Determining the Effect of Inquiry-Based STEM Activities on the Creative Personality Traits of Disadvantaged Female Students

Edanur Şahin; Funda Okuşluk

doi:10.17679/inuefd.1718625

TR EN

Sorgulama Temelli STEM Etkinliklerinin Dezavantajlı Kız Öğrencilerin Yaratıcı Kişilik Özelliklerine Etkisinin Belirlenmesi

Abstract

Bu araştırmanın amacı sorgulama temelli STEM etkinliklerinin dezavantajlı kız öğrencilerin yaratıcı kişilik özelliklerine etkisinin belirlenmesidir. Bu kapsamda araştırma Malatya ilinde gelir düzeyi düşük bir çevrede bulunan ortaokullarda öğrenim gören ve bölgedeki bir semt konağına kayıtlı 31 kız öğrenci ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bu öğrenciler amaçlı rastgele örnekleme yöntemi ile belirlenmiştir. Seçilen öğrenciler beş günlük süreyle sorgulama temelli STEM etkinliklerine katılmışlardır. Araştırmada açıklayıcı karma yöntem kullanılmıştır. Araştırma modeli, tek gruplu ön-test son-test için uygun olan yarı deneysel bir desendir. Nicel veri toplama aracı olarak öğrencilerin yaratıcı kişilik özelliklerini ölçmek için “Yaratıcı Kişilik Özellikleri Ölçeği” kullanılmıştır. Araştırmanın nitel boyutu ise nicel verileri desteklemek amacıyla tarafımızca düzenlenen “Bilgi Edinme Defterleri” ile “Ürün Geliştirme Defterleri” ayrıca Öğrenci Günlükleri ve Demografik Özellikler Formu kullanılmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda, dezavantajlı kız öğrencilerin sorgulama temelli STEM ile ilgili olumlu yönde düşünceleri olduğu görülmüştür. Sorgulama temelli yapılan STEM etkinliklerinin öğrencilerin yaratıcı kişilik özellikleri üzerinde anlamlı bir etkisinin olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Diğer taraftan akademik başarı, sınıf düzeyi ve okulöncesi eğitim alma durumunun dezavantajlı kız öğrencilerin yaratıcı kişilik özelliklerine olan etkisi alt boyutlar açısından incelenerek sınıf düzeyi değişkeninin içsel motivasyon alt boyutu hariç olmak üzere bu demografik özelliklerin yaratıcı kişilik özellikleri üzerinde anlamlı bir etkisinin olmadığı sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

Keywords

Sorgulama Temelli STEM, Yaratıcı Kişilik Özelliği, STEM Eğitimi

Project Number

SYL-2023-3061

Determining the Effect of Inquiry-Based STEM Activities on the Creative Personality Traits of Disadvantaged Female Students

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine the effect of inquiry-based STEM activities on the creative personality traits of disadvantaged female students. In this context, the study was conducted with 31 female students enrolled in middle schools located in a low-income district of Malatya, who were also registered at a local community center. These students were selected through a purposive random sampling method. The selected participants engaged in inquiry-based STEM activities for a period of five days. A explanatory mixed methods design was employed in the study. The research design corresponds to a quasi-experimental model with a single-group pre-test–post-test structure. The quantitative data were collected using the “Creative Personality Traits Scale” to measure the students’ creative personality characteristics. To support the quantitative findings, qualitative data were gathered through “Knowledge Acquisition Notebooks” and “Product Development Notebooks,” both of which were designed by the researchers, as well as through student diaries and a demographic characteristics form. The findings indicated that the disadvantaged female students developed positive perceptions toward inquiry-based STEM activities. It was concluded that inquiry-based STEM activities had a significant positive effect on their creative personality traits. On the other hand, when academic achievement, grade level, and pre-school education status were examined in terms of their impact on the sub-dimensions of creative personality traits, only the grade level variable showed a significant effect on the sub-dimension of intrinsic motivation. For the other demographic variables, no significant effects were found on the students’ creative personality traits.

Keywords

Inquiry-Based STEM, creative personality trait, STEM education

Supporting Institution

Inonu University Scientific Research Projects Unit

Project Number

SYL-2023-3061

Ethical Statement

This study was conducted in accordance with scientific research and ethical principles. Ethical approval was obtained prior to data collection from the Social and Human Sciences Ethics Committee of Inonu University under the decision number 2022/2-3. Participation in the study was voluntary, and informed consent was obtained from all students and their legal guardians. There are no conflicts of interest associated with this study.

