Öğretmenlerin Konfor Alanı Yönelimleri ve İş Performansları Üzerine Kesitsel Bir Araştırma

Mehmet Uzun; Akif Köse

doi:10.17679/inuefd.1672919

TR EN

Öğretmenlerin Konfor Alanı Yönelimleri ve İş Performansları Üzerine Kesitsel Bir Araştırma

Abstract

Bu araştırmada, bireylerin konfor alanlarında kalmaya veya çıkmaya yönelik eğilimlerini yansıtan konfor alanı yönelimleri ile iş performansları arasındaki ilişkinin öğretmenler bağlamında kesitsel olarak incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Tarama modelinde desenlenen araştırmanın evrenini, 2023-2024 eğitim-öğretim yılında Kahramanmaraş ili merkez ilçelerinde (Onikişubat, Dulkadiroğlu) görev yapan 9078 öğretmen; örneklemini ise küme ve tabakalı örnekleme yöntemiyle belirlenen 796 öğretmen oluşturmuştur. Araştırmanın verileri, “Konfor Alanı Yönelim Ölçeği” ve “Öğretmen İş Performansı Ölçeği” aracılığıyla toplanmıştır. Araştırmanın alt amaçları doğrultusunda, değişkenler arasındaki ilişkiler gerekli varsayımlar kontrol edildikten sonra korelasyon ve yapısal regresyon analizleriyle incelenmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular, konfor alanı yöneliminin boyutları ile iş performansının boyutları arasında pozitif yönlü anlamlı ilişkiler bulunduğunu göstermiştir. Yapısal regresyon analizi sonucunda; konfor alanı yöneliminin “meydan okuma” boyutunun, iş performansının görev, bağlamsal ve uyumsal performans boyutlarının anlamlı bir yordayıcısı olduğu; “konfor alanında kalma” boyutunun ise iş performansının sadece bağlamsal performans boyutunu anlamlı düzeyde yordadığı belirlenmiştir. Meydan okuma boyutunun özellikle uyumsal performansla diğer iş performansı boyutlarına kıyasla daha güçlü bir ilişki kurduğu; konfor alanında kalmanın ise bağlamsal performansla zayıf bir ilişki gösterdiği saptanmıştır. Konfor alanı yöneliminin iş performansındaki varyansı sınırlı düzeyde açıkladığı belirlenmiştir. Araştırmanın son kısmında, elde edilen sonuçlara dayalı olarak uygulayıcılara ve araştırmacılara yönelik öneriler sunulmuştur.

Keywords

Konfor alanı yönelimi, İş performansı, Öğretmen

A Cross-Sectional Study on Teachers' Comfort Zone Orientation and Job Performance

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the cross-sectional relationship between comfort zone orientation—defined as individuals’ tendencies to remain within or move beyond their comfort zones—and job performance in terms of the teaching profession. Designed using a survey model, the research population comprised 9,078 teachers employed in the central districts of Kahramanmaraş (Onikişubat, Dulkadiroğlu) during the 2023–2024 academic year. A sample of 796 teachers was selected by using cluster and stratified sampling methods. The study employed the Comfort Zone Orientation Scale and the Teacher Job Performance Scale as data collection tools. Based on the research questions, the relationships between variables were analyzed through correlation and structural regression methods after the verification of relevant statistical assumptions. The results suggested significant and positive relationships between the dimensions of comfort zone orientation and those of job performance. Structural regression analysis revealed that the “challenge” dimension significantly predicted task, contextual, and adaptive performance, whereas the “staying in the comfort zone” dimension was a significant predictor only of contextual performance. The challenge dimension demonstrated the strongest association with adaptive performance, while the comfort zone dimension demonstrated a weaker relation with contextual performance. Besides, comfort zone orientation was identified to explain only a limited proportion of the variance in job performance. Based on the findings, various recommendations were provided for practitioners and researchers.

