THINKING SKILLS AND LEARNING STRATEGIES: USING THE MYSTERY APPROACH WITHIN PRIMARY EDUCATION

Year 2025, Volume: 14 Issue: 2, 1 - 14, 30.06.2025

Margaretha Häggström

https://doi.org/10.55020/iojpe.1668464

Abstract

Early critical thinking and sustainability awareness development is crucial for equipping future generations to handle global issues in an increasingly complicated and interconnected society. This study examined how 9-year-old primary school students applied their knowledge through a collaborative Mystery assignment, demonstrating a Thinking Skill Learning Strategy within education for sustainable development. The Mystery Learning Strategy supported holistic and pluralistic educational approaches, fostering critical thinking, social interaction, and individual development within a socio-cultural framework. Inspired by lesson study principles and based on participatory observations, the findings revealed that while the Mystery approach is dynamic and engaging, it requires careful facilitation to be effective. The study demonstrated that collaboration and critical reasoning were fostered among students. By working in groups, sharing ideas, and building on one another’s suggestions, students engaged in communication, active listening, and the integration of diverse perspectives. Future research could investigate the long-term effects of the mystery approach on developing critical thinking skills and enhancing sustainability awareness in younger students.

Keywords

Critical thinking , envisionment , learning strategies , play-based learning , primary education.

Ethical Statement

Certain ethical considerations were addressed to ensure a safe environment, both physically and emotionally, and to acknowledge the power imbalance between students and researchers. Demonstrating genuine interest in the students’ play helped build trust. Balancing participation and observation were critical; excessive involvement could influence their behaviour, while insufficient involvement could hinder the collection of meaningful insights. Additional considerations were taken in accordance with the Mystery Method, role play, and play-based learning as younger children often require more guidance and support during these activities. As a researcher, I had to balance observation with providing appropriate scaffolding. The study adheres to the core ethical principles outlined by Ethical Research Involving Children (ERIC, 2013): respect, benefit, and justice. ERIC emphasizes the need for critical reflection, context-specific problem-solving, and transparency. The study also complies with the ethical requirements for research in Sweden (Swedish Research Council, 2017) and the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Throughout the research process, the rights and interests of the students were prioritized, ensuring their best interests and potential benefits were consistently considered. Data was anonymized to protect privacy. No conflicts of interest are related to this work.

