Resting state is not actually a state of rest, as confirmed by the loss of physiological complexity in brain dynamics

Hasan Fehmi Özel; Hasan Kazdağlı

doi:10.17944/interdiscip.1676000

Resting state is not actually a state of rest, as confirmed by the loss of physiological complexity in brain dynamics

Abstract

Objective: The human brain operates with complex, non-linear dynamics that enable adaptability to cognitive demands. Physiological complexity, measured through electroencephalography (EEG), provides insights into neural organization and function. This study examines how cognitive load induced by verbal mental tasks affects brain complexity using fractal analysis. Method: EEG data from 36 healthy young adults (9 males and 27 females, aged 18–26 years) were obtained from the publicly available PhysioNet database. These recordings were collected with prior ethical approval and informed consent, and no new data were acquired for the present study. Participants completed a resting-state session followed by a mental arithmetic task with verbal commands. Detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA) was employed to assess EEG complexity, and a novel domain-based complexity loss parameter (dS) was introduced to quantify deviations from an idealized reference. Statistical comparisons were conducted using two-way ANOVA with Šídák correction, and all analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism version 10 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). Results: Cognitive load led to a significant reduction in DFA values, particularly in the temporal and frontal regions, indicating decreased physiological complexity. dS values increased significantly in the temporal regions, supporting the hypothesis that cognitive demand alters neural dynamics. These findings align with the default mode network concept, highlighting a shift from a high-complexity resting state to a more structured and synchronized state under cognitive load. Conclusion: The results suggest that physiological complexity decreases during verbal cognitive tasks, with the strongest effects in temporal regions. This supports the use of EEG fractal analysis in assessing cognitive workload and neural efficiency. Future studies should explore its applications in clinical and human-computer interaction contexts.

Keywords

Ethical Statement

Since this study is conducted with open database, ethics committee approval is not required, and the Helsinki Declaration rules were followed to conduct this study.

Thanks

We would like to thank Zyma et al for sharing their database.

References

He F and Yuan Y. Nonlinear system identification of neural systems from neurophysiological signals. Neuroscience 2021;458:213-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2020.12.001
Gao J, Hu J, Tung WW. Complexity measures of brain wave dynamics. Cogn Neurodyn 2011;5(2):171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11571-011-9151-3
Juen Z, Shen-Hsing A. Brain entropy, fractal dimensions and predictability: a review of complexity measures for EEG in healthy and neuropsychiatric populations. European Journal of Neuroscience 2022;56(7):5047-5069. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.15800
Yang AC, Wang SJ, Lai KL, Tsai CF, Yang CH, Hwang JP, et al. Cognitive and neuropsychiatric correlates of EEG dynamic complexity in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2013;47(2):52-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2013.07.022
Margreeth Smits F, Porcaro C, Cottone C, Cancelli A, Maria Rossini P, Tecchio F. Electroencephalographic Fractal Dimension in Healthy Ageing and Alzheimer’s Disease. PloS one, 2016;11(2):e0149587. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149587
Buckner RL, Andrews-Hanna JR, Schacter DL. The brain’s default network: anatomy, function, and relevance to disease. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2008;1124(1):1-38. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1440.011
Vatansever D, Menon DK, Manktelow AE, Sahakian BJ, Stamatakis EA. Default mode network connectivity during task execution. Neuroimage 2015;122:96-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.07.053
Fernández A, Zuluaga P, Abásolo D, Gómez C, Serra A, Méndez MA, et al. Brain oscillatory complexity across the life span. Clinical Neurophysiology 2012;123(11):2154-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2012.04.025

