EXPLORING VIETNAMESE PRIMARY SCHOOL TEACHERS’ KNOWLEDGE, EXPERIENCES, AND PERSPECTIVES IN CLIL IMPLEMENTATION
Abstract
In Vietnam, content and language integrated learning (CLIL) has been introduced as an innovative approach to simultaneously develop elementary students’ language skills and academic subject knowledge. This study aims to investigate elementary teachers’ knowledge, experiences, and perspectives on CLIL implementation in Vietnam. Employing a mixed-methods design, this study administered a questionnaire comprising 20 five-point Likert-scale items to 100 teachers in the pilot phase and 183 teachers in the main phase, and conducted individual interviews with six teachers using nine open-ended questions. The findings reveal that although teachers possessed basic insights, relevant experience, and positive perspectives on CLIL (with mean scores exceeding 3.6), they faced several challenges related to professional development, collaboration and administrative support, and disparities in students’ language proficiency. In addition, teachers’ knowledge and experience were positively associated with their perspectives on CLIL (r = .68, p < .001; r = .52, p < .001, respectively), with knowledge emerging as a significant predictor (β = .62, p < .001), and a positive trend was observed between teachers’ language proficiency and their attitudes toward CLIL. Based on the participants’ responses, this study proposes several suggestions concerning training programmes, cooperation, and administrative support to enhance the effectiveness of CLIL implementation in Vietnamese elementary schools.
Keywords
Bilingual education, CLIL implementation, primary school, teacher, Vietnam.
Ethical Statement
References
- Banegas, D. L., Montgomery, P., & Raud, N. (2024). Student-teachers’ understanding of language teaching through the CLIL Language Triptych. Learning and Instruction, 95, 1-9. Article 102044. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.102044
- Barrios, E., & Milla Lara, M. (2020). CLIL methodology, materials and resources, and assessment in a monolingual context: An analysis of stakeholders’ perceptions in Andalusia. The Language Learning Journal, 48(1), 60–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2018
- Belobrovy, A., & Nygård Larsson, P. (2020). Meaning-making in science from the perspective of students’ hybrid language use. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(7), 1363–1384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-09994-z
- Campillo-Ferrer, J., Miralles-Martínez, P., & Sánchez-Ibáñez, R. (2020). CLIL teachers’ views on cognitive development in primary education. Palgrave Communications, 6, Article 97. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-0480-x
- Campillo, J. M., Sánchez, R., & Miralles, P. (2019). Primary Teachers’ Perceptions of CLIL Implementation in Spain. English Language Teaching, 12(4), 149-156. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n4p149
- Cenoz, J., Genesee, F., & Gorter, D. (2014). Critical analysis of CLIL: Taking stock and looking forward. Applied Linguistics, 35(3), 243–262. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt01
- Chen, H. (2023). Teaching CLIL to primary school students under Taiwan’s bilingual 2030 plan. TESOL Communications, 3(1), 66–86. https://doi.org/10.58304/tc.20240105
- Coyle, D. (2007). Content and language integrated learning: Towards a connected research agenda for CLIL pedagogies. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10(5), 543–562. https://doi.org/10.2167/beb459.0
- Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL: Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge University Press. https://assets.cambridge.org/97805211/30219/excerpt/9780521130219_excerpt.pdf
- Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE.