References

• Aiono, S. M. (2015). Hitting the ground running: Meeting the national standards at age 5. New Zealand Education Review, 6(3), 1-12.
• Aiono, S. M. (2020). An ınvestigation of two models of professional development to support effective teaching through play practices in the primary classroom (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Massey University, Manawatū, New Zealand.
• Baumfield, V., Bethel, A., Boyle, C., Katene, W., Knowler, H., & Koutsouris, G. (2022). How lesson study is used in initial teacher education: an international review of literature. Teacher Development, 26(3), 356.372. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2022.2063937
• Bergen, D. (2009). Play as the learning medium for future scientists, mathematicians and engineers. American Journal of Play, 1, 413-428.
• Biesta, G. (2020). Risking ourselves in education: qualification, socialization, and subjectification revisited. Educational Theory. 89-104. https://doi-org.ezproxy.ub.gu.se/10.1111/edth.12411
• Bingham, A. J. (2023). From data management to actionable findings: A five-phase process of qualitative data analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22, https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231183620
• Blucher, M. E. (2017). Stakeholder perspectives of play-based learning in the first year of primary school: A case study in Aotearoa (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). New Zealand. Massey University.
• Briggs, M. (2012). Play-based learning in the primary school. Sage.
• Cáceres, M., Nussbaum, M., & Ortiz, J. (2020). Integrating critical thinking into the classroom: A teacher’s perspective. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100674
• Council of Europe. (2023). Guide for Fostering a Democratic School Culture.
• Drisko, J. W., & T. Maschi. (2015). Content analysis. Oxford University Press.
• Ehlers, N., Havekes, H., & Nolet, R. (eds.), (2008). Living and Learning in Border Regions. Cross border Learning Activities. Issues - Methods - Places. Volkshochschule, Aachen.
• Ennis, R. H. (2018). Critical thinking across the curriculum: A vision. Topoi, 37(1), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-016-9401-4
• ERIC. (2013). Ethical research involving children. UNICEF Office of Research. https://childethics.com/
• Facione, P. A. (2009). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. California Academic Press.
• Häggström, M. (2020). Estetiska erfarenheter i naturmöten. En fenomenologisk studie av upplevelser av skog, växtlighet och Undervisning [Aesthetical experiences in direct nature meetings. A Phenomenological study on experiences of forest, plants and education] (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
• Häggström, M., & Schmidt, C. (2020). Enhancing children’s literacy and ecological literacy through critical place-based pedagogy. Environmental Education Research, 26(12), 1729-1745. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2020.1812537
• Jickling, B., Blenkinsop, S., Timmerman, N., & De Danann Sitka-Sage, M. (Eds.), (2018). Wild Pedagogies Touchstones for Re-Negotiating Education and the Environment in the Anthropocene. Palgrave MacMillan.
• Karkdijk, J., van der Schee, J., & Admiraal, W. (2021). Strategies used by small student groups to understand a geographical mystery. Journal of research and didactics in geography, 1(10), 5-21. https://doi.org/10.4458/3945-01
• Langer, J. (2011). Envisioning literature. Literary understanding and literature ınstruction. Teachers College Press.
• Leat, D. (2001). More teaching thinking through geography. Chris Kington Publishing.
• Leat, D., & Nichols, A. (1999). Theory into practice. Mystery Makes You Think. The Geographical Association.
• Lund, E. (2021). Historiedidaktikk [History didactics]. Universitetsforlaget
• Macchi, S., & Ridle, C. (2012). Who done it? Connecting murder mysteries to the communication classroom. Communication Teacher, 26(2), 104-108. https://doi.org/10.1080/17404622.2011.644307
• McNaughton, M. J. (2014). From acting to action. Developing global citizenship through global storylines drama. The Journal of Environmental Education, 45(1), 16-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2013.804397
• Maude. A. (2018) Geography and powerful knowledge: a contribution to the debate. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 27(2), 179-190. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2017.1320899
• National Agency for Education. (2022). Curriculum for compulsory school, preschool class and school-age educare – Lgr22. Skolverket.
• O’Reilly, C., Devitt, A., & Hayes, N. (2022). Critical thinking in the preschool classroom - A systematic literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 46, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101110
• Pedersen Dalland, C., Bjørnestad, E., & Andersson-Bakken, E. (2021). Observasjon som metode i barnehage- og klasseromsforskning [Observation as method in preschool and primary school research]. In E. I. Andersen Bakken & C. Pedersen Dalland (eds), Metoder i klasseromsforskning. Forskningsdesign, datainnsamling og analyse. [Methods in Classroom Research: Research Design, Data Collection, and Analysis]. (125- 152). Universitetsforlaget.
• Simonovic, B., Vione, K., Stupple, E., & Doherty, A. (2023). It is not what you think it is how you think: A critical thinking intervention enhances argumentation, analytic thinking and metacognitive sensitivity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 49, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101362
• Susanti, R. (2024). Effective strategies in developing critical thinking skills in elementary school age children. West Science Interdisciplinary Studies, 02(04), 732-736.
• Swedish Research Council. (201). Good research practice. Vetenskapsrådet.
• Tryggvason, Á., Öhman, J., & Van Poeck, K. (2023). Pluralistic environmental and sustainabilityeducation – a scholarly review. Environmental Education Research, 29(10), 1460-1485. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2023.2229076
• Thornberg, R., & Elvstrand, H. (2012). Children's experiences of democracy, participation, and trust in school. International Journal of Educational Research, (53), 44-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2011.12.010
• UNESCO. (2020). Education for sustainable development. A roadmap. ESD for 2030. UNESCO.
• Yuan, R., Liao, W., Wang, Z., Kong, J., & Zhang, Y. (2022). How do English-as-a-foreign-language (EFL) teachers perceive and engage with critical thinking: A systematic review from 2010 to 2020. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 43, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101002
• Vincent-Lancrin, S. (2023). Fostering and assessing student critical thinking: From theory to teaching practice. European Journal of Education, 58, 354–368. https://doi-org.ezproxy.ub.gu.se/10.1111/ejed.12569
• Vincent-Lancrin, S., González-Sancho, C., Bouckaert, M., de Luca, F., Fernández-Barrerra, M., Jacotin, G., Urgel, J., & Vidal, Q. (2019). Fostering Students' creativity and critical thinking in education: What it means in school. OECD Publishing.
• Vygotskij, L. S. (1995). Fantasi och kreativitet i barndomen [Imagination and Creativity in Childhood]. Daidalos.
• Willingham, D.T. (2020). How can educators teach critical thinking? American Educator, 1, 41-51.