Gonzalez-Burgos G, Cho RY, Lewis DA. Alterations in cortical network oscillations and parvalbumin neurons in schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry 2015;77(12):1031-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.03.010
Takahashi T, Cho RY, Mizuno T, Kikuchi M, Murata T, Takahashi K, et al. Antipsychotics reverse abnormal EEG complexity in drug-naive schizophrenia: A multiscale entropy analysis. Neuroimage 2010;51(1):173-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.02.009
Xiang J, Li C, Li H, Cao R, Wang B, Han X, et al. The detection of epileptic seizure signals based on fuzzy entropy. J Neurosci Methods 2015;243:18-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.01.015
Bosl WJ, Tager-Flusberg H, Nelson CA. EEG Analytics for Early Detection of Autism Spectrum Disorder: A data-driven approach. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):6828. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-24318-x
Kramer AF. Physiological metrics of mental workload: A review of recent progress. Multiple-task performance. 1st ed. London: CRC Press; 2020:279-328.
Huang J, Traylor Z, Choo S, Nam CS. Neural Correlates of Mental Workload During Multitasking: a Dynamic Causal Modeling Study. Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting. 1st ed. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications; 2021. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181321651003
Antonenko P, Paas F, Grabner R, van Gog T. Using Electroencephalography to Measure Cognitive Load. Educ Psychol Rev. 2010;22(4):425-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9130-y
Raufi B, Longo L. An Evaluation of the EEG Alpha-to-Theta and Theta-to-Alpha Band Ratios as Indexes of Mental Workload. Front Neuroinform 2022;16:861967. https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2022.861967
Anjum MF, Espinoza A, Cole R, Singh A, May P, Uc E, et al. Resting-state EEG measures cognitive impairment in Parkinson’s disease. npj Parkinson’s Disease 2023;10(1):6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41531-023-00602-0
Abásolo D, Simons S, Morgado da Silva R, Tononi G, Vyazovskiy V V. Lempel-Ziv complexity of cortical activity during sleep and waking in rats. J Neurophysiol 2015;113(7):2742-52. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00575.2014
Meisel C, Bailey K, Achermann P, Plenz D. Decline of long-range temporal correlations in the human brain during sustained wakefulness. Sci Rep 2017;7(1):11825. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-12140-w
Hou D, Wang C, Chen Y, Wang W, Du J. Long-range temporal correlations of broadband EEG oscillations for depressed subjects following different hemispheric cerebral infarction. Cogn Neurodyn 2017;11(6):529-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11571-017-9451-3
Zyma I, Tukaev S, Seleznov I, Kiyono K, Popov A, Chernykh M, et al. Electroencephalograms during mental arithmetic task performance. Data. 2019;4(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/data4010014
Goldberger AL, Peng CK, Lipsitz LA. What is physiologic complexity and how does it change with aging and disease? Neurobiology of aging 2002;23(1):23-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0197-4580(01)00266-4
Peng CK, Havlin S, Stanley HE, Goldberger AL. Quantification of scaling exponents and crossover phenomena in nonstationary heartbeat time series. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science 1995;5(1):82-7. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.166141
Ozel HF, Kazdagli H. A simple approach to determine loss of physiological complexity in heart rate series. Biomed Phys Eng Express 2023;9(4). https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/acd254
Jiang Z, Ning Y, An B, Li A, Feng H. Detecting Mental EEG Properties Using Detrended Fluctuation Analysis. 2005 IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 27th Annual Conference. IEEE, 2006. p. 2017-2020. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.2005.1616852
Knecht S, Deppe M, Dräger B, Bobe L, Lohmann H, Ringelstein EB, et al. Language lateralization in healthy right-handers. Brain 2000;123(1):74-81. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/123.1.74
Pujol J, Deus J, Losilla JM, Capdevila A. Cerebral lateralization of language in normal left-handed people studied by functional MRI. Neurology. 1999;52(5):1038-43. doi: 10.1212/wnl.52.5.1038.
Springer JA, Binder JR, Hammeke TA, Swanson SJ, Frost JA, Bellgowan PSF, et al. Language dominance in neurologically normal and epilepsy subjects: a functional MRI study. Brain 1999;122(11):2033-45. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/122.11.2033
Li Z, Li J, Xia Y, Feng P, Feng F. Variation Trends of Fractal Dimension in Epileptic EEG Signals. Algorithms. 2021;14(11):316. https://doi.org/10.3390/a14110316
Liu J, Yang Q, Yao B, Brown RW, Yue GH. Linear Correlation Between Fractal Dimension of EEG Signal and Handgrip Force. Biol Cybern. 2005;93(2):131-40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-005-0561-3
Rahatabad FN, Rangraz P, Dalir M, Nasrabadi AM. The Relation Between Chaotic Feature of Surface EEG and Muscle Force. J Med Signals Sens. 2021;11(4):229-36. https://doi.org/10.4103/jmss.JMSS_47_20
Shenhav A, Botvinick MM, Cohen JD. The expected value of control: An integrative theory of anterior cingulate cortex function. Neuron 2013;79(2):217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2013.07.007
Raghavendra BS, Dutt DN, Halahalli HN, John JP. Complexity analysis of EEG in patients with schizophrenia using fractal dimension. Physiol Meas. 2009;30(8):795-808. https://doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/30/8/005
Zappasodi F, Olejarczyk E, Marzetti L, Assenza G, Pizzella V, Tecchio F. Fractal dimension of EEG activity senses neuronal impairment in acute stroke. PLoS One. 2014 Jun 26;9(6). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0100199
Chen QF, Zhang XH, Zou TX, Huang NX, Chen HJ. Reduced Cortical Complexity in Cirrhotic Patients with Minimal Hepatic Encephalopathy. Neural Plast 2020;2020(1):7364649. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7364649
Al-Nuaimi AHH, Jammeh E, Sun L, Ifeachor E. Complexity Measures for Quantifying Changes in Electroencephalogram in Alzheimer's Disease. Complexity 2018;2018(1):8915079. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8915079
Uthayakumar R, Easwaramoorthy D. Epileptic seizure detection in EEG signals using multifractal analysis and wavelet transform. Fractals 2013;21(2):1350011. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218348X13500114
Ruiz de Miras J, Derchi CC, Atzori T, Mazza A, Arcuri P, Salvatore A, et al. Spatio-Temporal Fractal Dimension Analysis from Resting State EEG Signals in Parkinson's Disease. Entropy. 2023;25(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/e25071017
Jenkins AC. Rethinking Cognitive Load: A Default-Mode Network Perspective. Trends Cogn Sci 2019;23(7):531-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.04.008
Crittenden BM, Mitchell DJ, Duncan J. Recruitment of the default mode network during a demanding act of executive control. Elife. 2015;4:e06481. https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.06481.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Neurosciences (Other)