Thanks

This study was supported by the Inonu University Scientific Research Projects Unit under project number SYL-2023-3061. The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude for this support.

References

Arya, M., & Maurya, S. P. (2016). Relationship between creativity, intelligence and academic achievement among school going children. Studies on Home and Community Science, 10(1-3), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/09737189.2016.11885359
Beghetto, R. A. (2010). Creativity in the classroom. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 447–463). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511763205.028
Behnamnia, N., Kamsin, A., İsmail, B. M. A., & Hayati, S. A. (2025). Relationship between creative thinking and outcomes in a digital STEM-based learning environment: A mixed methods case study. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 57(101816). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2025.101816
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. National Academy Press.
Bushell, G. (2006). Moderation of peer assessment in group projects. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 31, 91–108.
Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2013). Scientific research method. Pegem Academy.
Canbazoğlu, H. B., & Tümkaya, S. (2020). Evaluation of fourth-grade primary school students’ attitudes toward science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) in terms of various variables. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 11(1), 188-209. https://doi.org/10.16949/ turkbilmat.655216
Capobianco, B. M., Diefes-Dux, H. A., Mena, I., & Weller, J. (2011). What is an engineer? Implications of elementary school student conceptions for engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(2), 304–328. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00015.x
Chan, C. H. R. (2022). A social cognitive perspective on gender disparities in self‑efficacy, interest, and aspirations in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM): the influence of cultural and gender norms. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(37), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00352-0
Cheryan, S., Ziegler, S. A., Montoya, A. K., & Jiang, L. (2017). Why are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others? Psychological Bulletin, 143(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000052

