi.org/10.1108/k-12-2019-0828
12. Danziger, R. and Schreiber, M. (2021). Digital diplomacy: face management in mfa twitter accounts. Policy & Internet. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.269
13. Doncel-Martín, I., Catalan-Matamoros, D., & Elías, C. (2022). Corporate social responsibility and public diplomacy as formulas to reduce hate speech on social media in the fake news era. Corporate Communications an International Journal, 28(2), 340-352. https://doi.org/10.1108/ccij-04-2022-0040
14. Donelli, F. (2019). Persuading through culture, values and ideas: the case of turkey’s cultural diplomacy. Insight Turkey. https://doi.org/10.25253/99.2019ev.04
15. Elswah, M. and Howard, P. (2021). Where news could not inspire change: trt world as a party broadcaster. Journalism, 23(10), 2079-2095. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849211033444
16. Ercan, C. and Kale, I. (2017). Historical space steps of turkey: it is high time to establish the Turkish space agency. Acta Astronautica, 130, 67-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2016.10.019
17. Fai, F., Beer, C., & Schutte, C. (2018). Towards a novel technology transfer office typology and recommendations for developing countries. Industry and Higher Education, 32(4), 213-225. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950422218780614
18. Gafarli, O. (2023). Relations with Russia in the context of turkey’s policy in constructing its ‘strategic autonomy’. Uluslararası I·lişkiler Dergisi, 20(79), 33-50. https://doi.org/10.33458/uidergisi.1358280
19. Gilboa, E. (2008). Searching for a theory of public diplomacy. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 55-77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716207312142
20. Hermansson, H. (2018). Challenges to decentralization of disaster management in turkey: the role of political-administrative context. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(5), 417-431. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2018.1466898
21. Hovsepyan, L. (2023). The main factors underpinning turkey–china relations: the ‘turkic world’ narrative and its implications for future relations. China Report, 59(4), 456-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/00094455231188100
22. Huang, Z. (2021). A historical–discursive analytical method for studying the formulation of public diplomacy institutions. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 18(3), 204-215. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-021-00246-y Jia, Y., Liu, C., Chen, Y., & Zhu, Q. (2020). The construction of science and technology innovation policy design framework—take Shandong province as an example. Journal of Industry-University Collaboration, 2(1), 34-48. https://doi.org/10.1108/jiuc-08-2019-0015
23. Kalachishvili, M. (2023). Digital age of diplomacy and its impact on foreign policy. HUM, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.31578/hum.v12i1.515
24. Kose, I., Rayner, J., Birinci, S., Ulgu, M., Yilmaz, I., & Guner, S. (2020). Adoption rates of electronic health records in Turkish hospitals and the relation with hospital sizes. BMC Health Services Research, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05767-5
25. Kuyucu, T. (2020). The great failure: the roles of institutional conflict and social movements in the failure of regeneration initiatives in Istanbul. Urban Affairs Review, 58(1), 129-163. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087420957736
26. Manfredi-Sánchez, J. (2022). Thinking about Latin American public diplomacy. Latin American Policy, 13(1), 6-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/lamp.12242
27. Mazumdar, A. (2020). India’s public diplomacy in the twenty-first century: components, objectives and challenges. India Quarterly a Journal of International Affairs, 76(1), 24-39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0974928419901188
28. Namuq, B. and Al-BAYATI, M. (2021). Employing digital diplomacy in foreign policy: Israel as a model IAGS. https://doi.org/10.7176/iags/90-05‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬
29. Nga, L. and Quang, T. (2021). Public diplomacy in strengthening India: Vietnam relations. India Quarterly a Journal of International Affairs, 77(2), 289-303. https://doi.org/10.1177/09749284211005012
30. Oladeji, S. and Adegboye, A. (2019). Science and technology policy for Nigeria's development planning. Journal of Education Society and Behavioural Science, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.9734/jesbs/2019/v32i430182
31. Oztig, L. (2022). Policy styles and pandemic management: the case of turkey. European Policy Analysis, 8(3), 261-276. https://doi.org/10.1002/epa2.1155
32. Pavón-Guinea, A. (2023). « it’s the context, stupid»: the european union’s public diplomacy in times of ontological insecurity. Communication & Society, 291-309. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.36.2.291-309
33. Ranga, M., Temel, S., Ar, İ., Yeşilay, R., & Sukan, F. (2016). Building technology transfer capacity in Turkish universities: a critical analysis. European Journal of Education, 51(1), 90-106. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12164
34. Raslan, R. (2024). Climbing up the ladder: technology transfer-related policies in the context of the belt and road initiative. Utrecht Law Review, 20(1), 19-43. https://doi.org/10.36633/ulr.922
35. Shuyuan, X. and Ma, H. (2016). Analysis on the impact of international technology transfer on china's industrial restructuring and upgrading. International Journal of Innovation Management and Technology, 7(3), 86-89. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijimt.2016.7.3.650
36. Simons, G. (2020). Russian foreign policy and public diplomacy: meeting 21st century challenges. Vestnik Rudn International Relations, 20(3), 491-503. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2020-20-3-491-503
37. Sinell, A., Iffländer, V., & Muschner, A. (2018). Uncovering transfer – a cross-national comparative analysis. European Journal of Innovation Management, 21(1), 70-95. https://doi.org/10.1108/ejim-01-2017-0006
38. Steane, N., Hwang, E., & Coluccello, S. (2022). South Korea’s public diplomacy actors in Uzbekistan. European Journal of Korean Studies, 95-124. https://doi.org/10.33526/ejks.20222201.95
39. Sun, Y. (2024). The impact of the depth of technology transfer type provisions in regional trade agreements on international science and technology cooperation - an empirical study based on rcep member countries. 61-67. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-408-2_8
40. Tepe, S. and Alemdaroğlu, A. (2021). How authoritarians win when they lose. Journal of Democracy, 32(4), 87-101. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2021.0054
41. Ünlü, H., Temel, S., & Miller, K. (2022). Understanding the drivers of patent performance of university science parks in turkey. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 48(3), 842-872. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-022-09929-x
42. Waroonkun, T. and Stewart, R. (2007). Modeling the international technology transfer process in construction projects: evidence from Thailand. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(6), 667-687. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-007-9043-1
43. White, C. (2015). Exploring the role of private-sector corporations in public diplomacy. Public Relations Inquiry, 4(3), 305-321. https://doi.org/10.1177/2046147x15614883
44. Yiblet, F. (2024). Unlocking new opportunities: brics partnership and its implications for economic development in African countries. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Business Innovation, 11(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.5296/jebi.v11i1.22012
45. Zamanli, E. (2022). Intensification cycle in digital diplomacy. Kne Social Sciences, 70-86. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v7i2.10278
46. Zanello, G., Fu, X., Mohnen, P., & Ventresca, M. (2015). The creation and diffusion of innovation in developing countries: a systematic literature review. Journal of Economic Surveys, 30(5), 884-912. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12126
47. Zhong, P. (2022). The impact of foreign technology transfer on firm productivity. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.220405.274
48. Zulham, M., Saragih, H., Ambarwati, R., & Silitonga, T. (2020). Turkey's involvement in the Syrian conflict from a defense management perspective. Ajis Academic Journal of Islamic Studies, 5(2), 81. https://doi.org/10.29240/ajis.v5i2.1915