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Hasan Fehmi Özel
0000-0003-1676-0648
Türkiye

Hasan Kazdağlı ^*
0000-0001-6617-604X
Türkiye

Publication Date

April 16, 2026

Submission Date

April 14, 2025

Acceptance Date

December 18, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 17 Number: 57

DOI

https://doi.org/10.17944/interdiscip.1676000

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA48SZ53JZ

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Özel, H. F., & Kazdağlı, H. (2026). Resting state is not actually a state of rest, as confirmed by the loss of physiological complexity in brain dynamics. Interdisciplinary Medical Journal, 17(57), 10-18. https://doi.org/10.17944/interdiscip.1676000

AMA

1.Özel HF, Kazdağlı H. Resting state is not actually a state of rest, as confirmed by the loss of physiological complexity in brain dynamics. Interdiscip Med J. 2026;17(57):10-18. doi:10.17944/interdiscip.1676000

Chicago

Özel, Hasan Fehmi, and Hasan Kazdağlı. 2026. “Resting State Is Not Actually a State of Rest, As Confirmed by the Loss of Physiological Complexity in Brain Dynamics”. Interdisciplinary Medical Journal 17 (57): 10-18. https://doi.org/10.17944/interdiscip.1676000.

EndNote

Özel HF, Kazdağlı H (April 1, 2026) Resting state is not actually a state of rest, as confirmed by the loss of physiological complexity in brain dynamics. Interdisciplinary Medical Journal 17 57 10–18.

IEEE

[1]H. F. Özel and H. Kazdağlı, “Resting state is not actually a state of rest, as confirmed by the loss of physiological complexity in brain dynamics”, Interdiscip Med J, vol. 17, no. 57, pp. 10–18, Apr. 2026, doi: 10.17944/interdiscip.1676000.

ISNAD

Özel, Hasan Fehmi - Kazdağlı, Hasan. “Resting State Is Not Actually a State of Rest, As Confirmed by the Loss of Physiological Complexity in Brain Dynamics”. Interdisciplinary Medical Journal 17/57 (April 1, 2026): 10-18. https://doi.org/10.17944/interdiscip.1676000.

JAMA

1.Özel HF, Kazdağlı H. Resting state is not actually a state of rest, as confirmed by the loss of physiological complexity in brain dynamics. Interdiscip Med J. 2026;17:10–18.

MLA

Özel, Hasan Fehmi, and Hasan Kazdağlı. “Resting State Is Not Actually a State of Rest, As Confirmed by the Loss of Physiological Complexity in Brain Dynamics”. Interdisciplinary Medical Journal, vol. 17, no. 57, Apr. 2026, pp. 10-18, doi:10.17944/interdiscip.1676000.

Vancouver

1.Hasan Fehmi Özel, Hasan Kazdağlı. Resting state is not actually a state of rest, as confirmed by the loss of physiological complexity in brain dynamics. Interdiscip Med J. 2026 Apr. 1;17(57):10-8. doi:10.17944/interdiscip.1676000