Keywords

Comfort zone orientation, Job Performance, Teacher

References

Akbay, L. (2021). İlişkisel araştırmalar. S. Şen & İ. Yıldırım (Eds.), Eğitimde araştırma yöntemleri içinde (ss.117-136). Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x
Bond, F. W., & Flaxman, P. E. (2006). The ability of psychological flexibility and job control to predict learning, job performance, and mental health. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 26(1-2), 113-130. https://doi.org/10.1300/J075v26n01_05
Borman, W.C., & Motowidlo, S.J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In N. Schmitt & W. C. Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 71- 98). Jossey-Bass.
Borman, W. C., Penner, L. A., Allen, T. D., & Motowidlo, S. (2001). Personality predictors of citizenship performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9(1-2), 52–69.
Brewer, G. A., & Walker, R. M. (2012). Personnel constraints in public organizations: The impact of reward and punishment on organizational performance. Public Administration Review, 73(1), 121-131. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02681.x
Campbell, J. P. (1990). Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 687–732). Consulting Psychologists Press.
Campbell, J. P., & Wiernik, B. M. (2015). The modeling and assessment of work performance. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2, 47-74.
Carter, W. R., Nesbit, P. L., Badham, R. J., Parker, S. K., & Sung, L. K. (2016). The effects of employee engagement and self-efficacy on job performance: A longitudinal field study. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 29(17), 2483–2502. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2016.1244096
Charbonnier-Voirin, A., El Akremi, A., & Vandenberghe, C. (2010). A multilevel model of transformational leadership and adaptive performance and the moderating role of climate for innovation. Group & Organization Management, 35(6), 699-726. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601110390833