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Çorlu, M. S. (2017). STEM: Integrated teaching. In M. S. Çorlu & E. Çallı (Eds.), STEM theory and practice (pp. 1–10). Pusula Publishing.
Deaux, K., & Lafrance, M. (1998). Gender. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 788–827). McGraw-Hill.
Demirkol, K. (2022). The relationship between middle school students’ career interests in STEM fields and teachers’ STEM attitudes and self-efficacy (Publication No. 725288) [Master’s thesis, Kırşehir Ahi Evran University]. National Thesis Center of the Council of Higher Education. https://openaccess.ahievran.edu.tr/ xmlui/handle/20.500.12513/6474
Donnon, T., McIlwrick, J., & Woloschuk, W. (2013). Investigating the reliability and validity of self and peer assessment to measure medical students’ Professional competencies. Creative Education, 4(6A), 23-28.
Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (2012). Social role theory. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 458–476). Sage Publications Ltd. https://doi. org/10.4135/9781446249222.n49
Eccles, S. J. (1994). Understanding women’s educational and occupational choices: Applying the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18(4), 585-609. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1994.tb01049.x
Edelson, D. C., Gordin, D. N., & Pea, R. D. (1999). Addressing the challenges of inquiry-based learning through technology and curriculum design. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8(3), 391–450. https://doi.org/10.108 0/10508406.1999.9672075
Erbay, M., & Aktan, O. (2022). Examination of gifted students’ creative personality traits according to various variables. Journal of Turkish Educational Sciences, 20(3), 1151-1168. https://doi.org/10.37217/tebd.1147945
Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). Sage Publications Ltd.
Henriksen, D. (2014). Full STEAM ahead: Creativity in excellent STEM teaching practices. The STEAM Journal, 1(2), 15. https://doi.org/10.5642/steam.20140102.15
Irak, M. (2019). The effect of STEM applications designed for the “Propagation of Light” unit in fifth-grade science on academic achievement and attitudes toward STEM (Publication No. 546356) [Master’s thesis, Kocaeli University]. Council of Higher Education National Thesis Center.
Khoiriyah, S., Wiliyanti, V., & Gunawan, I. (2024). The Influence of the STEM learning approach on students communication and collaboration abilities on elasticity materials. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Fisika, 15(3), 263-271. https://doi.org/10.26877/jp2f.v15i3.18724
Koenig, A. M., & Eagly, A. H. (2014). Evidence for the social role theory of stereotype content: Observations of groups’ roles shape stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(3), 371–392. https://doi. org/10.1037/a0037215
Kutlu, Ö., Doğan, C. D., & Karakaya, İ. (2010). Determining student achievement through performance- and portfoliobased assessment. Pegem Academy Publishing.
Kutru, Ç., & Hasançebi, F. (2024The effect of argumentation-based science learning (ABSL)-supported STEM education on seventh-grade students’ communication skills, scientific creativity, problem-solving skills, and critical thinking dispositions. Journal of Buca Faculty of Education, 59, 139-175. https://doi.org/10.53444/ deubefd.1336324
Kwon, H., & Lee, Y. (2025). A meta-analysis of STEM project-based learning on creativity. STEM Education, 5(2), 275–290.https://doi.org/10.3934/steme.2025014
Lin, C., Lee, H., Wang, W., Huang, Y., & Wu, T. (2025). Enhancing reflective thinking in STEM education through experiential learning: The role of generative AI as a learning aid. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 6315–6337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13072-5
Marshall, C., Rossman, G. B., & Blanco, G. L. (2022). Designing qualitative research (7th ed.). Sage.
Mayers, A. (2013). Introduction to statistics and SPSS in psychology. Harlow: Pearson Education.
Miller, D., Eagly, H. A., & Linn, M. C. (2015).Women’s representation in science predicts national gender-science stereotypes: Evidence from 66 nations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(3), 631-644.https://doi. org/10.1037/edu0000005
Minstrell, J., & van Zee, E. H. (2000). Inquiry into inquiry: Reflections on the study of teaching and learning science. In J. Minstrell & E. H. van Zee (Eds.), Inquiry into inquiry learning and teaching in science (pp. 1–10). American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS).
Moss-Racusin, C. A., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Graham, M. J., & Handelsman, J. (2012). Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(41), 16474–16479. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1211286109
Nosek, B. A., Smyth, F. L., Sriram, N., Lindner, N. M., Devos, T., Ayala, A., Bar-Anan, Y., Berg, R., Cai, H., Gonsalkolare, K., Kesebir, S., Maliszewski, N., Neto, F., Olli, E., Park, J., Schnabel, K., Shiomura, K., Tulbure, B. T., Wiers, R. W., ... & Greenwald, A. G. (2009). National differences in gender–science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(26), 10593–10597. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0809921106
Olatoye, R., Akintunde, S., & Ogunsanya, E. (2010). Relationship between creativity and academic achievement of business administration students in Southwestern Polytechnics, Nigeria. African Research Review, 4(3), 134- 149. https://doi.org/10.4314/afrrev.v4i3.60164
Palaniappan, A. K. (2008). Influence of Intelligence on the relationship between creativity and academic achievement: A comparative study. The International Journal of Learning: Annual Review, 15(7), 267-278. https://doi.org/10.18848/1447-9494/CGP/v15i07/45850
Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., de Jong, T., vanRiesen, S. A. N., Kamp, E. T., Manoli, C. C., Zacharia, Z. C., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003
Ram, I., Lewin, D. R., Barzilai, A., Chumtonov, O., & Roll, I. (2025). Active learning and the development of 21st century skills in online STEM education: A Large-scale survey. Online Learning, 29(1), 4–31. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v29i1.3533
Renfrow, D. G., & Howard, J. A. (2013). Social roles. In J. DeLamater & A. Ward (Eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology (pp. 421–440). Springer.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6772-0_17
Rizki, I., & Suprapto, N. (2024). Project-oriented problem-based learning through SR-STEM to foster students’ critical thinking skills in renewable energy material. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 33, 526–541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-024-10102-2
Runco, M. A., & Acar, S. (2012). Divergent thinking as an indicator of creative potential. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.652929
Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.650092
Saw, K. K. N., & Han, B. (2022). Prospective teachers’ academic success in Myanmar: Successful intelligence and personality effects. Journal of Education for Teaching, 48(1), 72-88, https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2021. 1959266
Septiyanto, A., Rusyati, L., Suhendi, E., Kaniawati, I., & Prima, E. C. (2025). Solar cells project on STEM-Design thinking to foster students’ creative thinking skills, creative dispositions, and creative product. SN Social Sciences, 5(155), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-025-01196-5
Siew, N. M., Amir, N., & Chong, C. L. (2015). The perceptions of pre-service and in-service teachers regarding a project-based STEM approach to teaching science. Springer Plus, 4(8). https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801- 4-8
Şahin, F., & Danışman, Ş. (2017). Creative personality traits scale: A reliability and validity study. Journal of Karabuk University Institute of Social Sciences, 7(2), 747-760.
Van Horne, C., & Rakedzon, T. (2024). Teamwork made in China: Soft skill development with a side of friendship in the STEM classroom. Education Sciences, 14(3), 248. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14030248
Yıldırım, A., & Şimsek, H. (2008). Qualitative research methods in the social sciences. Seçkin Publishing.
Yılmaz, H. (2023). Creative personality traits, creative thinking tendencies, and critical thinking tendencies of pre-service preschool teachers. Western Anatolia Journal of Educational Sciences, 14(2), 1412-1430. https:// doi.org/10.51460/baebd.1363259
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
Worell, J. (2001). Feminist interventions: Accountability beyond symptom reduction. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 25(4), 335–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-6402.00033
Zeitlen, D. C., Silvia, P. J., Kane, M. J., & Beaty, R. E. (2025). The creative mind in daily life: How cognitive and affective experiences relate to creative thinking and behavior. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 19(1), 150–164. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000537