Chen, J., & Lee, J. C.-K. (2022). Teacher resilience matters: A buffering and boosting effect between job driving factors and their well-being and job performance. Teachers and Teaching, 28(7), 890-907. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2022.2116574
Chen, J., Li, Y., Yang, L., & Xu, W. (2023). Teacher emotions do predict teacher effectiveness: Empirical evidence from Chinese teachers. In R. B. King et al. (Eds.), Positive psychology and positive education in Asia (pp. 133-149). Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5571-8_8
Chu, L., Lee, C., Huang, K., & Lin, J. (2013). How personality traits mediate the relationship between flow experience and job performance. The Journal of International Management Studies, 8(1), 33-46.
Chughtai, A. A. (2022). Trust propensity and job performance: The mediating role of psychological safety and affective commitment. Current Psychology: A Journal for Diverse Perspectives on Diverse Psychological Issues, 41(10), 6934-6944. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01157-6
Cohen, L., Manion, L, & Morrison, K. (2021). Eğitimde araştırma yöntemleri. E. Dinç & K. Kıroğlu (Çev. Eds.). [Research Methods in Education]. Pegem Akademi.
Dilekçi, Ü. (2018). Öğretmenlerin öğretim duygu durumları ve algıladıkları uyumsal performansları [Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi]. Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi.
Eden, S. (2014). Out of the comfort zone: Enhancing work-based learning about employability through student reflection on work placements. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 38(2), 266-276. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2014.911826
Eysenck, M. W. (1985). Anxiety and cognitive-task performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 6(5), 579-586. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(85)90007-8
Falter, M. M., & Barnes, M. E. (2020). The importance of the “comfort zone” in preservice teachers’ evaluation of video analysis sessions as a tool for enhanced reflection. Teacher Education Quarterly, 47(2), 64–85.
Fathlistya, W., & Mustika, M. D. (2020). How perceived individual safety attitude helps to explain the relationship between sensation seeking and risk-taking propensity in the prediction of individual work performance. Jurnal RAP (Riset Aktual Psikologi), 11(2), 191-204. https://doi.org/10.24036/rapun.v11i2.110589
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
Geukes, K., Harvey, J. T., Trezise, A., & Mesagno, C. (2017). Personality and performance in real-world competitions: Testing trait activation of fear of negative evaluation, dispositional reinvestment, and athletic identity in the field. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 31, 101-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2017.02.008
Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., & Anderson, R.E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis. Pearson Education
Hogan, J., Rybicki, S. L., Motowidlo, S. J., & Borman, W. C. (1998). Relations between contextual performance, personality, and occupational advancement. Human Performance, 11(2-3), 189-207. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.1998.9668031
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Huang, J. L., Ryan, A. M., Zabel, K. L., & Palmer, A. (2014). Personality and adaptive performance at work: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(1), 162-179. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034285
Iyiola, K., Alzubi, A., & Dappa, K. (2023). The influence of learning orientation on entrepreneurial performance: The role of business model innovation and risk-taking propensity. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 9(3), Article e100133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100133
Kiknadze, N. (2018). Comfort zone orientation: Moving beyond one’s comfort zone [Honors thesis]. Duke University, DU Dukespace. From https://hdl.handle.net/10161/16710
Kiknadze, N.C., & Leary, M.R. (2021). Comfort zone orientation: Individual differences in the motivation to move beyond one's comfort zone. Personality and Individual Differences, 181, Article e111024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111024
Kline, R. B. (2019). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesinin ilkeleri ve uygulaması. S. Şen (Çev. Ed.). [Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling]. Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
Koopmans, L., Bernaards, C. M., Hildebrandt, V. H., Schaufeli, W. B., de Vet Henrica, C. W., & van der Beek, A. J. (2011). Conceptual frameworks of individual work performance: A systematic review. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 53(8), 856-866. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0b013e318226a763
Köse, A., & Uzun, M. (2024). Konfor Alanı Yönelim Ölçeğinin (KAYÖ) Türkçe uyarlaması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi (AUEBFD), 57(1), 287-327. https://doi.org/10.30964/auebfd.1288823
Limon, İ. (2019). Eğitim örgütlerinde değişim yorgunluğu, eğitim politikaları bağlamında moral yitimi ve iş performansı arasındaki ilişki [Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi]. Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi.
Limon, İ., & Sezgin-Nartgün, Ş. (2020). Development of Teacher Job Performance Scale and determining teachers' job performance level. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 13(3), 564-590. http://dx.doi.org/10.30831/akukeg.642340
Maresh, E. L., Teachman, B. A., & Coan, J. A. (2017). Are you watching me? Interacting effects of fear of negative evaluation and social context on cognitive performance. Journal of Experimental Psychopathology, 8(3), 303-319. https://doi.org/10.5127/jep.059516
Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı [MEB]. (2023). 2023 yılı idare faaliyet raporu. Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı, Strateji Geliştirme Başkanlığı. https://sgb.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2024_03/02091736_meb2023yiliidare faaliyetraporu.pdf
Motowidlo, S. J., Borman, W. C., & Schmit, M. J. (1997). A theory of individual differences in task and contextual performance. Human Performance, 10(2), 71-83. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1002_1
Murphy, K. R. (1989). Dimensions of job performance. In R. F. Dillon & J. W. Pellegrino (Eds.), Testing: Theoretical and applied perspectives (pp. 218-247). Praeger Publishers.
Nadler, R.S. (1995). Edgework: Stretching boundaries and generalizing experiences. The Journal of Experiential Education, 18(1), 52-55. https://doi.org/10.1177/105382599501800110
Niessen, C., & Lang, J. W. B. (2021). Cognitive control strategies and adaptive performance in a complex work task. Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(10), 1586-1599. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000830
Parker, S. K., & Turner, N. (2002). Work design and individual work performance: Research findings and an agenda for future inquiry. In S. Sonnentag (Ed.), Psychological management of individual performance (pp. 69-93). John Wiley & Sons.
Prazeres, L. (2017). Challenging the comfort zone: Self-discovery, everyday practices and international student mobility to the Global South. Mobilities, 12(6), 908-923. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2016.1225863
Pulakos, E. D., Arad, S., Donovan, M. A., & Plamondon, K. E. (2000). Adaptability in the workplace: Development of a taxonomy of adaptive performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(4), 612-624. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.85.4.612
Riley, K., & Solic, K. (2017). Change happens beyond the comfort zone: Bringing undergraduate teacher candidates into activist teacher communities. Journal of Teacher Education, 68(2), 179 –192. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248711668773
Russo-Netzer, P., & Cohen, G. L. (2022). ‘If you’re uncomfortable, go outside your comfort zone’: A novel behavioral ‘stretch’ intervention supports the well-being of unhappy people. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 18(3), 394-410. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2022.2036794
Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23-74.
Schindler, A. K., Seidel, T., Boheim, R., Knogler, M., Weil, M., Alles, M., & Groschner, A. (2021). Acknowledging teachers’ individual starting conditions and zones of development in the course of professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 100, Article e103281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103281
Sonnentag, S., Volmer, J., & Spychala, A. (2008). Job performance. In J. Barling & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational behavior: Volume I-micro perspectives (pp. 427-448). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200448
Stangor, C., Carr, C., & Kiang, L. (1998). Activating stereotypes undermines task performance expectations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(5), 1191-1197. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.5.1191
Starks, B. C., Harrison, L., & Denhardt, K. (2011). Outside the comfort zone of the classroom. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 22(2), 203-225, https://doi.org/10.1080/10511253.2010.517773
Şen, S. (2020). Mplus ile yapısal eşitlik modellemesi uygulamaları. Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
Taba, M.I. (2018). Mediating effect of work performance and organizational commitment in the relationship between reward system and employees’ work satisfaction. Journal of Management Development, 37(1), 65-75. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-11-2016-0256
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidel, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics. Allyn & Bacon.
Teoh, H. Y., & Foo, S. L. (1997). Moderating effects of tolerance for ambiguity and risk-taking propensity on the role conflict-perceived performance relationship: Evidence from Singaporean entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 12, 67-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(96)00035-3
Vales, L. A., & Banayo, A. F. (2022). Professional stress dimensions and the job performance among elementary teachers: Input to a school-based stress management program. International Journal of Research Publications, 106(1), 227-234. https://doi.org/10.47119/IJRP1001061820223724
Van Aarde, N., Meiring, D., & Wiernik, B. M. (2017). The validity of the Big Five personality traits for job performance: Meta‐analyses of South African studies. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 25(3), 223-239. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12175
Van Gelderen, M. (2023). Using a comfort zone model and daily life situations to develop entrepreneurial competencies and an entrepreneurial mindset. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article e1136707. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1136707
Visser, T. (2020). The interactions between psychological capital on job satisfaction and job performance of high school teachers in Gauteng [Unpublished master thesis]. North-West University.
White, A. (2009). From comfort zone to performance management. White & MacLean Publishing.
Yıldırım, M., Dilekçi, Ü., & Manap, A. (2024). Mediating roles of meaning in life and psychological flexibility in the relationships between occupational stress and job satisfaction, job performance, and psychological distress in teachers. Front. Psycho, 15, Article e1349726. https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1349726
Zhang, D. C., Barratt, C. L., & Smith, R. W. (2024). The bright, dark, and grey sides of risk takers at work: Criterion validity of risk propensity for contextual performance at work. Journal of Business and Psychology, 39, 275-294 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-023-09872-0

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

Education Management

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Mehmet Uzun
0000-0003-2786-5533
Türkiye

Akif Köse ^*
0000-0002-4813-6375
Türkiye

Publication Date

September 2, 2025

Submission Date

April 9, 2025

Acceptance Date

July 28, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 26 Number: 2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.1672919

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA85RK82AS

APA

Uzun, M., & Köse, A. (2025). Öğretmenlerin Konfor Alanı Yönelimleri ve İş Performansları Üzerine Kesitsel Bir Araştırma. İnönü University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 26(2), 1354-1389. https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.1672919

AMA

1.Uzun M, Köse A. Öğretmenlerin Konfor Alanı Yönelimleri ve İş Performansları Üzerine Kesitsel Bir Araştırma. INUJFE. 2025;26(2):1354-1389. doi:10.17679/inuefd.1672919

Chicago

Uzun, Mehmet, and Akif Köse. 2025. “Öğretmenlerin Konfor Alanı Yönelimleri Ve İş Performansları Üzerine Kesitsel Bir Araştırma”. İnönü University Journal of the Faculty of Education 26 (2): 1354-89. https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.1672919.

EndNote

Uzun M, Köse A (September 1, 2025) Öğretmenlerin Konfor Alanı Yönelimleri ve İş Performansları Üzerine Kesitsel Bir Araştırma. İnönü University Journal of the Faculty of Education 26 2 1354–1389.

IEEE

[1]M. Uzun and A. Köse, “Öğretmenlerin Konfor Alanı Yönelimleri ve İş Performansları Üzerine Kesitsel Bir Araştırma”, INUJFE, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 1354–1389, Sept. 2025, doi: 10.17679/inuefd.1672919.

ISNAD

Uzun, Mehmet - Köse, Akif. “Öğretmenlerin Konfor Alanı Yönelimleri Ve İş Performansları Üzerine Kesitsel Bir Araştırma”. İnönü University Journal of the Faculty of Education 26/2 (September 1, 2025): 1354-1389. https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.1672919.

JAMA

1.Uzun M, Köse A. Öğretmenlerin Konfor Alanı Yönelimleri ve İş Performansları Üzerine Kesitsel Bir Araştırma. INUJFE. 2025;26:1354–1389.

MLA

Uzun, Mehmet, and Akif Köse. “Öğretmenlerin Konfor Alanı Yönelimleri Ve İş Performansları Üzerine Kesitsel Bir Araştırma”. İnönü University Journal of the Faculty of Education, vol. 26, no. 2, Sept. 2025, pp. 1354-89, doi:10.17679/inuefd.1672919.

Vancouver

1.Mehmet Uzun, Akif Köse. Öğretmenlerin Konfor Alanı Yönelimleri ve İş Performansları Üzerine Kesitsel Bir Araştırma. INUJFE. 2025 Sep. 1;26(2):1354-89. doi:10.17679/inuefd.1672919

Öğretmenlerin Konfor Alanı Yönelimleri ve İş Performansları Üzerine Kesitsel Bir Araştırma

Abstract

Keywords

A Cross-Sectional Study on Teachers' Comfort Zone Orientation and Job Performance

Abstract

Keywords

References

Details

Primary Language

Subjects

Journal Section

Authors

Publication Date

Submission Date

Acceptance Date

Published in Issue

DOI

IZ

Cite