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Science Education, STEM Education

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Edanur Şahin
0009-0000-6958-8437
Türkiye

Funda Okuşluk ^*
0000-0002-1334-4043
Türkiye

Publication Date

April 30, 2026

Submission Date

June 12, 2025

Acceptance Date

March 28, 2026

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 27 Number: 1

DOI

https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.1718625

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA83NU36WE

APA

Şahin, E., & Okuşluk, F. (2026). Determining the Effect of Inquiry-Based STEM Activities on the Creative Personality Traits of Disadvantaged Female Students. İnönü University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 27(1), 24-43. https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.1718625

AMA

1.Şahin E, Okuşluk F. Determining the Effect of Inquiry-Based STEM Activities on the Creative Personality Traits of Disadvantaged Female Students. INUJFE. 2026;27(1):24-43. doi:10.17679/inuefd.1718625

Chicago

Şahin, Edanur, and Funda Okuşluk. 2026. “Determining the Effect of Inquiry-Based STEM Activities on the Creative Personality Traits of Disadvantaged Female Students”. İnönü University Journal of the Faculty of Education 27 (1): 24-43. https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.1718625.

EndNote

Şahin E, Okuşluk F (April 1, 2026) Determining the Effect of Inquiry-Based STEM Activities on the Creative Personality Traits of Disadvantaged Female Students. İnönü University Journal of the Faculty of Education 27 1 24–43.

IEEE

[1]E. Şahin and F. Okuşluk, “Determining the Effect of Inquiry-Based STEM Activities on the Creative Personality Traits of Disadvantaged Female Students”, INUJFE, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 24–43, Apr. 2026, doi: 10.17679/inuefd.1718625.

ISNAD

Şahin, Edanur - Okuşluk, Funda. “Determining the Effect of Inquiry-Based STEM Activities on the Creative Personality Traits of Disadvantaged Female Students”. İnönü University Journal of the Faculty of Education 27/1 (April 1, 2026): 24-43. https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.1718625.

JAMA

1.Şahin E, Okuşluk F. Determining the Effect of Inquiry-Based STEM Activities on the Creative Personality Traits of Disadvantaged Female Students. INUJFE. 2026;27:24–43.

MLA

Şahin, Edanur, and Funda Okuşluk. “Determining the Effect of Inquiry-Based STEM Activities on the Creative Personality Traits of Disadvantaged Female Students”. İnönü University Journal of the Faculty of Education, vol. 27, no. 1, Apr. 2026, pp. 24-43, doi:10.17679/inuefd.1718625.

Vancouver

1.Edanur Şahin, Funda Okuşluk. Determining the Effect of Inquiry-Based STEM Activities on the Creative Personality Traits of Disadvantaged Female Students. INUJFE. 2026 Apr. 1;27(1):24-43. doi:10.17679/inuefd.1718625

Sorgulama Temelli STEM Etkinliklerinin Dezavantajlı Kız Öğrencilerin Yaratıcı Kişilik Özelliklerine Etkisinin Belirlenmesi

Abstract

Keywords

Project Number

Determining the Effect of Inquiry-Based STEM Activities on the Creative Personality Traits of Disadvantaged Female Students

Abstract

Keywords

Supporting Institution

Project Number

Ethical Statement

Thanks

References

Details

Primary Language

Subjects

Journal Section

Authors

Publication Date

Submission Date

Acceptance Date

Published in Issue

DOI

IZ

Cite